<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: XMC/Switches (EXOS) - Topology/Sites/Maps - Recommendations/best practice in ExtremeCloud IQ- Site Engine Management Center</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/xmc-switches-exos-topology-sites-maps-recommendations-best/m-p/67176#M7886</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Miguel,&lt;/P&gt;  &lt;P&gt;I’m so sorry for my insanely late reply!! Not sure why, but the e-mail notification from the community&amp;nbsp;slipped my eyes…&lt;/P&gt;  &lt;P&gt;Thanks for the clarification/confirmation, you are spot-on! I kind of figured this out on my own last week, but it’s nice to know that my testing is the correct/only way. For me it all got easier once I figured out that a device can be present i multiple maps (like you are writing).&lt;/P&gt;  &lt;P&gt;Thanks again.&lt;/P&gt;  &lt;P&gt;All the best!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2020 01:56:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>kaare_t</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-05-25T01:56:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>XMC/Switches (EXOS) - Topology/Sites/Maps - Recommendations/best practice</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/xmc-switches-exos-topology-sites-maps-recommendations-best/m-p/67174#M7884</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello all,&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;We’ve just recently purchased XMC, I’m currently configuring everything and I’m not sure what would be the best approach regarding sites/maps. For now, we are only polling our EXOS switches (X440/X440-G2/X620/ISW). We don’t have a large logical network and everything is on the same physical location (however our physical location is spread on an area of appr. 90000 sqm). Logically we are “one site”.&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;We have two central rooms with 10Gbit links inside and in-between (all redundant using 2-tier MLAG):&lt;/P&gt; &lt;OL type="1"&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Serverrom-1 (Office)&lt;/LI&gt; &lt;LI&gt;Serverrom-2 (Factory)&lt;/LI&gt; &lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Spread out on our site we also have:&lt;/P&gt; &lt;OL type="1"&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Appr. 8 locations with X440/X440-G2 switches for various departments (some 2-tier MLAG)&lt;/LI&gt; &lt;LI&gt;22&amp;nbsp;industrial switches (ISW) in the factory itself (all connected to Serverrom-2 MLAG ports)&lt;/LI&gt; &lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;I’ve tried understanding how the “Sites/Maps” work in XMC, but I’m not exactly sure what would be the best approach. Our main-goal with using the Sites/Maps is to get a better visual overview. Should I start with logical Sites/Maps, or physical Sites/Maps? With the small amount of switches we have, would it be better to just create one “large” map that handles all switches (possibly except the ISW)? Or should I create maps for each physical location on our site?&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;Are there advantages of creating “many” maps?&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance for any pointers!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2020 20:00:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/xmc-switches-exos-topology-sites-maps-recommendations-best/m-p/67174#M7884</guid>
      <dc:creator>kaare_t</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-08T20:00:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: XMC/Switches (EXOS) - Topology/Sites/Maps - Recommendations/best practice</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/xmc-switches-exos-topology-sites-maps-recommendations-best/m-p/67175#M7885</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;kaare,&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;You are talking about switches =&amp;gt; you can create topology maps only.&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;The other type of maps is floor plans used for wifi coverage.&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;Topology map as his name says is a topology =&amp;gt; physical view with switches and port numbers.&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;The golden rule for maps is: if it is good for you, it is good. That’s it.&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;I personally use multiple maps when there are different physical locations and create a WAN map showing the global routers/switches interconnecting the sites.&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;Mig&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2020 14:17:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/xmc-switches-exos-topology-sites-maps-recommendations-best/m-p/67175#M7885</guid>
      <dc:creator>Miguel-Angel_RO</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-09T14:17:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: XMC/Switches (EXOS) - Topology/Sites/Maps - Recommendations/best practice</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/xmc-switches-exos-topology-sites-maps-recommendations-best/m-p/67176#M7886</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Miguel,&lt;/P&gt;  &lt;P&gt;I’m so sorry for my insanely late reply!! Not sure why, but the e-mail notification from the community&amp;nbsp;slipped my eyes…&lt;/P&gt;  &lt;P&gt;Thanks for the clarification/confirmation, you are spot-on! I kind of figured this out on my own last week, but it’s nice to know that my testing is the correct/only way. For me it all got easier once I figured out that a device can be present i multiple maps (like you are writing).&lt;/P&gt;  &lt;P&gt;Thanks again.&lt;/P&gt;  &lt;P&gt;All the best!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2020 01:56:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/xmc-switches-exos-topology-sites-maps-recommendations-best/m-p/67176#M7886</guid>
      <dc:creator>kaare_t</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-25T01:56:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

