<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic XCC VE6120 ports: admin, data, vswitch promiscious mode in ExtremeCloud IQ Controller</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-controller/xcc-ve6120-ports-admin-data-vswitch-promiscious-mode/m-p/51026#M6</link>
    <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am installing a VE6120 and ended up with 3 interfaces (admin, data 1, data 2).&lt;BR /&gt;Admin is out of band - VLAN 10&lt;BR /&gt;Data 1, data 2 - VLAN 16.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;While the documentation is stating that the vswitch should accept promiscious connections, this doesn't seem to make sense.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Please correct me if I am wrong:&lt;BR /&gt;- data interfaces are used by APs and controller to talk to each other&lt;BR /&gt;- user traffic is locally switched&lt;BR /&gt;- no ther VLANs required on data ports&lt;BR /&gt;- global default gateway applies to Admin topology, static routes might be required for subnets that should be reachable via data ports / topology.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Klaus</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2021 03:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>tfsnetman</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-10-28T03:03:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>XCC VE6120 ports: admin, data, vswitch promiscious mode</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-controller/xcc-ve6120-ports-admin-data-vswitch-promiscious-mode/m-p/51026#M6</link>
      <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am installing a VE6120 and ended up with 3 interfaces (admin, data 1, data 2).&lt;BR /&gt;Admin is out of band - VLAN 10&lt;BR /&gt;Data 1, data 2 - VLAN 16.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;While the documentation is stating that the vswitch should accept promiscious connections, this doesn't seem to make sense.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Please correct me if I am wrong:&lt;BR /&gt;- data interfaces are used by APs and controller to talk to each other&lt;BR /&gt;- user traffic is locally switched&lt;BR /&gt;- no ther VLANs required on data ports&lt;BR /&gt;- global default gateway applies to Admin topology, static routes might be required for subnets that should be reachable via data ports / topology.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Klaus</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2021 03:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-controller/xcc-ve6120-ports-admin-data-vswitch-promiscious-mode/m-p/51026#M6</guid>
      <dc:creator>tfsnetman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-28T03:03:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: XCC VE6120 ports: admin, data, vswitch promiscious mode</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-controller/xcc-ve6120-ports-admin-data-vswitch-promiscious-mode/m-p/51027#M7</link>
      <description>&lt;EM&gt;Klaus, &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN class="test-id__field-value slds-form-element__static slds-grow " data-aura-rendered-by="274:987;a"&gt;&lt;EM&gt; The admin port should only be used as an &lt;B data-aura-rendered-by="266:987;a"&gt;out-of-band management&lt;/B&gt; port for GUI access only. &amp;nbsp;It should have no connectivity to the access points or the production data network.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;The following KB Articles should help you:- &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;1.Recommendations for configuring Extreme Campus Controller (XCC) ports in a VM&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; https://extremeportal.force.com/ExtrArticleDetail?an=000097639&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;2. How to configure vSwitch properties For V2110&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; https://extremeportal.force.com/ExtrArticleDetail?an=000084612 &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Regards,&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Sumeesh&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2021 08:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-controller/xcc-ve6120-ports-admin-data-vswitch-promiscious-mode/m-p/51027#M7</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vellachery__Sum</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-28T08:57:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: XCC VE6120 ports: admin, data, vswitch promiscious mode</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-controller/xcc-ve6120-ports-admin-data-vswitch-promiscious-mode/m-p/51028#M8</link>
      <description>Hi Sumesh,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you for getting back to me.&lt;BR /&gt;While the recommended setup is ideal when having a dedicated virtualised environmend for XCC, it's not really applicable when adding XCCs to an existing one.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;And since traffic is bridged at the AP / switch why would the controller need to see all traffic on all VLANs?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Klaus</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2021 08:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-controller/xcc-ve6120-ports-admin-data-vswitch-promiscious-mode/m-p/51028#M8</guid>
      <dc:creator>tfsnetman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-11-08T08:37:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

