<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: link state tracking or similar technology in ExtremeSwitching (EOS)</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-eos/link-state-tracking-or-similar-technology/m-p/64742#M2060</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I’m running DC-440 switch stack on one side and DC-440G2 stack on the other.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2019 02:23:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>treese</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-12-21T02:23:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>link state tracking or similar technology</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-eos/link-state-tracking-or-similar-technology/m-p/64740#M2058</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a remote site with multiple fiber circuits&amp;nbsp; connected.&amp;nbsp; They all take the same VLAN but I’m unable to aggregate the circuits because the port speed differ at each end.&amp;nbsp; Is there a way I could use link-state tracking or similar technology if a one of the circuits becomes unusable to auto disable it and enable one of the others?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2019 22:32:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-eos/link-state-tracking-or-similar-technology/m-p/64740#M2058</guid>
      <dc:creator>treese</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-20T22:32:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: link state tracking or similar technology</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-eos/link-state-tracking-or-similar-technology/m-p/64741#M2059</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Ted, is there a particular product model you’re using? The answer depends on which platform you’ve got.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2019 02:21:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-eos/link-state-tracking-or-similar-technology/m-p/64741#M2059</guid>
      <dc:creator>Drew_C</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-21T02:21:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: link state tracking or similar technology</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-eos/link-state-tracking-or-similar-technology/m-p/64742#M2060</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I’m running DC-440 switch stack on one side and DC-440G2 stack on the other.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2019 02:23:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-eos/link-state-tracking-or-similar-technology/m-p/64742#M2060</guid>
      <dc:creator>treese</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-21T02:23:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

