check issue ACL & Packet rate is too high and vrrp flap

  • 0
  • 2
  • Problem
  • Updated 1 year ago
  • Not a Problem
I need support to check issue ACL & Packet rate is too high and vrrp flap on Extreme X650-24x.
Below is captured log from the switch :
08/29/2014 22:29:16.06 <Info:LACP.AddPortToAggr> Add port 6 to aggregator
08/29/2014 22:29:16.06 <Info:LACP.AddPortToAggr> Add port 5 to aggregator
08/29/2014 22:29:16.05 <Noti:VRRP.StateChng> VLAN internet-ext vrid 26: transitioning to MASTER(2)
08/29/2014 22:29:16.05 <Noti:VRRP.StateChng> VLAN user-ext vrid 26: transitioning to MASTER(2)
08/29/2014 22:29:12.07 <Noti:VRRP.StateChng> VLAN internet-ext vrid 26: transitioning to INIT(0)
08/29/2014 22:29:12.07 <Noti:VRRP.StateChng> VLAN user-ext vrid 26: transitioning to INIT(0)
08/29/2014 22:29:12.00 <Info:LACP.RemPortFromAggr> Remove port 6 from aggregator
08/29/2014 22:29:11.95 <Info:LACP.RemPortFromAggr> Remove port 5 from aggregator
08/29/2014 22:29:11.85 <Info:LACP.AddPortToAggr> Add port 1 to aggregator
08/29/2014 22:29:11.84 <Info:LACP.RemPortFromAggr> Remove port 1 from aggregator
08/29/2014 22:29:06.55 <Warn:VRRP.Advert.Ign> Advert for VR on vlan internet-ext vrid 26 ignored: ignoring lower priority advert
08/29/2014 22:29:06.55 <Warn:VRRP.Advert.Ign> Advert for VR on vlan internet-ext vrid 26 ignored: ignoring lower priority advert
08/29/2014 22:29:06.54 <Warn:VRRP.Advert.Ign> Advert for VR on vlan user-ext vrid 26 ignored: ignoring lower priority advert
08/29/2014 22:29:06.54 <Warn:VRRP.Advert.Ign> Advert for VR on vlan user-ext vrid 26 ignored: ignoring lower priority advert
08/29/2014 22:29:05.96 <Info:LACP.AddPortToAggr> Add port 6 to aggregator
08/29/2014 22:29:05.79 <Info:LACP.AddPortToAggr> Add port 5 to aggregator
08/29/2014 22:29:05.78 <Noti:VRRP.StateChng> VLAN internet-ext vrid 26: transitioning to MASTER(2)
08/29/2014 22:29:05.78 <Noti:VRRP.StateChng> VLAN user-ext vrid 26: transitioning to MASTER(2)
08/29/2014 22:29:03.90 <Crit:Kern.Emergency> CL's & packet rate is too high.
08/29/2014 22:29:03.90 <Crit:Kern.Emergency> Previous message repeated 19 additional times in the last 1 second(s)
08/29/2014 22:29:03.90 <Crit:Kern.Emergency> CL's & packetCCCL's & packet rate is too high.CL's & packet rate is too high.
08/29/2014 22:29:03.90 <Crit:Kern.Emergency> CL's & packet rate is too high.
08/29/2014 22:29:03.89 <Crit:Kern.Emergency> Previous message repeated 16 additional times in the last 1 second(s)

Anyone has experience before with this problem?

BR,

AD
Photo of adhe tri martika

adhe tri martika

  • 100 Points 100 badge 2x thumb

Posted 4 years ago

  • 0
  • 2
Photo of Sumit Tokle

Sumit Tokle, Alum

  • 5,738 Points 5k badge 2x thumb
How many ACL's have you applied on port 1,5,6?

I believe you could test this setup after disabling  ACL on these port(aggregation). There could be chances that control traffic is getting dropped.

If you could open case with TAC, they could provide you RCA with PD # on s/w which you are running on device.
Photo of M.Nees

M.Nees, Embassador

  • 9,126 Points 5k badge 2x thumb
same issue to me ! 

no ACL configured - only software redundant port ...

X450-G2 EXOS 16.1.3.6-Patch-1-11

Case: 01289992