Header Only - DO NOT REMOVE - Extreme Networks

Add VLAN to trunk causes switch to drop


Userlevel 2
Hi all, I've got two switches separated by about 7 miles of fiber and an Internet link at each site. I need a certain number of VLANs to extend between the sites for HA purposes. VLANs: tagged 243, 923-925, 927, 1000, untagged 4040 All of these VLANs span the trunk no problem except for 927. When I apply 927 the distant switch drops. When I remove 927, it comes back. Spantree is applied and enabled at the HA site, but not the main site. Where do I need to look to solve this problem?

21 replies

Userlevel 6
Hello Terren,

Would you elaborate on the switch drops? Do you lose communication through ALL the VLANs once 927 is added?
I think you could start with the remote switch vlan configuration. Sounds like the trunk port on the remote switch is not configured to be part of vlan 927 and has ingress filtering enabled.
Userlevel 2
Patrick Voss wrote:

Hello Terren,

Would you elaborate on the switch drops? Do you lose communication through ALL the VLANs once 927 is added?

Yeah. The switch basically drops from the network.
Userlevel 4
What is in the logs of both switches?
Userlevel 2
Nick Yakimenko wrote:

What is in the logs of both switches?

<165>Mar 13 22:29:04 10.40.40.253 LinkTrap[11]Interface vlan.0.1000 is Down. <165>Mar 13 22:29:04 10.40.40.253 Spantree[11]Receive Event: Multiple BPDU sources received on Port = tg.11.1, BPDU Bridge MAC = 20:b3:99:57:d4:e8 Port = 338 Prior Bridge MAC = cc:f9:54:27:0e:3d Port = 2309 <165>Mar 13 22:29:04 10.40.40.253 LinkTrap[11]Interface vlan.0.4040 is Down. <165>Mar 13 22:29:04 10.40.40.253 Spantree[11]Receive Event: Multiple BPDU sources received on Port = tg.11.2, BPDU Bridge MAC = cc:f9:54:27:0e:3d Port = 2309 Prior Bridge MAC = 20:b3:99:57:d4:e8 Port = 337 <165>Mar 13 22:29:04 10.40.40.253 System[11]Reconnect attempted for logging server 1 (10.0.200.216) <165>Mar 13 22:56:16 10.40.40.253 LinkTrap[11]Interface tg.11.2 is Down. <165>Mar 13 22:56:16 10.40.40.253 Spantree[11]Multiple BPDU sources received condition has been cleared for Port = tg.11.2 <165>Mar 13 22:56:16 10.40.40.253 System[11]Reconnect attempted for logging server 1 (10.0.200.216) <165>Mar 13 22:56:35 10.40.40.253 LinkTrap[11]Interface tg.11.1 is Down. <165>Mar 13 22:56:35 10.40.40.253 Spantree[11]Multiple BPDU sources received condition has been cleared for Port = tg.11.1 <165>Mar 13 22:56:40 10.40.40.253 LinkTrap[11]Interface tg.11.1 is Up. <165>Mar 13 22:59:03 10.40.40.253 LinkTrap[11]Interface tg.11.1 is Down. <165>Mar 13 22:59:05 10.40.40.253 LinkTrap[11]Interface tg.11.2 is Up. <165>Mar 13 23:01:09 10.40.40.253 System[11]PoE Mode button has been activated. <165>Mar 13 23:01:44 10.40.40.253 LinkTrap[11]Interface tg.11.1 is Up.
Userlevel 2
Nick Yakimenko wrote:

What is in the logs of both switches?

This is a snippet of the logs from the HA site switch. The primary site switch does not show any related logs.
Do you have spangaurd on or adminedge turned on? Also, what hardware and code are you running at each site? Also, what version. Take a look at this, depending on what you are running.

https://community.extremenetworks.com/extreme/topics/connecting-s-series-with-x450-g2-rstp-error-mul...
Userlevel 2
Jeremy Gibbs wrote:

Do you have spangaurd on or adminedge turned on? Also, what hardware and code are you running at each site? Also, what version. Take a look at this, depending on what you are running.

https://community.extremenetworks.com/extreme/topics/connecting-s-series-with-x450-g2-rstp-error-mul...

Adminedge and spanguard are both off. Primary site is an S4 running 08.32.02.0009. HA site is a K10 with 08.41.01.0004.
Jeremy Gibbs wrote:

Do you have spangaurd on or adminedge turned on? Also, what hardware and code are you running at each site? Also, what version. Take a look at this, depending on what you are running.

https://community.extremenetworks.com/extreme/topics/connecting-s-series-with-x450-g2-rstp-error-mul...

When you run the command show spantree debug port *.*.* active

send a screen shot.. look for a high number of tx bpdu's

Also, read this:

http://documentation.extremenetworks.com/EOS_Config/S-K-Series/S-K-7100_Configuration_Guide/c_multis...
Jeremy Gibbs wrote:

Do you have spangaurd on or adminedge turned on? Also, what hardware and code are you running at each site? Also, what version. Take a look at this, depending on what you are running.

https://community.extremenetworks.com/extreme/topics/connecting-s-series-with-x450-g2-rstp-error-mul...

Also, another good command is, show spantree stats active

See if there is anything being blocked already etc...
Userlevel 2
Jeremy Gibbs wrote:

Do you have spangaurd on or adminedge turned on? Also, what hardware and code are you running at each site? Also, what version. Take a look at this, depending on what you are running.

https://community.extremenetworks.com/extreme/topics/connecting-s-series-with-x450-g2-rstp-error-mul...

STP Diagnostic Port Counters for SID 0 Port tg.11.1 ------------------------------------------------------------ Message Expiration Count - 0 Invalid BPDU Count - 0 Disputed BPDU Count - 2209 STP BPDU Rx Count - 0 STP BPDU Tx Count - 0 STP TCN BPDU Rx Count - 0 STP TCN BPDU Tx Count - 0 STP TC BPDU Rx Count - 0 STP TC BPDU Tx Count - 0 RST BPDU Rx Count - 2209 RST BPDU Tx Count - 0 RST TC BPDU Rx Count - 0 RST TC BPDU Tx Count - 0 MST BPDU Rx Count - 3544 MST BPDU Tx Count - 2295794 MST CIST TC BPDU Rx Count - 0 MST CIST TC BPDU Tx Count - 11 SPT BPDU Rx Count - 0 SPT BPDU Tx Count - 0 SPT TC BPDU Rx Count - 0 SPT TC BPDU Tx Count - 0
Userlevel 2
Jeremy Gibbs wrote:

Do you have spangaurd on or adminedge turned on? Also, what hardware and code are you running at each site? Also, what version. Take a look at this, depending on what you are running.

https://community.extremenetworks.com/extreme/topics/connecting-s-series-with-x450-g2-rstp-error-mul...

SID Port State Role Cost Priority --- ---------- ---------------- ----------- -------- -------- 0 tg.11.1 Forwarding Designated 20000 128 0 tg.11.2 Blocking Backup 20000 128
Userlevel 2
Jeremy Gibbs wrote:

Do you have spangaurd on or adminedge turned on? Also, what hardware and code are you running at each site? Also, what version. Take a look at this, depending on what you are running.

https://community.extremenetworks.com/extreme/topics/connecting-s-series-with-x450-g2-rstp-error-mul...

We may be barking up the wrong spantree here. It doesn't make much sense to me why 927 has problems, but the other six VLANs are fine.
Userlevel 2
I administratively set the second interface on the HA site switch to disable. Then I applied 927 to the trunk to the main interface with the same result. I feel like this isn't necessarily a spantree problem (it still could be). Here's the log buffer for the event: <165>Apr 4 15:36:11 10.40.40.253 LinkTrap[11]Interface tg.11.2 is Down. (This is when I admin down'd the port) <165>Apr 4 15:36:40 10.40.40.253 Spantree[11]Receive Event: Multiple BPDU sources received on Port = tg.11.1, BPDU Bridge MAC = cc:f9:54:27:0e:3d Port = 2309 Prior Bridge MAC = 20:b3:99:57:d4:e8 Port = 338 <165>Apr 4 15:36:40 10.40.40.253 LinkTrap[11]Interface vlan.0.1000 is Down. <165>Apr 4 15:36:40 10.40.40.253 LinkTrap[11]Interface vlan.0.4040 is Down. <165>Apr 4 15:36:40 10.40.40.253 OSPF[11]Router global: OSPF: NBR 10.40.40.251 transitioned from FULL to DOWN <165>Apr 4 15:36:40 10.40.40.253 OSPF[11]Router global: OSPF: NBR 10.40.40.252 transitioned from FULL to DOWN <164>Apr 4 15:36:40 10.40.40.253 OSPF[11]Router global: OSPF: invalid route discarded - dest 127.0.0.0 <164>Apr 4 15:36:41 10.40.40.253 Emanate[11.SNMPagent]Sr_send_inform: invalid transport <165>Apr 4 15:36:53 10.40.40.253 LinkTrap[11]Interface vlan.0.1000 is Up. <165>Apr 4 15:36:53 10.40.40.253 LinkTrap[11]Interface vlan.0.4040 is Up. <164>Apr 4 15:36:54 10.40.40.253 OSPF[11]Router global: OSPF: Packet dropped - vlan.0.4040 cfg error - src ip 10.40.40.251 - BAD PACKET <165>Apr 4 15:36:55 10.40.40.253 OSPF[11]Router global: OSPF: NBR 10.40.40.252 transitioned from LOADING to FULL <165>Apr 4 15:37:03 10.40.40.253 OSPF[11]Router global: OSPF: NBR 10.40.40.251 transitioned from LOADING to FULL <164>Apr 4 15:37:08 10.40.40.253 OSPF[11]Router global: OSPF: invalid route discarded - dest 127.0.0.0 <165>Apr 4 15:37:09 10.40.40.253 Spantree[11]Multiple BPDU sources received condition has been cleared for Port = tg.11.1
Does this number keep going up:

Disputed BPDU Count - 2209
Userlevel 2
Jeremy Gibbs wrote:

Does this number keep going up:

Disputed BPDU Count - 2209

2296 this morning.
Userlevel 2
Update: one of the MACs that was in the Multiple BPDU message belongs to an Avaya device. Compass shows me that MAC on the uplink port between the main site switch and another switch with the Address Type MAC and Filter ID 927. Also, this MAC is on tg.11.3 of the HA site switch with the Address Type BPDU, Filter ID 927, and VLAN ID 927.
How do you have STP configured on that Avaya device? Is it running STP or is it broadcasting out BPDUs of its own with itself labeled as the root bridge?

I am suspecting it is some weird STP config on a device.
Userlevel 2
Jeremy Gibbs wrote:

How do you have STP configured on that Avaya device? Is it running STP or is it broadcasting out BPDUs of its own with itself labeled as the root bridge?

I am suspecting it is some weird STP config on a device.

I've opened a GTAC case. The Avaya MAC is only showing up on one uplink interface and a disabled port with nothing connected.
Jeremy Gibbs wrote:

How do you have STP configured on that Avaya device? Is it running STP or is it broadcasting out BPDUs of its own with itself labeled as the root bridge?

I am suspecting it is some weird STP config on a device.

Weird.. do share the results!
Userlevel 7
Hi Terren, Do you have anything from GTAC that you can share with the group?
Userlevel 2
Drew C. wrote:

Hi Terren, Do you have anything from GTAC that you can share with the group?

Negative. The resolution I'm pursuing is to institute a new VLAN to carry 927s current load. It seems to work. The true scope of the issue would likely involve a re-engineering of sorts.

Reply