<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Channel utilization – Not important for EMC-Netsight? in ExtremeCloud IQ- Site Engine Management Center</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/channel-utilization-not-important-for-emc-netsight/m-p/36127#M4158</link>
    <description>Looking for software for  monitoring our university wireless network based on Extreme Network  wireless controller V2110 and mostly APs 3805i,  I am testing EMC Netsight 8.0.3.53. Entering the  menu Wireless/Access Points I get a nice table of all APs with IP and MAC  Address, Channels, Peak Wired and Wireless Bandwidth and Peak Clients. But  where are the statistics for Channel Utilization?  For me as a network administrator Channel  Utilization is an important metric to evaluate the health of my wireless  network. I was told that in order to get data about Channel Utilization one has  to get the most advanced (and expensive) version of EMC, NMS-ADV-XX .  Really?  &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
    Inside of NMS-ADV-XX you  can create custom reports about channel utilization but have to do it for each  radio of each AP. If your network has 500 APs with two radios, you have to  create 1000 components, which can then be combined in the Report Designer to a  custom report. There is no way (at least I couldn’t find one) to have a simple  table of all APs and their actual Channel Utilization or a list of APs with the  highest Channel Utilization.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
    So, why is Channel Utilization not important for  EMC Netsight? Why do they have to hide this feature in the NMS-ADV-XX version?  Why can’t I have a list of all APs with wired/wireless bandwidth and Channel  utilization at the same time without creating a complicate custom report? I am also  testing LibreNMS, a wonderful open source network monitoring solution. Entering  the wireless menu, I can choose the display of APs, Clients, Utilization, SNR,  RSSI, Noise Floor, Errors and Frequency. So, if LibreNMS can do this, why not  EMC Netsight?  &lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2018 20:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Thomas_Hucke</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-04-12T20:16:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Channel utilization – Not important for EMC-Netsight?</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/channel-utilization-not-important-for-emc-netsight/m-p/36127#M4158</link>
      <description>Looking for software for  monitoring our university wireless network based on Extreme Network  wireless controller V2110 and mostly APs 3805i,  I am testing EMC Netsight 8.0.3.53. Entering the  menu Wireless/Access Points I get a nice table of all APs with IP and MAC  Address, Channels, Peak Wired and Wireless Bandwidth and Peak Clients. But  where are the statistics for Channel Utilization?  For me as a network administrator Channel  Utilization is an important metric to evaluate the health of my wireless  network. I was told that in order to get data about Channel Utilization one has  to get the most advanced (and expensive) version of EMC, NMS-ADV-XX .  Really?  &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
    Inside of NMS-ADV-XX you  can create custom reports about channel utilization but have to do it for each  radio of each AP. If your network has 500 APs with two radios, you have to  create 1000 components, which can then be combined in the Report Designer to a  custom report. There is no way (at least I couldn’t find one) to have a simple  table of all APs and their actual Channel Utilization or a list of APs with the  highest Channel Utilization.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
    So, why is Channel Utilization not important for  EMC Netsight? Why do they have to hide this feature in the NMS-ADV-XX version?  Why can’t I have a list of all APs with wired/wireless bandwidth and Channel  utilization at the same time without creating a complicate custom report? I am also  testing LibreNMS, a wonderful open source network monitoring solution. Entering  the wireless menu, I can choose the display of APs, Clients, Utilization, SNR,  RSSI, Noise Floor, Errors and Frequency. So, if LibreNMS can do this, why not  EMC Netsight?  &lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2018 20:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/channel-utilization-not-important-for-emc-netsight/m-p/36127#M4158</guid>
      <dc:creator>Thomas_Hucke</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-12T20:16:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Channel utilization – Not important for EMC-Netsight?</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/channel-utilization-not-important-for-emc-netsight/m-p/36128#M4159</link>
      <description>Hello Thomas,&lt;BR /&gt;
you might get the data you are looking for with the FlexView "Wireless Radios"&lt;BR /&gt;
Device-View / Right Click on the controller, View/FlexView and choose the "Wireless Radios"&lt;BR /&gt;
On the FlexView you can manage the Columns which should be displayed as you click on the little triangle on the heading and you can add more or less infos to your report.&lt;BR /&gt;
Does this Data help you.&lt;BR /&gt;
regards&lt;BR /&gt;
Bastian&lt;BR /&gt;
-&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2018 20:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/channel-utilization-not-important-for-emc-netsight/m-p/36128#M4159</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bastian_Sprotte</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-12T20:57:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Channel utilization – Not important for EMC-Netsight?</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/channel-utilization-not-important-for-emc-netsight/m-p/36129#M4160</link>
      <description>Hi Bastion,&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks for the hint. The table which  Flexview of  "Wireless Radio" produces  shows information about channel information but I don't know how to relate it to an specific AP. The column "IP Address" has always the IP address of the controller and there are no columns which identifies the AP or radio of this particular channel utilization value. What do I missing here?&lt;BR /&gt;
Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;
Thomas.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2018 21:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/channel-utilization-not-important-for-emc-netsight/m-p/36129#M4160</guid>
      <dc:creator>Thomas_Hucke</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-12T21:34:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Channel utilization – Not important for EMC-Netsight?</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/channel-utilization-not-important-for-emc-netsight/m-p/36130#M4161</link>
      <description>Hi Thomas,&lt;BR /&gt;
you are correct, the flexview needs to be reviewed and needs to have the AP NAME added.&lt;BR /&gt;
In case you want to know which line is what, the report you have now has an columns called "instance" the instance is the ifIndex, just open an new flexview and click on &lt;BR /&gt;
Controller-IP&amp;gt; Device/R-click/View-&amp;gt;Interfaces.&lt;BR /&gt;
Now the Interface ID is the reverence to the "instance".&lt;BR /&gt;
again we can change the flexview for sure, but as workaround you can see the AP-Radius via the IfIndex.&lt;BR /&gt;
regards&lt;BR /&gt;
Bastian&lt;BR /&gt;
-&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2018 21:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/channel-utilization-not-important-for-emc-netsight/m-p/36130#M4161</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bastian_Sprotte</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-12T21:51:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Channel utilization – Not important for EMC-Netsight?</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/channel-utilization-not-important-for-emc-netsight/m-p/36131#M4162</link>
      <description>Hi Bastion,&lt;BR /&gt;
I got it. I think, that for an admin, who wants to have a quick overview about the health of his wireless network - and I consider Channel Utilization as an very important metric for this purpose - EMC is pretty cumbersome and should be improved. IMHO software should help the life of an admin and not make it more complicate. &lt;BR /&gt;
BTW, what exactly does "Speed" of the wireless interface exactly mean?  Our 802.11a/n/ac radios show a speed of 54 Mbps and 802.11g/n only 11 Mps.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;
Thomas.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2018 22:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/channel-utilization-not-important-for-emc-netsight/m-p/36131#M4162</guid>
      <dc:creator>Thomas_Hucke</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-12T22:17:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Channel utilization – Not important for EMC-Netsight?</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/channel-utilization-not-important-for-emc-netsight/m-p/36132#M4163</link>
      <description>You'd ignore the Speed for the AP interface because every connected client will get a different connection rate which depend on many factors like signal strenght, SNR, client adapter, range.....&lt;BR /&gt;
I assume that 54/11 is just a general value - in that case the max. speed of the lowest 802.11 radio standard of the 2.4 and 5 GHz radio.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2018 22:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/channel-utilization-not-important-for-emc-netsight/m-p/36132#M4163</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ronald_Dvorak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-12T22:17:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Channel utilization – Not important for EMC-Netsight?</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/channel-utilization-not-important-for-emc-netsight/m-p/36133#M4164</link>
      <description>Ronald, &lt;BR /&gt;
I appreciate your response.&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thomas.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2018 22:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/channel-utilization-not-important-for-emc-netsight/m-p/36133#M4164</guid>
      <dc:creator>Thomas_Hucke</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-12T22:17:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Channel utilization – Not important for EMC-Netsight?</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/channel-utilization-not-important-for-emc-netsight/m-p/36134#M4165</link>
      <description>I'd prefer a full integration of the channel util counters because the main reason to use XMC instead of the controller GUI for reports is the ability to look into the stored historical data in XMC.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2018 23:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/channel-utilization-not-important-for-emc-netsight/m-p/36134#M4165</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ronald_Dvorak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-12T23:33:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Channel utilization – Not important for EMC-Netsight?</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/channel-utilization-not-important-for-emc-netsight/m-p/36135#M4166</link>
      <description>Exactly, and I don't see any need to purchase the most expensive version of XMC (NMS-ADV) just to get historical information about channel utilization. LibreNMS provides historical data about channel just using SNMP, and for free.&lt;BR /&gt;
Regards,</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2018 23:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/channel-utilization-not-important-for-emc-netsight/m-p/36135#M4166</guid>
      <dc:creator>Thomas_Hucke</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-12T23:39:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

