<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic RE: eigrp in ExtremeSwitching (EXOS/Switch Engine)</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/eigrp/m-p/21744#M1620</link>
    <description>Hi all,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
a basic EIGRP version (without stub and summaries) is published as the informational &lt;A href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7868" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener"&gt;RFC 7868&lt;/A&gt;. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
This is not in the standards track, thus EIGRP is still proprietary. Cisco provides an &lt;A href="http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/ios-nx-os-software/enhanced-interior-gateway-routing-protocol-eigrp/qa_C67-726299.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener"&gt;FAQ&lt;/A&gt; regarding this.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Of course the stub and summary features, missing from the RFC, are required to scale EIGRP networks, so it is not really clear if there are practical reasons for implementing the RFC.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;
Erik</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 19:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Erik_Auerswald</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-04-12T19:33:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>eigrp</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/eigrp/m-p/21741#M1617</link>
      <description>Hello, all!&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Can't find any information about support EIGRP by EXOS.&lt;BR /&gt;
Can you tell me some more information?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thank you!</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 14:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/eigrp/m-p/21741#M1617</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alexandr_P</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-12T14:11:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: eigrp</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/eigrp/m-p/21742#M1618</link>
      <description>EIGRP is a cisco proprietary routing protocol. EXOS does not support EIGRP.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 14:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/eigrp/m-p/21742#M1618</guid>
      <dc:creator>OscarK</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-12T14:13:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: eigrp</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/eigrp/m-p/21743#M1619</link>
      <description>Thank you, Oscar!</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 15:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/eigrp/m-p/21743#M1619</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alexandr_P</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-12T15:22:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: eigrp</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/eigrp/m-p/21744#M1620</link>
      <description>Hi all,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
a basic EIGRP version (without stub and summaries) is published as the informational &lt;A href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7868" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener"&gt;RFC 7868&lt;/A&gt;. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
This is not in the standards track, thus EIGRP is still proprietary. Cisco provides an &lt;A href="http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/ios-nx-os-software/enhanced-interior-gateway-routing-protocol-eigrp/qa_C67-726299.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener"&gt;FAQ&lt;/A&gt; regarding this.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Of course the stub and summary features, missing from the RFC, are required to scale EIGRP networks, so it is not really clear if there are practical reasons for implementing the RFC.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;
Erik</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 19:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/eigrp/m-p/21744#M1620</guid>
      <dc:creator>Erik_Auerswald</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-12T19:33:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

