Header Only - DO NOT REMOVE - Extreme Networks

adj 0.0.0.0: # L3 hash table entries already 0


adj 0.0.0.0: # L3 hash table entries already 0.

the above log keeps on repeating several times, what could be the issue.....

5 replies

Userlevel 6
Hi Saiprasad,

This is a cosmetic warning that should not cause any network related issues. Here is an article that might explain it a little better:

https://gtacknowledge.extremenetworks.com/articles/Solution/Backup-node-of-a-SummitStack-logs-warning-adj-0-0-0-0-L3-hash-table-entries-already-0

I don't know what kind of hardware and whether or not this is a stack or a chassis but this should explain it better. I would recommend upgrading to the recommended version of code according to the article below:

https://gtacknowledge.extremenetworks.com/articles/Q_A/What-Is-The-Recommended-Release-of-EXOS-For-My-Platform

Let me know if you have any questions.
Patrick Voss wrote:

Hi Saiprasad,

This is a cosmetic warning that should not cause any network related issues. Here is an article that might explain it a little better:

https://gtacknowledge.extremenetworks.com/articles/Solution/Backup-node-of-a-SummitStack-logs-warning-adj-0-0-0-0-L3-hash-table-entries-already-0

I don't know what kind of hardware and whether or not this is a stack or a chassis but this should explain it better. I would recommend upgrading to the recommended version of code according to the article below:

https://gtacknowledge.extremenetworks.com/articles/Q_A/What-Is-The-Recommended-Release-of-EXOS-For-My-Platform

Let me know if you have any questions.

We are running on 15.4.1.3 all all X440 switches, is it fine or do they still require an upgrade.....
Userlevel 6
Patrick Voss wrote:

Hi Saiprasad,

This is a cosmetic warning that should not cause any network related issues. Here is an article that might explain it a little better:

https://gtacknowledge.extremenetworks.com/articles/Solution/Backup-node-of-a-SummitStack-logs-warning-adj-0-0-0-0-L3-hash-table-entries-already-0

I don't know what kind of hardware and whether or not this is a stack or a chassis but this should explain it better. I would recommend upgrading to the recommended version of code according to the article below:

https://gtacknowledge.extremenetworks.com/articles/Q_A/What-Is-The-Recommended-Release-of-EXOS-For-My-Platform

Let me know if you have any questions.

The article specifies 15.4.2 or higher. The recommended software will probably be 15.5 something. I would recommend upgrading to remove the log message.
Userlevel 6
Patrick Voss wrote:

Hi Saiprasad,

This is a cosmetic warning that should not cause any network related issues. Here is an article that might explain it a little better:

https://gtacknowledge.extremenetworks.com/articles/Solution/Backup-node-of-a-SummitStack-logs-warning-adj-0-0-0-0-L3-hash-table-entries-already-0

I don't know what kind of hardware and whether or not this is a stack or a chassis but this should explain it better. I would recommend upgrading to the recommended version of code according to the article below:

https://gtacknowledge.extremenetworks.com/articles/Q_A/What-Is-The-Recommended-Release-of-EXOS-For-My-Platform

Let me know if you have any questions.

Please keep in mind that the message is cosmetic so you can leave it and there should not be any network related issues. The message can also be removed from the logs through configuration.
Patrick Voss wrote:

Hi Saiprasad,

This is a cosmetic warning that should not cause any network related issues. Here is an article that might explain it a little better:

https://gtacknowledge.extremenetworks.com/articles/Solution/Backup-node-of-a-SummitStack-logs-warning-adj-0-0-0-0-L3-hash-table-entries-already-0

I don't know what kind of hardware and whether or not this is a stack or a chassis but this should explain it better. I would recommend upgrading to the recommended version of code according to the article below:

https://gtacknowledge.extremenetworks.com/articles/Q_A/What-Is-The-Recommended-Release-of-EXOS-For-My-Platform

Let me know if you have any questions.

Hi,

I've got the same behavior at the x440, but we are running on 15.6.3.1 patch 1-5

Reply