<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic AP650  redundant links or aggregate in Aerohive Migrated Content</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/aerohive-migrated-content/ap650-redundant-links-or-aggregate/m-p/70294#M4666</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Both Ethernet interfaces on our AP650's are connected to multi-gig switchports.  Knowing that only ETH0 is capable of 2.5G, should I configure the interfaces as an aggregate or redundant?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How should I configure the switchports for each mode?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2019 04:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jason_simmons</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-08-07T04:17:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>AP650  redundant links or aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/aerohive-migrated-content/ap650-redundant-links-or-aggregate/m-p/70294#M4666</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Both Ethernet interfaces on our AP650's are connected to multi-gig switchports.  Knowing that only ETH0 is capable of 2.5G, should I configure the interfaces as an aggregate or redundant?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How should I configure the switchports for each mode?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2019 04:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/aerohive-migrated-content/ap650-redundant-links-or-aggregate/m-p/70294#M4666</guid>
      <dc:creator>jason_simmons</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-07T04:17:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AP650  redundant links or aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/aerohive-migrated-content/ap650-redundant-links-or-aggregate/m-p/70295#M4667</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There are very few use cases were aggregating the ports on an AP will come in handy, generally this won't be needed. I'd recommend going with redundant instead. The switch ports will need to be set as trunk ports if you're using more than one VLAN, or access ports if we're only using one VLAN. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2019 19:51:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/aerohive-migrated-content/ap650-redundant-links-or-aggregate/m-p/70295#M4667</guid>
      <dc:creator>samantha_lynn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-07T19:51:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AP650  redundant links or aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/aerohive-migrated-content/ap650-redundant-links-or-aggregate/m-p/70296#M4668</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The&amp;nbsp;problem I'm facing is that some of the APs aren't coming up&amp;nbsp;until I unplug one of the links to the AP.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;​Currently, the switch ports are configured as a trunk and all VLANs are being tagged.&amp;nbsp;The ports on the AP were configured as uplinks before I reconfigured&amp;nbsp;them as redundant links.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I rebooted the switch after configuring the AP ports as redundant links and the issue remains only 4 of the 12&amp;nbsp;APs connected to this switch came up after the reboot.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2019 22:50:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/aerohive-migrated-content/ap650-redundant-links-or-aggregate/m-p/70296#M4668</guid>
      <dc:creator>jason_simmons</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-07T22:50:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AP650  redundant links or aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/aerohive-migrated-content/ap650-redundant-links-or-aggregate/m-p/70297#M4669</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I just rebooted after disabling one link to each AP and now none of them are online.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2019 23:24:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/aerohive-migrated-content/ap650-redundant-links-or-aggregate/m-p/70297#M4669</guid>
      <dc:creator>jason_simmons</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-07T23:24:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AP650  redundant links or aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/aerohive-migrated-content/ap650-redundant-links-or-aggregate/m-p/70298#M4670</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Could you confirm the power budget on the switch you are using? Also what switch model are we using?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2019 01:28:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/aerohive-migrated-content/ap650-redundant-links-or-aggregate/m-p/70298#M4670</guid>
      <dc:creator>samantha_lynn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-08T01:28:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AP650  redundant links or aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/aerohive-migrated-content/ap650-redundant-links-or-aggregate/m-p/70299#M4671</link>
      <description>It’s a VC stack of Juniper EX4300-MPs.  PoE budget is 1100W.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2019 03:54:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/aerohive-migrated-content/ap650-redundant-links-or-aggregate/m-p/70299#M4671</guid>
      <dc:creator>jason_simmons</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-08T03:54:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AP650  redundant links or aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/aerohive-migrated-content/ap650-redundant-links-or-aggregate/m-p/70300#M4672</link>
      <description>Running JunOS version 18.4R1-S2.4.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2019 03:59:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/aerohive-migrated-content/ap650-redundant-links-or-aggregate/m-p/70300#M4672</guid>
      <dc:creator>jason_simmons</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-08T03:59:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AP650  redundant links or aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/aerohive-migrated-content/ap650-redundant-links-or-aggregate/m-p/70301#M4673</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for that information. Are these APs the only devices connected to that switch? Also could you send me tech data from one of the APs? There are a few things I'd like to check in that data. This guide reviews how to get tech data from the CLI of the AP: &lt;A href="https://thehivecommunity.aerohive.com/s/article/Collecting-Tech-Data-via-CLI" alt="https://thehivecommunity.aerohive.com/s/article/Collecting-Tech-Data-via-CLI" target="_blank"&gt;https://thehivecommunity.aerohive.com/s/article/Collecting-Tech-Data-via-CLI&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2019 19:39:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/aerohive-migrated-content/ap650-redundant-links-or-aggregate/m-p/70301#M4673</guid>
      <dc:creator>samantha_lynn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-08T19:39:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AP650  redundant links or aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/aerohive-migrated-content/ap650-redundant-links-or-aggregate/m-p/70302#M4674</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sorry for the delayed response.  I think this is a switch, configured as a virtual chassis issue and not the AP, but I attached the tech data you wanted.  Here's what I've discovered.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I ran all these test on the multi-gig ports on the switch except for the last one.  I also connected both ports on an AP630 to the multi-gig ports and it worked as expected.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;No VC + default config + Eth0 = pass&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;No VC + default config + Eth0 &amp;amp; Eth1 = pass&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;No VC + basic config + Eth0 = pass&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;No VC + basic config + Eth0 &amp;amp; Eth1 = pass&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VC + default config + Eth0 = pass&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VC + default config + Eth0 &amp;amp; Eth1 = fail&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VC + default config + Eth0 &amp;amp; Eth1 on gig switchports = fail&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2019 01:10:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/aerohive-migrated-content/ap650-redundant-links-or-aggregate/m-p/70302#M4674</guid>
      <dc:creator>jason_simmons</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-15T01:10:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AP650  redundant links or aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/aerohive-migrated-content/ap650-redundant-links-or-aggregate/m-p/70303#M4675</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your patience, I reviewed the data with our experts and they asked that we open a technical support case to move forward with this issue. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2019 01:35:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/aerohive-migrated-content/ap650-redundant-links-or-aggregate/m-p/70303#M4675</guid>
      <dc:creator>samantha_lynn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-22T01:35:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

