<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Device Port Tree view missing ports in ExtremeCloud IQ- Site Engine Management Center</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/device-port-tree-view-missing-ports/m-p/98028#M9986</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for suggestion. Perhaps when I upgrade this XMC 8.5 system to XIQ-SE problem may be fixed. What is funny is the fact that when I've connected this firewall for the first time to NMS using SNMPv2&amp;nbsp; Profile the "Port Tree" view was OK&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 14:10:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Bartek</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-11-21T14:10:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Device Port Tree view missing ports</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/device-port-tree-view-missing-ports/m-p/98013#M9979</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have on customer site Palo Alto 5200 firewall (PAN OS 10.2) connected to NMS using SNMP V3 (Auth/Priv: SHA/AES) with loaded custom Palo Alto SNMP MIBS for PAN OS 10.2 in MyMibs folder.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In "Port Tree" view I see only a few ports but when I switch to "Interface Summary View" I see a complete device port list (with logical interfaces like aggregation and tunnel as well).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Port Tree view:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Bartek_1-1700486957430.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/6816i585C4198437C3ED3/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Bartek_1-1700486957430.png" alt="Bartek_1-1700486957430.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Interface Summary view:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Bartek_0-1700486897672.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/6815i01179D350B7FC707/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Bartek_0-1700486897672.png" alt="Bartek_0-1700486897672.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As far as I understand if I want to create manually some links in Network Maps with this firewall I need to have device interfaces in "Port Tree" view to be able to do it. Do you have any idea how to fix it?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2023 13:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/device-port-tree-view-missing-ports/m-p/98013#M9979</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bartek</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-20T13:37:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Device Port Tree view missing ports</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/device-port-tree-view-missing-ports/m-p/98025#M9985</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You are correct that if you want to be able to manually create links on maps the full port list being available would be necessary.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I do not understand the different why Port View vs Interface Summary produces different results. I would have to see SNMP style traces or model the updates for both to see a difference in behavior.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This would be something I would advise you to open a GTAC case for if necessary.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 13:35:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/device-port-tree-view-missing-ports/m-p/98025#M9985</guid>
      <dc:creator>Robert_Haynes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-21T13:35:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Device Port Tree view missing ports</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/device-port-tree-view-missing-ports/m-p/98028#M9986</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for suggestion. Perhaps when I upgrade this XMC 8.5 system to XIQ-SE problem may be fixed. What is funny is the fact that when I've connected this firewall for the first time to NMS using SNMPv2&amp;nbsp; Profile the "Port Tree" view was OK&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 14:10:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/device-port-tree-view-missing-ports/m-p/98028#M9986</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bartek</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-21T14:10:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Device Port Tree view missing ports</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/device-port-tree-view-missing-ports/m-p/98040#M9987</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is this suggesting that you since switched to SNMPv3 and the results are now limited as you originally described? If yes, does the SNMPv3 configuration on the firewall have a limited or restricted view that is preventing access to certain OIDs? I can't see us polling OID's differently based on SNMP protocol; only that SNMPv3 has the ability to restrict requests to specific OID trees, etc.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2023 13:44:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/device-port-tree-view-missing-ports/m-p/98040#M9987</guid>
      <dc:creator>Robert_Haynes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-22T13:44:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Device Port Tree view missing ports</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/device-port-tree-view-missing-ports/m-p/98063#M9989</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;SNMPv3 OID Permissions in Firewall for this SNMP user were set with 0x80 mask so it shouldn't be a problem (any 1.X should be available). Now when I moved back to SNMPv2c there is still only limited Port Tree view. I've tried also deleting and re-adding device again to NMS but unfortunately with no success. Next week I'll upgrade this XMC to XIQ-SE and hope it fix the issue&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2023 13:36:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/device-port-tree-view-missing-ports/m-p/98063#M9989</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bartek</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-24T13:36:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Device Port Tree view missing ports</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/device-port-tree-view-missing-ports/m-p/98110#M9991</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I've tested in my lab PA-820 with XIQ-SE&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;23.7.11.6 and I've got this same problem - "Interfaces view" is OK but "Port Tree" is not:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Bartek_0-1701087618159.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/6840iCC4246AA9229F6FC/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Bartek_0-1701087618159.png" alt="Bartek_0-1701087618159.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Bartek_1-1701087629940.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/6841iEAE4E3DBA0E31EE3/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Bartek_1-1701087629940.png" alt="Bartek_1-1701087629940.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2023 12:21:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/device-port-tree-view-missing-ports/m-p/98110#M9991</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bartek</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-27T12:21:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Device Port Tree view missing ports</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/device-port-tree-view-missing-ports/m-p/98124#M9992</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you do continue to encounter the issue I would suggest opening a case with GTAC. The screenshots you provided indeed show a discrepancy between the two tables and they should essentially be identical in terms of the # of interfaces/ports shown. SNMP 'tcpdump' traces taken when opening each view would be a good data point to start with.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2023 14:05:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecloud-iq-site-engine/device-port-tree-view-missing-ports/m-p/98124#M9992</guid>
      <dc:creator>Robert_Haynes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-27T14:05:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

