<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic RE: NAC physical connectivity in ExtremeCloud IQ- Site Engine Management Center</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/nac-physical-connectivity/m-p/18642#M756</link>
    <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks for your answer. My purpose is to have redundant connection in case the port that NAC connected to failed. Is there any advice regarding this purpose.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks&lt;BR /&gt;
Husam</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2016 18:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Husam</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-04-18T18:10:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NAC physical connectivity</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/nac-physical-connectivity/m-p/18639#M753</link>
      <description>Hi all,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Is there a way to physically connect NAC IA-A-330-2 using LAG as it has 4 Ethernet ports?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks in advance!&lt;BR /&gt;
Husam</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2016 11:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/nac-physical-connectivity/m-p/18639#M753</guid>
      <dc:creator>Husam</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-18T11:29:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: NAC physical connectivity</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/nac-physical-connectivity/m-p/18640#M754</link>
      <description>Hi.    I do not believe it is supported, but there is linux ubuntu inside. You can try.    Z.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2016 11:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/nac-physical-connectivity/m-p/18640#M754</guid>
      <dc:creator>Zdeněk_Pala</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-18T11:34:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: NAC physical connectivity</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/nac-physical-connectivity/m-p/18641#M755</link>
      <description>Husam,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
No, that is not a supported configuration. Also there is no real need for the LAG since the IA-A-300 is used in an out-of-band manner. You should never come anywhere near utilization that would would require more bandwidth than the standard gig port.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Tyler</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2016 18:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/nac-physical-connectivity/m-p/18641#M755</guid>
      <dc:creator>TylerMarcotte</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-18T18:10:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: NAC physical connectivity</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/nac-physical-connectivity/m-p/18642#M756</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks for your answer. My purpose is to have redundant connection in case the port that NAC connected to failed. Is there any advice regarding this purpose.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks&lt;BR /&gt;
Husam</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2016 18:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/nac-physical-connectivity/m-p/18642#M756</guid>
      <dc:creator>Husam</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-18T18:10:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

