Switch is ignoring enable group sharing and it's causing a loopback

  • 0
  • 1
  • Problem
  • Updated 4 years ago
  • In Progress
Hi everyone

I have an issue with one of my stacks where it's acting like a loopback issue. For example, in this case I have ports 1:41 and 14:2 on switch 1 grouped and Uplinked to ports 1:53, 6:53 which are also grouped on switch 2. Now this configuration has been the same since we first deployed these switches and only recently I've been losing connectivity on switch 2. The only way to temporary resolve the issue is to disable port 1:42 on Switch 1. In addition, I also have elrp excluded on both ends of the uplinks. If anyone has any suggestions please let me know.

Thanks
Photo of Arison Mercado

Arison Mercado

  • 442 Points 250 badge 2x thumb

Posted 4 years ago

  • 0
  • 1
Photo of PARTHIBAN CHINNAYA

PARTHIBAN CHINNAYA, Alum

  • 4,382 Points 4k badge 2x thumb
Definitely something has been changed in sharing config or there is physical loop in switch 1...
Could you check sharing config on both switches....
Show l2stats
Clear l2stats
Show l2stats
Photo of Arison Mercado

Arison Mercado

  • 442 Points 250 badge 2x thumb
Thank you for your response and I reviewed what  you have recommended and I didn't see anything out of the ordinary with associated VLANs on that grouping config.
Photo of Sumit Tokle

Sumit Tokle, Alum

  • 5,738 Points 5k badge 2x thumb
What type of switches are these?
Is it X460 with XGM module or X670 switch?
What is the s/w running on it?
Photo of Arison Mercado

Arison Mercado

  • 442 Points 250 badge 2x thumb
The first switch model is X670V-48x (Stack) with version 15.3.1.4 v1531b4-patch1-33

second X460-48t (Stack) with version 15.3.1.4 v1531b4-patch1-33
Photo of Sumit Tokle

Sumit Tokle, Alum

  • 5,738 Points 5k badge 2x thumb
I think it's know issues.

Please call TAC and asked software which has resolved all the issues related with X670 and X460(XGM module).
Photo of Arison Mercado

Arison Mercado

  • 442 Points 250 badge 2x thumb
We bought our switches and service contract with a 3rd party company so I do not have the contact to TAC. Is there a way I can find it?
Photo of Tony Steed

Tony Steed

  • 70 Points

It doesn't sound like a known issue... It's more likely a configuration issue. I would confirm the following:

- show port sharing (verify the LAG configuration is consistent on both sides of the link)

- show elrp (verify that no loop condition exists on any of the VLANs); sift through show config and verify that interconnect LAG ports are in fact excluded from ELRP)

- Show log match <master port number>: attempt to discern when the interfaces go off-line and what corresponding changes may be causing the event(s); don't rule out a phy problem (i.e. physical layer issue with optics - if applicable, patch cables, etc.)

We use ELRP in conjunction with LAG ports in many scenarios with both current and superannuated firmware versions and have never encountered any issues

Photo of Arison Mercado

Arison Mercado

  • 442 Points 250 badge 2x thumb
Hi Tony,

Thank you for your input, I will definitely use that for troubleshooting if this occurs again. Also, I was able to contact TAC support and what we identified is that when the grouping ports were active on both ends, one of them would stay on a ready state causing the switch to lose some network connectivity. So the engineer, conducted a remote session and reviewed the "debug" results and came to the conclusion that one of the switches on the stack is in fact defective.
Photo of Tony Steed

Tony Steed

  • 70 Points

I appreciate you keeping me in the loop... This lends itself to my earlier reference to a potentially defective phy. I'm glad it worked out for you.

Tony

Photo of Sumit Tokle

Sumit Tokle, Alum

  • 5,738 Points 5k badge 2x thumb
which switch? is it X460 with XGM module.