What would be the proper way to replace an old RFS controller with a VX9000? Of-course if there are no access ports involved (e.g. ap622), just access points.
Thank you in advance.
So, for clarification, the AP622 runs wing 5 natively, only ap300 AP200 and ap100 are considered ports and designed to run in a slip mac architecture, these all use wisp and wispe (in the case of the ap300)
The VX9000 has a limited data backplane so we typically don’t recommend to tunnel traffic. The code will allow you to do this, and we will support restricted tunneling (100 tunnels max).
We would recommend that you configure the access points to adopt using Layer 3. I would also recommend using mint level 2.
This will require you to have a minimum of two rf-domain (one for the VX and one for the Aps)
Finally, I would recommend disabling layer 2 adoption on the controller
This is achieved by the line no mlcp vlan under the VX device profile.
It is also worth removing any latency mint links by service mint clear mlcphope this helps
I'm fairly new with Extreme Wireless.
We have a similar case where a customer wants to replace RFS6000 with VX9000.
They are running 2 SSIDs (Local Mode on VLAN 1) and 2 SSIDs (Tunnel Mode on VLAN 10).
The tunnel mode SSIDs are for guest and mobile users which have access to internet only.
To provide internet only to VLAN10, they have created 1 port on RFS6000 as access port on VLAN10 and connected that port to internet router directly.
My questions are:
1. What's the best way to migrate from RFS6000 to VX9000.
2. Since VX9000 wouldn't have physical interfaces, how could we separate the guest traffic to have only internet access?