<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ERS 4826 GTS-PWR+ | Agent Code Checksum Failed in ExtremeSwitching (ERS)</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-ers/ers-4826-gts-pwr-agent-code-checksum-failed/m-p/27374#M10</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;One of our customers had their legacy stack’s base unit fail, and I replaced the failed unit with a spare one that they had on site.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The “base” switch at the back is on, and the stacking cables in the rear are as they were on the failed unit.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I powered the new switch on, and for a moment the auto-unit-replacement system seemed to have worked, until the replacement unit’s first reboot.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After that the replacement unit is stuck on the following message:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ethernet Routing Switch 4826GTS-PWR+&lt;BR /&gt;Reading MAC Address...&lt;BR /&gt;MAC Address: &amp;lt;censored&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Resets: &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; 2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dip Switch in Base Unit position&lt;BR /&gt;RAM &amp;nbsp; size: &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;1GB&lt;BR /&gt;FLASH size: &amp;nbsp; 64MB&lt;BR /&gt;Super ISO is present&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Attaching SOC unit 0... PCI device ASIC attached as unit 0&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Diagnostics &amp;nbsp; 5.6.0.18 &amp;nbsp; Mar 02 2012, 10:27:37&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Test 106 &amp;nbsp;USB &amp;nbsp; Register Test &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; - PASSED&lt;BR /&gt;Test 111 &amp;nbsp;DDRAM Walking 1/0s &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;- PASSED&lt;BR /&gt;Test 112 &amp;nbsp;DDRAM Byte/Word/Long &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;- PASSED&lt;BR /&gt;Test 113 &amp;nbsp;DDRAM Power-of-2 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;- PASSED&lt;BR /&gt;Test 121 &amp;nbsp;ROM &amp;nbsp; Config &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;- PASSED&lt;BR /&gt;Test 151 &amp;nbsp;FANs &amp;nbsp;Status &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;- PASSED&lt;BR /&gt;Test 207 &amp;nbsp;XGS &amp;nbsp; SWITCH Registers &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;- PASSED&lt;BR /&gt;Test 221 &amp;nbsp;PHYs &amp;nbsp;Register &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;- PASSED&lt;BR /&gt;Test 271 &amp;nbsp;Ports Internal Loopback &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; - PASSED&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;## Agent Code Checksum Failed&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Press 'a' &amp;nbsp;to run Agent code&lt;BR /&gt;Press 'd' &amp;nbsp;to download agent/diag/bootloader code&lt;BR /&gt;Press 'e' &amp;nbsp;to display Errors&lt;BR /&gt;Press 'i' &amp;nbsp;to initialize config flash&lt;BR /&gt;Press 'p' &amp;nbsp;to run POST tests&lt;BR /&gt;Press 'r' &amp;nbsp;to reset the box…&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;And so I’ve narrowed it down to the SW version mismatch.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The remaining 2 out of 3 units in stack are now on:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;#show boot image&lt;BR /&gt;Unit &amp;nbsp;Agent Image Active Image&lt;BR /&gt;----- ----------- ------------&lt;BR /&gt;2 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; 5.12.1.027 &amp;nbsp;5.12.1.027 &amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;3 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; 5.12.1.027 &amp;nbsp;5.12.1.027 &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The replacement unit was still running an ancient&amp;nbsp;5.6.0.18;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So my further search online revealed &lt;A href="https://extreme.connectedcommunity.org/communities/community-home/digestviewer/view-question?ContributedContentKey=59a6cc13-9762-4e6d-bda7-5cbf855d1dba&amp;amp;CommunityKey=efaccd87-cd58-4b48-8fdc-6c1c39b7c3db&amp;amp;tab=digestviewer" target="_self" rel="noreferrer"&gt;this&lt;/A&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So my question was, could&amp;nbsp;I still remedy the situation, or did I write off a perfectly good switch by having the stack push the new SW version on it? Because from what I understood, the upgrade path for 4826 didn’t allow upgrading directly from 5.6.x.x to 5.12.x.x and required&amp;nbsp;several steps in-between.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As this was a legit purchase from Avaya, the customer still have access to the original legacy SW versions in their internal DB, back from the day this so;lution was implemented.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I did find an agent version of&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;FW:5.6.0.18, copied it to the USB, inserted the USB to the switch and on the “Agent Code Checksum Failed” prompt above, pressed “d” to download and implement the .img;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Worked like a charm.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This was originally a question, but then while I was typing it, the image was being downloaded. It then booted the switch back to its original - factory default state, and instead of just deleting it, I though it may help someone in the future.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I understand I may be totally off, as the ERS4800 series is a dinosaur.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2021 15:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>poddy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-06-02T15:15:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ERS 4826 GTS-PWR+ | Agent Code Checksum Failed</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-ers/ers-4826-gts-pwr-agent-code-checksum-failed/m-p/27374#M10</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;One of our customers had their legacy stack’s base unit fail, and I replaced the failed unit with a spare one that they had on site.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The “base” switch at the back is on, and the stacking cables in the rear are as they were on the failed unit.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I powered the new switch on, and for a moment the auto-unit-replacement system seemed to have worked, until the replacement unit’s first reboot.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After that the replacement unit is stuck on the following message:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ethernet Routing Switch 4826GTS-PWR+&lt;BR /&gt;Reading MAC Address...&lt;BR /&gt;MAC Address: &amp;lt;censored&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Resets: &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; 2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dip Switch in Base Unit position&lt;BR /&gt;RAM &amp;nbsp; size: &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;1GB&lt;BR /&gt;FLASH size: &amp;nbsp; 64MB&lt;BR /&gt;Super ISO is present&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Attaching SOC unit 0... PCI device ASIC attached as unit 0&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Diagnostics &amp;nbsp; 5.6.0.18 &amp;nbsp; Mar 02 2012, 10:27:37&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Test 106 &amp;nbsp;USB &amp;nbsp; Register Test &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; - PASSED&lt;BR /&gt;Test 111 &amp;nbsp;DDRAM Walking 1/0s &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;- PASSED&lt;BR /&gt;Test 112 &amp;nbsp;DDRAM Byte/Word/Long &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;- PASSED&lt;BR /&gt;Test 113 &amp;nbsp;DDRAM Power-of-2 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;- PASSED&lt;BR /&gt;Test 121 &amp;nbsp;ROM &amp;nbsp; Config &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;- PASSED&lt;BR /&gt;Test 151 &amp;nbsp;FANs &amp;nbsp;Status &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;- PASSED&lt;BR /&gt;Test 207 &amp;nbsp;XGS &amp;nbsp; SWITCH Registers &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;- PASSED&lt;BR /&gt;Test 221 &amp;nbsp;PHYs &amp;nbsp;Register &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;- PASSED&lt;BR /&gt;Test 271 &amp;nbsp;Ports Internal Loopback &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; - PASSED&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;## Agent Code Checksum Failed&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Press 'a' &amp;nbsp;to run Agent code&lt;BR /&gt;Press 'd' &amp;nbsp;to download agent/diag/bootloader code&lt;BR /&gt;Press 'e' &amp;nbsp;to display Errors&lt;BR /&gt;Press 'i' &amp;nbsp;to initialize config flash&lt;BR /&gt;Press 'p' &amp;nbsp;to run POST tests&lt;BR /&gt;Press 'r' &amp;nbsp;to reset the box…&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;And so I’ve narrowed it down to the SW version mismatch.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The remaining 2 out of 3 units in stack are now on:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;#show boot image&lt;BR /&gt;Unit &amp;nbsp;Agent Image Active Image&lt;BR /&gt;----- ----------- ------------&lt;BR /&gt;2 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; 5.12.1.027 &amp;nbsp;5.12.1.027 &amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;3 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; 5.12.1.027 &amp;nbsp;5.12.1.027 &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The replacement unit was still running an ancient&amp;nbsp;5.6.0.18;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So my further search online revealed &lt;A href="https://extreme.connectedcommunity.org/communities/community-home/digestviewer/view-question?ContributedContentKey=59a6cc13-9762-4e6d-bda7-5cbf855d1dba&amp;amp;CommunityKey=efaccd87-cd58-4b48-8fdc-6c1c39b7c3db&amp;amp;tab=digestviewer" target="_self" rel="noreferrer"&gt;this&lt;/A&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So my question was, could&amp;nbsp;I still remedy the situation, or did I write off a perfectly good switch by having the stack push the new SW version on it? Because from what I understood, the upgrade path for 4826 didn’t allow upgrading directly from 5.6.x.x to 5.12.x.x and required&amp;nbsp;several steps in-between.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As this was a legit purchase from Avaya, the customer still have access to the original legacy SW versions in their internal DB, back from the day this so;lution was implemented.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I did find an agent version of&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;FW:5.6.0.18, copied it to the USB, inserted the USB to the switch and on the “Agent Code Checksum Failed” prompt above, pressed “d” to download and implement the .img;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Worked like a charm.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This was originally a question, but then while I was typing it, the image was being downloaded. It then booted the switch back to its original - factory default state, and instead of just deleting it, I though it may help someone in the future.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I understand I may be totally off, as the ERS4800 series is a dinosaur.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2021 15:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-ers/ers-4826-gts-pwr-agent-code-checksum-failed/m-p/27374#M10</guid>
      <dc:creator>poddy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-02T15:15:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: ERS 4826 GTS-PWR+ | Agent Code Checksum Failed</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-ers/ers-4826-gts-pwr-agent-code-checksum-failed/m-p/27375#M11</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Good Info. Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2021 08:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-ers/ers-4826-gts-pwr-agent-code-checksum-failed/m-p/27375#M11</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dilraj_Singh_Kh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-20T08:01:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

