<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Very Busy CloudIQ Map in ExtremeCloud IQ</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq/very-busy-cloudiq-map/m-p/97549#M3336</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I have been using CloudIQ to manage APs for almost two years.&amp;nbsp; We are a multi-campus K-12 district with 6 primary sites.&amp;nbsp; Our HS has 4 floors, and we have 130 APs on the main level of our HS.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As you can see, spitting 130 APs onto one "floor" makes a messy map. (blurred for opsec)&amp;nbsp; For a scale reference the length/width of the building is approx 700 ft North-South, 800 ft East-West.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-center" image-alt="blur Screenshot 2023-10-12 101157.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/6729iC16E7B86B1A6AB68/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="blur Screenshot 2023-10-12 101157.png" alt="blur Screenshot 2023-10-12 101157.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;As it stands, If I show a heat map it takes about 4 minutes for the map to refresh.&amp;nbsp; Forget about showing clients.&amp;nbsp; That would take an hour.&amp;nbsp; I am beginning to think that Heisenberg's uncertainty principal applies to AP clients as well as electrons.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I play it "straight", as I start adding CloudIQ managed wired switches it will not get any better.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am thinking that in the end, I will have to make dual sets of "Floors" for wired and wireless.&amp;nbsp; I am also considering breaking my HS into sub-buildings to make the client features workable.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anybody else tackled the problem of complex planning maps in XIQ?&amp;nbsp; Is there a feature I a missing, or a better strategy?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2023 14:39:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Keith_Obermeie1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-10-12T14:39:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Very Busy CloudIQ Map</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq/very-busy-cloudiq-map/m-p/97549#M3336</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have been using CloudIQ to manage APs for almost two years.&amp;nbsp; We are a multi-campus K-12 district with 6 primary sites.&amp;nbsp; Our HS has 4 floors, and we have 130 APs on the main level of our HS.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As you can see, spitting 130 APs onto one "floor" makes a messy map. (blurred for opsec)&amp;nbsp; For a scale reference the length/width of the building is approx 700 ft North-South, 800 ft East-West.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-center" image-alt="blur Screenshot 2023-10-12 101157.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/6729iC16E7B86B1A6AB68/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="blur Screenshot 2023-10-12 101157.png" alt="blur Screenshot 2023-10-12 101157.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;As it stands, If I show a heat map it takes about 4 minutes for the map to refresh.&amp;nbsp; Forget about showing clients.&amp;nbsp; That would take an hour.&amp;nbsp; I am beginning to think that Heisenberg's uncertainty principal applies to AP clients as well as electrons.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I play it "straight", as I start adding CloudIQ managed wired switches it will not get any better.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am thinking that in the end, I will have to make dual sets of "Floors" for wired and wireless.&amp;nbsp; I am also considering breaking my HS into sub-buildings to make the client features workable.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anybody else tackled the problem of complex planning maps in XIQ?&amp;nbsp; Is there a feature I a missing, or a better strategy?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2023 14:39:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq/very-busy-cloudiq-map/m-p/97549#M3336</guid>
      <dc:creator>Keith_Obermeie1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-12T14:39:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

