<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Link aggregation Summit X690 Vs Enterasys N-Series in ExtremeSwitching (EOS)</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-eos/link-aggregation-summit-x690-vs-enterasys-n-series/m-p/59483#M1604</link>
    <description>Hello i am making a Link agregation : summit X690 Vs Enterasys N7.&lt;BR /&gt;
Configuration of Summit:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
configure sharing 1:1 add ports 1:1,1:2Configuration Enterasys N-7&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
set port vlan ge.3.24-25;lag.0.62 1 modify-egress&lt;BR /&gt;
set vlan egress 2-100 lag.0.62;ge.3.23-24;ge.5.23-24 tagged&lt;BR /&gt;
set lacp aadminkey lag.0.62 62&lt;BR /&gt;
set port lacp port ge.3.24 aadminkey 62&lt;BR /&gt;
set port lacp port ge.3.25 aadminkey 62&lt;BR /&gt;
set lacp singleportlag enable&lt;BR /&gt;
set lacp enable&lt;BR /&gt;
set port lacp port ge.3.24-25 enable&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
When i do a :&lt;BR /&gt;
show port status lag.0.62&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Port         Alias            Oper     Admin   Speed  Duplex  Type&lt;BR /&gt;
             (truncated)      Status   Status  (bps)&lt;BR /&gt;
------------ ---------------- -------- ------- ------ ------- ------------------&lt;BR /&gt;
lag.0.62                      down     up                     lag               &lt;BR /&gt;
1 of 1 ports displayed, 0 port(s) with oper status 'up' or 'dormant'.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
XXXXXX(su)-&amp;gt;show lacp lag.0.62&lt;BR /&gt;
Global Link Aggregation state: enabled &lt;BR /&gt;
Single Port LAGs:              enabled &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Aggregator:  lag.0.62&lt;BR /&gt;
                          Actor                 Partner&lt;BR /&gt;
System Identifier:  00:1f:45:d4:0f:5a      00:00:00:00:00:00&lt;BR /&gt;
  System Priority:              32768                  32768&lt;BR /&gt;
        Admin Key:                 62&lt;BR /&gt;
         Oper Key:                 62                  32768&lt;BR /&gt;
   Attached Ports:  None.&lt;BR /&gt;
    Standby Ports:  None.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I not see atacched ports in the link aggregation What could be happening? Missing Command?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 23:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Elena_Madrigal</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-11-24T23:57:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Link aggregation Summit X690 Vs Enterasys N-Series</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-eos/link-aggregation-summit-x690-vs-enterasys-n-series/m-p/59483#M1604</link>
      <description>Hello i am making a Link agregation : summit X690 Vs Enterasys N7.&lt;BR /&gt;
Configuration of Summit:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
configure sharing 1:1 add ports 1:1,1:2Configuration Enterasys N-7&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
set port vlan ge.3.24-25;lag.0.62 1 modify-egress&lt;BR /&gt;
set vlan egress 2-100 lag.0.62;ge.3.23-24;ge.5.23-24 tagged&lt;BR /&gt;
set lacp aadminkey lag.0.62 62&lt;BR /&gt;
set port lacp port ge.3.24 aadminkey 62&lt;BR /&gt;
set port lacp port ge.3.25 aadminkey 62&lt;BR /&gt;
set lacp singleportlag enable&lt;BR /&gt;
set lacp enable&lt;BR /&gt;
set port lacp port ge.3.24-25 enable&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
When i do a :&lt;BR /&gt;
show port status lag.0.62&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Port         Alias            Oper     Admin   Speed  Duplex  Type&lt;BR /&gt;
             (truncated)      Status   Status  (bps)&lt;BR /&gt;
------------ ---------------- -------- ------- ------ ------- ------------------&lt;BR /&gt;
lag.0.62                      down     up                     lag               &lt;BR /&gt;
1 of 1 ports displayed, 0 port(s) with oper status 'up' or 'dormant'.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
XXXXXX(su)-&amp;gt;show lacp lag.0.62&lt;BR /&gt;
Global Link Aggregation state: enabled &lt;BR /&gt;
Single Port LAGs:              enabled &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Aggregator:  lag.0.62&lt;BR /&gt;
                          Actor                 Partner&lt;BR /&gt;
System Identifier:  00:1f:45:d4:0f:5a      00:00:00:00:00:00&lt;BR /&gt;
  System Priority:              32768                  32768&lt;BR /&gt;
        Admin Key:                 62&lt;BR /&gt;
         Oper Key:                 62                  32768&lt;BR /&gt;
   Attached Ports:  None.&lt;BR /&gt;
    Standby Ports:  None.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I not see atacched ports in the link aggregation What could be happening? Missing Command?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 23:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-eos/link-aggregation-summit-x690-vs-enterasys-n-series/m-p/59483#M1604</guid>
      <dc:creator>Elena_Madrigal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-24T23:57:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Link aggregation Summit X690 Vs Enterasys N-Series</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-eos/link-aggregation-summit-x690-vs-enterasys-n-series/m-p/59484#M1605</link>
      <description>Hi Elena,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Maybe you can use the following command on EXOS just to check if you haven't created a STATIC LAG on the Purple side, while an LACP LAG on the Red side:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
show sharing&lt;BR /&gt;
Maybe adding the &lt;I&gt;lacp&lt;/I&gt; parameter should help...&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
configure sharing 1:1 add ports 1:1,1:2 lacp&lt;BR /&gt;
Best regards,&lt;BR /&gt;
-Leo</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2017 08:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-eos/link-aggregation-summit-x690-vs-enterasys-n-series/m-p/59484#M1605</guid>
      <dc:creator>LeoP1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-25T08:47:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Link aggregation Summit X690 Vs Enterasys N-Series</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-eos/link-aggregation-summit-x690-vs-enterasys-n-series/m-p/59485#M1606</link>
      <description>Thanks Leo, with lacp command at the end not work, I think that the problem is in the Enterasys configuration. Not in the summit. What do you think?&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2017 19:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-eos/link-aggregation-summit-x690-vs-enterasys-n-series/m-p/59485#M1606</guid>
      <dc:creator>Elena_Madrigal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-25T19:25:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Link aggregation Summit X690 Vs Enterasys N-Series</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-eos/link-aggregation-summit-x690-vs-enterasys-n-series/m-p/59486#M1607</link>
      <description>Please try with following command on x690:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;B&gt;enable sharing 1:1 grouping 1:1-2 lacp&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
In the meanwhile, are you using x690 switches as stacking? When looking at the port name 1:1 of x690 switch, it is the name of ports when using stacking.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 07:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-eos/link-aggregation-summit-x690-vs-enterasys-n-series/m-p/59486#M1607</guid>
      <dc:creator>David_Choi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-27T07:44:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Link aggregation Summit X690 Vs Enterasys N-Series</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-eos/link-aggregation-summit-x690-vs-enterasys-n-series/m-p/59487#M1608</link>
      <description>Hi Elena,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
perhaps one line of the N-Series configuration is not correct?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;set vlan egress 2-100 lag.0.62;ge.3.23-24;ge.5.23-24 tagged&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;All other lines use ports ge.3.&lt;B&gt;24-25&lt;/B&gt;, but the above line uses ge.3.&lt;B&gt;23-24&lt;/B&gt;.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Using your EOS commands on an SSA (different port numbers, of course) and adding the &lt;I&gt;&lt;B&gt;lacp&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/I&gt; keyword to the EXOS commands, I could configure an LAG between an X460-G2 and an SSA.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Did you enable the ports on the N-Series (and the EXOS switch as well)? What output results from the command &lt;I&gt;&lt;B&gt;show port status ge.3.24-25;lag.0.62 &lt;/B&gt;&lt;/I&gt;on the N7? If I disable the physical ports comprising the LAG on the SSA, the &lt;I&gt;&lt;B&gt;show lacp lag.0.62&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/I&gt; output shows &lt;I&gt;Attached Ports:  None&lt;/I&gt;.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
We could probably help better, if you could provide the output of the following commands:&lt;OL&gt; 
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;I&gt;(N7)&lt;/I&gt; show port status ge.3.24-25;lag.0.62 
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;I&gt;(N7)&lt;/I&gt; show port lacp port ge.3.24-25 status detail 
 
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;I&gt;(N7)&lt;/I&gt; show lacp lag.0.62 
 
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;(X690) show port status 1:1-2 no-refresh 
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;(X690) show sharing 
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;(X690) show lacp lag 1:1     &lt;I&gt;# I am not sure if the LAG group-id is 1 or 1:1&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;
Erik</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 20:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-eos/link-aggregation-summit-x690-vs-enterasys-n-series/m-p/59487#M1608</guid>
      <dc:creator>Erik_Auerswald</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-27T20:25:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Link aggregation Summit X690 Vs Enterasys N-Series</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-eos/link-aggregation-summit-x690-vs-enterasys-n-series/m-p/59488#M1609</link>
      <description>Lag group-id is "1:1" in this case.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 20:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-eos/link-aggregation-summit-x690-vs-enterasys-n-series/m-p/59488#M1609</guid>
      <dc:creator>David_Choi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-27T20:25:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Link aggregation Summit X690 Vs Enterasys N-Series</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-eos/link-aggregation-summit-x690-vs-enterasys-n-series/m-p/59489#M1610</link>
      <description>Thanks. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 20:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-eos/link-aggregation-summit-x690-vs-enterasys-n-series/m-p/59489#M1610</guid>
      <dc:creator>Erik_Auerswald</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-27T20:25:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Link aggregation Summit X690 Vs Enterasys N-Series</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-eos/link-aggregation-summit-x690-vs-enterasys-n-series/m-p/59490#M1611</link>
      <description>Hello I have only one port attached for the test this is the output commands&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
================== N7 COMMANDS=================&lt;BR /&gt;
VITSCOA1(su)-&amp;gt;show port status ge.3.24-25;lag.0.62  &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Port         Alias            Oper     Admin   Speed  Duplex  Type&lt;BR /&gt;
             (truncated)      Status   Status  (bps)&lt;BR /&gt;
------------ ---------------- -------- ------- ------ ------- ------------------&lt;BR /&gt;
ge.3.24      LAG              up       up        1.0G full    1000-t       rj45 &lt;BR /&gt;
ge.3.25      LAG              down     up      100.0M full    100-tx       rj45 &lt;BR /&gt;
lag.0.62     LAG              down     up                     lag               &lt;BR /&gt;
3 of 3 ports displayed, 1 port(s) with oper status 'up' or 'dormant'.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
VITSCOA1(su)-&amp;gt;show port lacp port ge.3.24-25 status detail&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Global Link Aggregation state : enabled&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Port Instance:               ge.3.24  Port enable state:                Enabled&lt;BR /&gt;
ActorPort:                       600  PartnerAdminPort:                     600&lt;BR /&gt;
ActorSystemPriority:           32768  PartnerOperPort:                      600&lt;BR /&gt;
ActorPortPriority:             32768  PartnerAdminSystemPriority:         32768&lt;BR /&gt;
ActorAdminKey:                    62  PartnerOperSystemPriority:          32768&lt;BR /&gt;
ActorOperKey:                     62  PartnerAdminPortPriority:           32768&lt;BR /&gt;
ActorAdminState:            -----GlA  PartnerOperPortPriority:            32768&lt;BR /&gt;
ActorOperState:             -F---GlA  PartnerAdminKey:                      600&lt;BR /&gt;
ActorSystemID:     00-1f-45-d4-0f-5a  PartnerOperKey:                       600&lt;BR /&gt;
SelectedAggID:                  none  PartnerAdminState:               --DCS-lp&lt;BR /&gt;
AttachedAggID:                  none  PartnerOperState:                --DCS-lp&lt;BR /&gt;
MuxState:                   Detached  PartnerAdminSystemID:   00-00-00-00-00-00&lt;BR /&gt;
DebugRxState:              Defaulted  PartnerOperSystemID:    00-00-00-00-00-00&lt;BR /&gt;
portStandbyReason:              none&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Port Instance:               ge.3.25  Port enable state:                Enabled&lt;BR /&gt;
ActorPort:                       601  PartnerAdminPort:                     601&lt;BR /&gt;
ActorSystemPriority:           32768  PartnerOperPort:                      601&lt;BR /&gt;
ActorPortPriority:             32768  PartnerAdminSystemPriority:         32768&lt;BR /&gt;
ActorAdminKey:                    62  PartnerOperSystemPriority:          32768&lt;BR /&gt;
ActorOperKey:                     62  PartnerAdminPortPriority:           32768&lt;BR /&gt;
ActorAdminState:            -----GlA  PartnerOperPortPriority:            32768&lt;BR /&gt;
ActorOperState:             -F----lA  PartnerAdminKey:                      601&lt;BR /&gt;
ActorSystemID:     00-1f-45-d4-0f-5a  PartnerOperKey:                       601&lt;BR /&gt;
SelectedAggID:                  none  PartnerAdminState:               --DCS-lp&lt;BR /&gt;
AttachedAggID:                  none  PartnerOperState:                --DC--lp&lt;BR /&gt;
MuxState:                   Detached  PartnerAdminSystemID:   00-00-00-00-00-00&lt;BR /&gt;
DebugRxState:          port Disabled  PartnerOperSystemID:    00-00-00-00-00-00&lt;BR /&gt;
portStandbyReason:              none&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
VITSCOA1(su)-&amp;gt;show lacp lag.0.62&lt;BR /&gt;
Global Link Aggregation state: enabled &lt;BR /&gt;
Single Port LAGs:              enabled &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Aggregator:  lag.0.62&lt;BR /&gt;
                          Actor                 Partner&lt;BR /&gt;
System Identifier:  00:1f:45:d4:0f:5a      00:11:88:19:0d:79&lt;BR /&gt;
  System Priority:              32768                  32768&lt;BR /&gt;
        Admin Key:                 62&lt;BR /&gt;
         Oper Key:                 62                  32768&lt;BR /&gt;
   Attached Ports:  None.&lt;BR /&gt;
    Standby Ports:  None.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
========================== SUMMIT  X690 ==================&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
* (Software Update Required) Slot-1 VITSC0A3.9 # show ports 3:47-48 no-refresh &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Port Summary&lt;BR /&gt;
Port  Display              VLAN Name           Port  Link  Speed  Duplex&lt;BR /&gt;
#     String               (or # VLANs)        State State Actual Actual&lt;BR /&gt;
========================================================================&lt;BR /&gt;
3:47                       (0028)              E     A     1000   FULL &lt;BR /&gt;
3:48                       (0028)              E     R                              &lt;BR /&gt;
========================================================================&lt;BR /&gt;
   Port State: D-Disabled, E-Enabled, F-Disabled by link-flap detection,&lt;BR /&gt;
               L-Disabled due to licensing&lt;BR /&gt;
   Link State: A-Active, R-Ready, NP-Port not present, L-Loopback,&lt;BR /&gt;
               D-ELSM enabled but not up&lt;BR /&gt;
               d-Ethernet OAM enabled but not up&lt;BR /&gt;
               &lt;BR /&gt;
* (Software Update Required) Slot-1 VITSC0A3.10 # show sharing &lt;BR /&gt;
Load Sharing Monitor&lt;BR /&gt;
Config    Current Agg     Min    Ld Share  Dist  Ld Share  Agg Link  Link Up&lt;BR /&gt;
Master    Master  Control Active Algorithm Flags Group     Mbr State Transitions&lt;BR /&gt;
================================================================================&lt;BR /&gt;
  3:47            LACP       1    L2        A     3:47      -     A       8&lt;BR /&gt;
                                  L2              3:48      -     R       0&lt;BR /&gt;
================================================================================&lt;BR /&gt;
Link State: A-Active, D-Disabled, R-Ready, NP-Port not present, L-Loopback&lt;BR /&gt;
Minimum Active: (&amp;lt;) Group is down. # active links less than configured minimum&lt;BR /&gt;
Load Sharing Algorithm: (L2) Layer 2 address based, (L3) Layer 3 address based&lt;BR /&gt;
                        (L3_L4) Layer 3 address and Layer 4 port based&lt;BR /&gt;
                        (custom) User-selected address-based configuration&lt;BR /&gt;
Custom Algorithm Configuration: ipv4 L3-and-L4, xor&lt;BR /&gt;
Distribution Flags:&lt;BR /&gt;
    A - All: Distribute to all members,&lt;BR /&gt;
    L - Local Slot: Distribute to members local to ingress slot,&lt;BR /&gt;
    P - Port Lists: Distribute to per-slot configurable subset of members,&lt;BR /&gt;
    R - Resilient Hashing enabled.&lt;BR /&gt;
Number of load sharing trunks: 1&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
* (Software Update Required) Slot-1 VITSC0A3.11 # show lacp lag 3:47&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Lag   Actor    Actor  Partner           Partner  Partner Agg   Actor            &lt;BR /&gt;
      Sys-Pri  Key    MAC               Sys-Pri  Key     Count MAC              &lt;BR /&gt;
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;
3:47        0  0x0be7 00:1f:45:d4:0f:5a   32768  0x003e      0 02:04:96:9d:6e:6c&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Port list:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Member     Port      Rx           Sel          Mux            Actor     Partner &lt;BR /&gt;
Port       Priority  State        Logic        State          Flags     Port    &lt;BR /&gt;
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;
3:47       0         Current      Selected     Attached       A-GS----  600      &lt;BR /&gt;
3:48       0         Idle         Unselected   Detached       --------  0        &lt;BR /&gt;
================================================================================&lt;BR /&gt;
Actor Flags: A-Activity, T-Timeout, G-Aggregation, S-Synchronization&lt;BR /&gt;
             C-Collecting, D-Distributing, F-Defaulted, E-Expired&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
========================================&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I just test the summit making a LACP vs a Enterasys C2 and works !!!. Only fail Vs Enterasys N7!!&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 16:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-eos/link-aggregation-summit-x690-vs-enterasys-n-series/m-p/59490#M1611</guid>
      <dc:creator>Elena_Madrigal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-29T16:23:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Link aggregation Summit X690 Vs Enterasys N-Series</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-eos/link-aggregation-summit-x690-vs-enterasys-n-series/m-p/59491#M1612</link>
      <description>Please Help!!!&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 18:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-eos/link-aggregation-summit-x690-vs-enterasys-n-series/m-p/59491#M1612</guid>
      <dc:creator>Elena_Madrigal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-30T18:13:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Link aggregation Summit X690 Vs Enterasys N-Series</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-eos/link-aggregation-summit-x690-vs-enterasys-n-series/m-p/59492#M1613</link>
      <description>If this is urgent, &lt;A href="https://extremeportal.force.com/ExtrArticleDetail?n=000001818" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener"&gt;please contact GTAC directly&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 18:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-eos/link-aggregation-summit-x690-vs-enterasys-n-series/m-p/59492#M1613</guid>
      <dc:creator>Drew_C</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-30T18:13:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Link aggregation Summit X690 Vs Enterasys N-Series</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-eos/link-aggregation-summit-x690-vs-enterasys-n-series/m-p/59493#M1614</link>
      <description>Hi Elena,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
it is interesting that the configuration works with a C2 (tested by you) and an S-Series (tested by me, with an X460-G2), but not with the N7.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The &lt;I&gt;show port lacp port ge.3.24-25 status detail&lt;/I&gt; output contains unexpected results, but I cannot interpret them completely. The N7 seems to report LACP communication with the X690, but seems to wrongly interpret this as if the links are not supposed to be active, perhaps because it does not see or accept the system ID of the X690 (&lt;I&gt;DebugRxState: Defaulted  &lt;B&gt;PartnerOperSystemID: 00-00-00-00-00-00&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/I&gt;).&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Please note that the X690 asks for a software upgrade (* &lt;B&gt;(Software Update Required)&lt;/B&gt; Slot-1 VITSC0A3.9 . Please consider upgrading the X690 to the latest patch level of the recommended EXOS release.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I concur with Drew that you should consider opening a GTAC case.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;
Erik</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2017 15:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-eos/link-aggregation-summit-x690-vs-enterasys-n-series/m-p/59493#M1614</guid>
      <dc:creator>Erik_Auerswald</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-01T15:30:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Link aggregation Summit X690 Vs Enterasys N-Series</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-eos/link-aggregation-summit-x690-vs-enterasys-n-series/m-p/59494#M1615</link>
      <description>Hi Elena,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I have just tested the LAG configuration with an X460-G2 with EXOS 22.2.1.5-patch1-5 and an N1 with firmware 07.63.01.0006, and it works fine.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I currently suspect the non-production-ready X690 firmware to not set the LACP System ID and the N7 to not accept the all zero LACP System ID it sees. You could try to verify this by attaching a packet sniffer (e.g. a PC with &lt;A href="https://www.wireshark.org/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener"&gt;Wireshark&lt;/A&gt;) to the X690 (or a mirror port on a switch connected to the X690, see &lt;A href="https://gtacknowledge.extremenetworks.com/articles/How_To/How-To-Configure-a-Port-Mirror-on-an-Enterasys-Modular-Switch/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener"&gt;How To Configure a Port Mirror on an EOS Modular Switch&lt;/A&gt; or &lt;A href="https://gtacknowledge.extremenetworks.com/articles/How_To/How-To-Enable-And-Configure-Mirroring-In-EXOS/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener"&gt;How To Enable And Configure Mirroring In EXOS&lt;/A&gt;) and looking at the captured LACP PDUs.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
A software update on the X690 and a new test with the configuration that works with a C2 with the N7 is probably easier and might actually solve the problem.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
BTW, does the output of the command &lt;I&gt;show port lacp port  status detail&lt;/I&gt; on the C2 show an &lt;U&gt;all zero operational LACP System ID&lt;/U&gt; as well?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;
Erik</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2017 23:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-eos/link-aggregation-summit-x690-vs-enterasys-n-series/m-p/59494#M1615</guid>
      <dc:creator>Erik_Auerswald</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-01T23:10:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Link aggregation Summit X690 Vs Enterasys N-Series</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-eos/link-aggregation-summit-x690-vs-enterasys-n-series/m-p/59495#M1616</link>
      <description>Thanks erik, we found the issue and &lt;B&gt;the problem is solved now&lt;/B&gt;, making the LAG as a static in the enterasys N7 works fine!!. Dinamic not work. Only work with a static config.&lt;BR /&gt;
However with C2 works as dinamic and static config. I dont know the reason.&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks all people for the support.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2017 00:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-eos/link-aggregation-summit-x690-vs-enterasys-n-series/m-p/59495#M1616</guid>
      <dc:creator>Elena_Madrigal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-02T00:33:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Link aggregation Summit X690 Vs Enterasys N-Series</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-eos/link-aggregation-summit-x690-vs-enterasys-n-series/m-p/59496#M1617</link>
      <description>Hello Elena,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
it is great to read that the problem is solved by using a static LAG as workaround. Thanks for letting us know!&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Please consider that a static LAG configuration can be dangerous, since any cabling changes regarding one of the switches participation in the static LAG may result in cabling errors that might result in a loop. Dynamic LAGs using LACP prevent a loop from forming by not activating the wrongly cabled links. Thus I always recommend to use LACP for LAGs.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;
Erik</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2017 02:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-eos/link-aggregation-summit-x690-vs-enterasys-n-series/m-p/59496#M1617</guid>
      <dc:creator>Erik_Auerswald</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-02T02:20:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

