<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: NetIron CER 2048FX (IronWare : Version 6.0.0hT183 ) in Data Center (MLX &amp; CER/CES)</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/data-center-mlx-cer-ces/netiron-cer-2048fx-ironware-version-6-0-0ht183/m-p/92540#M228</link>
    <description>LAG Balancing Problem:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
PPPoE users &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; BRAS ( Routerboard ) &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; (4x1G LAG) &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; BGP Border  (CER 2048FX.)&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
When the load rises to 1G, the packets are lost and the traffic does not go to other ports.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2019 04:15:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>cjgun</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-08-01T04:15:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NetIron CER 2048FX (IronWare : Version 6.0.0hT183 )</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/data-center-mlx-cer-ces/netiron-cer-2048fx-ironware-version-6-0-0ht183/m-p/92533#M221</link>
      <description>In the instructions for setting up&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
netiron-6300a-switchingguide.pdf and netiron-05900a-switchingguide.pdf&lt;BR /&gt;
It is written to make LAG do the following:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Configuring the primary port for a LAG&lt;BR /&gt;
In previous versions of the Multi-Service IronWare software, the lowest number port was assigned as&lt;BR /&gt;
the primary port in a LAG or LACP configuration. In version 03.7.00 and later, the primary port must be&lt;BR /&gt;
explicitly assigned using the primary-port command.&lt;BR /&gt;
To designate the primary port for the static LAG "blue", use the following command.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
device(config)# lag blue static&lt;BR /&gt;
device(config-lag-blue)# primary-port 3/2&lt;BR /&gt;
Syntax:&lt;I&gt; [no] primary-port slot/port&lt;/I&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Once a primary port has been configured for a LAG, all configurations that apply to the primary port&lt;BR /&gt;
are applied to the other ports in the LAG.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Configuring load sharing type&lt;BR /&gt;
Individual LAGs can be configured to perform load sharing over the ports in the LAG using either a&lt;BR /&gt;
hash based or per packet method, as shown in the following.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
device(config)# lag blue static&lt;BR /&gt;
device(config-lag-blue)# trunk-type hash-based&lt;BR /&gt;
Syntax: &lt;I&gt;[no] trunk-type hash-based | per-packet&lt;/I&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
my config:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
lag "BRASDownlink" dynamic id 7&lt;BR /&gt;
 ports ethernet 1/41 to 1/42&lt;BR /&gt;
 primary-port 1/41&lt;BR /&gt;
 deploy&lt;BR /&gt;
 port-name "BRAStoP09" ethernet 1/41&lt;BR /&gt;
 port-name "BRAStoP10" ethernet 1/42&lt;BR /&gt;
!&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I do not have such teams. Who knows why?&lt;BR /&gt;
Only these:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
SSH@NetIron CER 2048FX(config-lag-BRASDownlink)&lt;BR /&gt;
 acl-mirror-port       &lt;BR /&gt;
 clear            &lt;BR /&gt;
 cls             &lt;BR /&gt;
 deploy           &lt;BR /&gt;
 disable           &lt;BR /&gt;
 enable           &lt;BR /&gt;
 end             &lt;BR /&gt;
 exit            &lt;BR /&gt;
 force-primary-port-mac-use &lt;BR /&gt;
 lacp-port-priority     &lt;BR /&gt;
 lacp-timeout        &lt;BR /&gt;
 monitor           &lt;BR /&gt;
 no             &lt;BR /&gt;
 physical-port        &lt;BR /&gt;
 port-name          &lt;BR /&gt;
 ports            &lt;BR /&gt;
 primary-port        &lt;BR /&gt;
 quit            &lt;BR /&gt;
 sflow-forwarding      &lt;BR /&gt;
 sflow-subsampling      &lt;BR /&gt;
 show            &lt;BR /&gt;
 trunk-threshold       &lt;BR /&gt;
 update-lag-name       &lt;BR /&gt;
 write</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 21:56:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/data-center-mlx-cer-ces/netiron-cer-2048fx-ironware-version-6-0-0ht183/m-p/92533#M221</guid>
      <dc:creator>cjgun</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-31T21:56:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NetIron CER 2048FX (IronWare : Version 6.0.0hT183 )</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/data-center-mlx-cer-ces/netiron-cer-2048fx-ironware-version-6-0-0ht183/m-p/92534#M222</link>
      <description>If I remember correctly, this command is only available on the XMR/MLX/MLXE, the CER/CES is hash-based by default.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 22:04:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/data-center-mlx-cer-ces/netiron-cer-2048fx-ironware-version-6-0-0ht183/m-p/92534#M222</guid>
      <dc:creator>joergkost</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-31T22:04:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NetIron CER 2048FX (IronWare : Version 6.0.0hT183 )</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/data-center-mlx-cer-ces/netiron-cer-2048fx-ironware-version-6-0-0ht183/m-p/92535#M223</link>
      <description>&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
SSH@NetIron CER 2048FX#sh lag BRASDownlink&lt;BR /&gt;
Total number of LAGs  : 4, 100/40g : 0&lt;BR /&gt;
Total number of deployed LAGs  : 4, 100/40g : 0&lt;BR /&gt;
Total number of trunks created : 4 (60 available), 100/40g : 0 (0 available)&lt;BR /&gt;
LACP System Priority / ID    :1 / 748e.f862.ca01&lt;BR /&gt;
LACP Long timeout    :90, default: 90&lt;BR /&gt;
LACP Short timeout   :3, default: 3&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
=== LAG "BRASDownlink" ID 7 (dynamic Deployed) ===&lt;BR /&gt;
LAG Configuration:&lt;BR /&gt;
  Ports:     e 1/41 to 1/42&lt;BR /&gt;
  Port Count:  2&lt;BR /&gt;
  Primary Port: 1/41&lt;BR /&gt;
 &lt;B&gt; Trunk Type:  hash-based&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
  forward_all_protocol: Disabled&lt;BR /&gt;
  LACP Key:   103&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
That is, I can not change to other options?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If I upload another firmware, for example XMR-MLX/06000g&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;B&gt;Supported devices for R06.0.00g&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
The following devices are supported in this release:&lt;BR /&gt;
ExtremeRouting XMR Series&lt;BR /&gt;
ExtremeRouting MLX Series&lt;BR /&gt;
ExtremeSwitching CES 2000 Series&lt;BR /&gt;
ExtremeRouting CER 2000 Series&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;B&gt;CER 2048FX&lt;/B&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 22:21:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/data-center-mlx-cer-ces/netiron-cer-2048fx-ironware-version-6-0-0ht183/m-p/92535#M223</guid>
      <dc:creator>cjgun</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-31T22:21:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NetIron CER 2048FX (IronWare : Version 6.0.0hT183 )</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/data-center-mlx-cer-ces/netiron-cer-2048fx-ironware-version-6-0-0ht183/m-p/92536#M224</link>
      <description>&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
That is correct.  The CER is set to Hash-Based by default and this command is only available on the Chassis based systems.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 22:25:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/data-center-mlx-cer-ces/netiron-cer-2048fx-ironware-version-6-0-0ht183/m-p/92536#M224</guid>
      <dc:creator>Michael_Morey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-31T22:25:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NetIron CER 2048FX (IronWare : Version 6.0.0hT183 )</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/data-center-mlx-cer-ces/netiron-cer-2048fx-ironware-version-6-0-0ht183/m-p/92537#M225</link>
      <description>I have 6.3a on MLX and CER, but these parameters are only visible on the MLX.  Inside the documentation the CER limitation is buried somewhere.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;DIV class="threadCode"&gt;&lt;B&gt;code:&lt;/B&gt;&lt;PRE spellcheck="false"&gt;MLX:&lt;BR /&gt;mlxe(config-lag-vdx-core)#trunk-type ?&lt;BR /&gt; hash-based  Hash based (default)&lt;BR /&gt; per-packet  Per packet&lt;BR /&gt;(config)#load-balance ?&lt;BR /&gt; force-l4-hashing   Force the use of L4 headers for trunk/ECMP hash&lt;BR /&gt;            calculations (IPv4/v6)&lt;BR /&gt; hash-diversify    Specify Trunk/ECMP Hash Diversification options&lt;BR /&gt; hash-rotate      Control the rotation of the ECMP hash&lt;BR /&gt; mask         Mask header fields for trunk/ECMP hash calculations&lt;BR /&gt; speculate-mpls-enet  Use L2 header for trunk index calculation (LSR and&lt;BR /&gt;            L2VPN PHP packets)&lt;BR /&gt; speculate-mpls-ip   Use IP header for trunk index calculation (LSR and&lt;BR /&gt;            L3VPN PHP packets)&lt;BR /&gt; symmetric       Symmetric fields for trunk hash calculations&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 22:26:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/data-center-mlx-cer-ces/netiron-cer-2048fx-ironware-version-6-0-0ht183/m-p/92537#M225</guid>
      <dc:creator>joergkost</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-31T22:26:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NetIron CER 2048FX (IronWare : Version 6.0.0hT183 )</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/data-center-mlx-cer-ces/netiron-cer-2048fx-ironware-version-6-0-0ht183/m-p/92538#M226</link>
      <description>How to make it work on the CER 2048FX.&lt;BR /&gt;
Need to buy a license or need to change сhassis ?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2019 00:53:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/data-center-mlx-cer-ces/netiron-cer-2048fx-ironware-version-6-0-0ht183/m-p/92538#M226</guid>
      <dc:creator>cjgun</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-01T00:53:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NetIron CER 2048FX (IronWare : Version 6.0.0hT183 )</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/data-center-mlx-cer-ces/netiron-cer-2048fx-ironware-version-6-0-0ht183/m-p/92539#M227</link>
      <description>It is more a  technical platform limit, not a license issue.  Is there any reason, that you need per-packet load balancing? &lt;BR /&gt;
I believe for the most use-cases, a hased-based load balancing is the better alternative.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2019 01:58:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/data-center-mlx-cer-ces/netiron-cer-2048fx-ironware-version-6-0-0ht183/m-p/92539#M227</guid>
      <dc:creator>joergkost</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-01T01:58:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NetIron CER 2048FX (IronWare : Version 6.0.0hT183 )</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/data-center-mlx-cer-ces/netiron-cer-2048fx-ironware-version-6-0-0ht183/m-p/92540#M228</link>
      <description>LAG Balancing Problem:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
PPPoE users &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; BRAS ( Routerboard ) &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; (4x1G LAG) &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; BGP Border  (CER 2048FX.)&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
When the load rises to 1G, the packets are lost and the traffic does not go to other ports.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2019 04:15:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/data-center-mlx-cer-ces/netiron-cer-2048fx-ironware-version-6-0-0ht183/m-p/92540#M228</guid>
      <dc:creator>cjgun</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-01T04:15:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

