<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Stateful ACL in EXOS (and other OSs) in ExtremeSwitching (EXOS/Switch Engine)</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/stateful-acl-in-exos-and-other-oss/m-p/56120#M16332</link>
    <description>Are there any plans to implement stateful ACLs in the switch OS?  I think the benefits would be astounding.  Of course I'm not sure of the cost.  &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Control/Policy seems to be stateful, and wireless (identifi) policy also seems to be stateful.  Why not EXOS?</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2018 20:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Terren_Crider</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-08-20T20:57:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Stateful ACL in EXOS (and other OSs)</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/stateful-acl-in-exos-and-other-oss/m-p/56120#M16332</link>
      <description>Are there any plans to implement stateful ACLs in the switch OS?  I think the benefits would be astounding.  Of course I'm not sure of the cost.  &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Control/Policy seems to be stateful, and wireless (identifi) policy also seems to be stateful.  Why not EXOS?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2018 20:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/stateful-acl-in-exos-and-other-oss/m-p/56120#M16332</guid>
      <dc:creator>Terren_Crider</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-20T20:57:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

