<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic RE: LOST FRAME SIZE 64 - 350 in ExtremeSwitching (EXOS/Switch Engine)</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/lost-frame-size-64-350/m-p/53812#M15219</link>
    <description>Hello E Fierros,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Can you please elaborate on the test and the process you went through to fail over EAPS?</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2017 00:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Patrick_Voss</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-06-16T00:29:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>LOST FRAME SIZE 64 - 350</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/lost-frame-size-64-350/m-p/53811#M15218</link>
      <description>I have a domain eaps , and i did a test for a frame size 64 bytes , for the primary port the test is sucefull but when did a fail over at  the secondary port  test no pass.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I have configure jumbo frame , can you share the possibilities for this scenery ?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2017 00:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/lost-frame-size-64-350/m-p/53811#M15218</guid>
      <dc:creator>E_FIERROS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-16T00:17:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: LOST FRAME SIZE 64 - 350</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/lost-frame-size-64-350/m-p/53812#M15219</link>
      <description>Hello E Fierros,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Can you please elaborate on the test and the process you went through to fail over EAPS?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2017 00:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/lost-frame-size-64-350/m-p/53812#M15219</guid>
      <dc:creator>Patrick_Voss</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-16T00:29:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: LOST FRAME SIZE 64 - 350</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/lost-frame-size-64-350/m-p/53813#M15220</link>
      <description>Yes ,  i have the fallowing configuration  &lt;BR /&gt;
* a1-jade-ps-mx.1 # show eaps "eaps-perisur"&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
  Name: eaps-perisur                            Priority: Normal&lt;BR /&gt;
  State: Complete                               Running: Yes&lt;BR /&gt;
  Enabled: Yes    Mode: Master&lt;BR /&gt;
  Primary port:   28            Port status: Up Tag status: Tagged&lt;BR /&gt;
  Secondary port: 26            Port status: Blocked    Tag status: Tagged&lt;BR /&gt;
  Hello Egress Port: Primary&lt;BR /&gt;
  Hello timer interval: 10 sec  0  millisec&lt;BR /&gt;
  Fail timer interval:  30 sec  0  millisec&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
26     d1-ppps-ps-mx             00:00:00:04:96:35:d3:99   1:48   19     14&lt;BR /&gt;
28     d2-ppps-ps-mx             00:00:00:04:96:35:d3:4c   1:47   14     14&lt;BR /&gt;
=============================================================================&lt;BR /&gt;
* a1-jade-ps-mx.3 #&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;
* d1-ppps-ps-mx.1 # show  eaps "eaps-perisur"&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
  Name: eaps-perisur                            Priority: Normal&lt;BR /&gt;
  State: Links-Up                               Running: Yes&lt;BR /&gt;
  Enabled: Yes    Mode: Transit&lt;BR /&gt;
  Primary port:   49            Port status: Up Tag status: Tagged&lt;BR /&gt;
  Secondary port: 48            Port status: Up Tag status: Tagged&lt;BR /&gt;
  Hello timer interval: 10 sec  0  millisec&lt;BR /&gt;
  Fail timer interval:  30 sec  0  millisec&lt;BR /&gt;
  Preforwarding Timer interval: 15 sec&lt;BR /&gt;
  Last update: From Master Id 00:04:96:97:dd:c6, at Thu Jun 15 15:24:14 2017&lt;BR /&gt;
48     a1-jade-ps-mx             00:00:00:04:96:97:dd:c6   1:26   56     14&lt;BR /&gt;
49     d2-ppps-ps-mx             00:00:00:04:96:35:d3:4c   1:49   8      218&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;
d2-ppps-ps-mx.1 # show  eaps "eaps-perisur"&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
  Name: eaps-perisur                            Priority: Normal&lt;BR /&gt;
  State: Links-Up                               Running: Yes&lt;BR /&gt;
  Enabled: Yes    Mode: Transit&lt;BR /&gt;
  Primary port:   47            Port status: Up Tag status: Tagged&lt;BR /&gt;
  Secondary port: 49            Port status: Up Tag status: Tagged&lt;BR /&gt;
  Hello timer interval: 10 sec  0  millisec&lt;BR /&gt;
  Fail timer interval:  30 sec  0  millisec&lt;BR /&gt;
  Preforwarding Timer interval: 15 sec&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The situation is when change the path for the secondary port (fail over) the test that ran fail. Exactly with frames 64 bytes - 350 bytes &lt;P class="fancybox-image"&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="1488d5a7c5e8469b99c4899d6f930209_RackMultipart20170615-130227-68nwat-Eaps_Configuration_inline.png"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/4608i2D40AA012115FA30/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="1488d5a7c5e8469b99c4899d6f930209_RackMultipart20170615-130227-68nwat-Eaps_Configuration_inline.png" alt="1488d5a7c5e8469b99c4899d6f930209_RackMultipart20170615-130227-68nwat-Eaps_Configuration_inline.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I saw a congestion over the neighbors port but for the route primary (a1-jade - d2-ppps-d1-ppps) is the same behavior and the test dont have errors (frames loss) &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2017 01:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/lost-frame-size-64-350/m-p/53813#M15220</guid>
      <dc:creator>E_FIERROS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-16T01:29:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: LOST FRAME SIZE 64 - 350</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/lost-frame-size-64-350/m-p/53814#M15221</link>
      <description>This is the capture of errors &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P class="fancybox-image"&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="57ac98417918433f9f90cab6ab688065_RackMultipart20170615-4680-p9094f-Frame_loss_inline.png"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/1901i6EB5988299D2AB54/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="57ac98417918433f9f90cab6ab688065_RackMultipart20170615-4680-p9094f-Frame_loss_inline.png" alt="57ac98417918433f9f90cab6ab688065_RackMultipart20170615-4680-p9094f-Frame_loss_inline.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2017 01:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/lost-frame-size-64-350/m-p/53814#M15221</guid>
      <dc:creator>E_FIERROS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-16T01:31:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: LOST FRAME SIZE 64 - 350</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/lost-frame-size-64-350/m-p/53815#M15222</link>
      <description>Did the redundant path take over and your test stopped dropping frames?  There is always some packet loss when you have a link failure and there will be some packet loss when you restore.  I am assuming that this is what you are seeing is a pass or fail from a test set based purly on packet loss and not how long it takes the network to restore when you do the fail over.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2017 02:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/lost-frame-size-64-350/m-p/53815#M15222</guid>
      <dc:creator>EtherMAN</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-16T02:50:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: LOST FRAME SIZE 64 - 350</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/lost-frame-size-64-350/m-p/53816#M15223</link>
      <description>Hi Ethernet Man , Thanks for the information  and know maybe exist the posibility  drop paquets when did a fail over. But the situation is that I make or ran a test RFC2544 because I am checking the 2 path ( primary and secondary) like attached topology nothing change on the path only when did a change over the eaps-´perisur.  For one side the test is exitoso (primary) but for the second path is not working fine and appears lost frames&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2017 17:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/lost-frame-size-64-350/m-p/53816#M15223</guid>
      <dc:creator>E_FIERROS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-16T17:08:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: LOST FRAME SIZE 64 - 350</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/lost-frame-size-64-350/m-p/53817#M15224</link>
      <description>So with a 3 point ring where are you placing your test set and where is the loopback for your testing ?   This would help you narrow down a problem with one of the links.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2017 18:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/lost-frame-size-64-350/m-p/53817#M15224</guid>
      <dc:creator>EtherMAN</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-16T18:50:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: LOST FRAME SIZE 64 - 350</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/lost-frame-size-64-350/m-p/53818#M15225</link>
      <description>Ok the equipment that function like a loopback is connected on port 1 equipment a1-jade and the emisor equipment is connected in another ring .&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2017 22:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/lost-frame-size-64-350/m-p/53818#M15225</guid>
      <dc:creator>E_FIERROS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-16T22:31:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

