<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Device Down Alerts Workflow in ExtremeCloud IQ- Site Engine Management Center</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/device-down-alerts-workflow/m-p/122374#M12948</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to create a work flow that will use the Topology Layer field, so that a L2 Access switch will check if there is a L3 Core/Distro switch down before alerting?&amp;nbsp; The goal would be to only get one alert for the distro switch and not 40 alerts for every connected switch.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 18:21:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>troy_alan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-08-24T18:21:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Device Down Alerts Workflow</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/device-down-alerts-workflow/m-p/122374#M12948</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to create a work flow that will use the Topology Layer field, so that a L2 Access switch will check if there is a L3 Core/Distro switch down before alerting?&amp;nbsp; The goal would be to only get one alert for the distro switch and not 40 alerts for every connected switch.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 18:21:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/device-down-alerts-workflow/m-p/122374#M12948</guid>
      <dc:creator>troy_alan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-08-24T18:21:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

