<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Phones, NAC and VLAN assignment (data &amp;amp; voice untagged?) in ExtremeControl</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecontrol/phones-nac-and-vlan-assignment-data-amp-voice-untagged/m-p/94241#M349</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Ok, so how do we force the phone to use tagged traffic without knowing the VLAN/I-SID in advance as we host several phone networks and several PBXes &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2022 20:10:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jeronimo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-12-28T20:10:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Phones, NAC and VLAN assignment (data &amp; voice untagged?)</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecontrol/phones-nac-and-vlan-assignment-data-amp-voice-untagged/m-p/94235#M347</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Working on NAC, phones and PCs are daisy-chained.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With static configuration (LLDP/voice-vlan), phone traffic is usually tagged on voice vlan/i-sid.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With NAC, both data and voice traffic is untagged and MHMV (multi-host multi-vlan) seems to kick in.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this the right thing to do? Any drawbacks? Both hosts see each other's broadcast traffic for example I guess. Any way to have no static configuration and have the voice VLAN tagged still?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How are you guys doing this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Platform is VOSS/FabricEngine. Version: 8.8 (FE) / 22.9 (XIQ-SE).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BR,&lt;BR /&gt;Marki&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2022 09:16:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecontrol/phones-nac-and-vlan-assignment-data-amp-voice-untagged/m-p/94235#M347</guid>
      <dc:creator>jeronimo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-28T09:16:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Phones, NAC and VLAN assignment (data &amp; voice untagged?)</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecontrol/phones-nac-and-vlan-assignment-data-amp-voice-untagged/m-p/94240#M348</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In the past, some phones were heavily impacted by multicast and broadcast traffic. If the phone data can be separated by VLAN tag then the phone was much happier.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2022 20:06:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecontrol/phones-nac-and-vlan-assignment-data-amp-voice-untagged/m-p/94240#M348</guid>
      <dc:creator>Zdeněk_Pala</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-28T20:06:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Phones, NAC and VLAN assignment (data &amp; voice untagged?)</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecontrol/phones-nac-and-vlan-assignment-data-amp-voice-untagged/m-p/94241#M349</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ok, so how do we force the phone to use tagged traffic without knowing the VLAN/I-SID in advance as we host several phone networks and several PBXes &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2022 20:10:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremecontrol/phones-nac-and-vlan-assignment-data-amp-voice-untagged/m-p/94241#M349</guid>
      <dc:creator>jeronimo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-28T20:10:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

