<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic RE: Eaps design in ExtremeSwitching (EXOS/Switch Engine)</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/eaps-design/m-p/57748#M17135</link>
    <description>We try to keep ours to ten or less for reason number one... Our core which is 12 switches is the exception because several of the nodes are a pair of 8900's setting side by side... At 80 to 90 k mac tables with about 2500 active tag ids on 25 or 30 EAPS rings in the core we still get sub 150ms fail over... flaps hurt though&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 03:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>EtherMAN</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-09-01T03:10:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Eaps design</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/eaps-design/m-p/57746#M17133</link>
      <description>Hi&lt;BR /&gt;
In your opinion, how many nodes can I use in single domain, about 20 still will be ok? I knoiw that in theory eaps doesn't have limnitations.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Regards</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 14:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/eaps-design/m-p/57746#M17133</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pawel_Zwierzyns</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-30T14:18:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Eaps design</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/eaps-design/m-p/57747#M17134</link>
      <description>Pawel, EAPS does not impose a limitation in the number of nodes in a ring, but there are two factors that you should bear in mind:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;OL&gt; 
&lt;LI&gt;EAPS, being a ring topology, will survive to ONE failure. If a second failure occurs, you will lose connectivity. The larger the number of nodes (and links), the higher the probability of having two or more failures. 
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;When a failure is detected (or cleared) the Master switch will send a "Flush-FDB" message through the control vlan. When a Transit node receives this message it flushes its MAC table to relearn the new topology, and retransmits the message to the next switch in the ring. If you have a lot of switches in the ring, the time it takes for the ring to re-converge (that is, the time it takes for all the switches to flush their FDB and re-learn the topology) grows.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;For me, the first factor is the most important, but the second should be considered if you need really fast convergence times.&lt;BR /&gt;
  &lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 00:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/eaps-design/m-p/57747#M17134</guid>
      <dc:creator>dflouret</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-31T00:14:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Eaps design</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/eaps-design/m-p/57748#M17135</link>
      <description>We try to keep ours to ten or less for reason number one... Our core which is 12 switches is the exception because several of the nodes are a pair of 8900's setting side by side... At 80 to 90 k mac tables with about 2500 active tag ids on 25 or 30 EAPS rings in the core we still get sub 150ms fail over... flaps hurt though&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 03:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/eaps-design/m-p/57748#M17135</guid>
      <dc:creator>EtherMAN</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-01T03:10:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Eaps design</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/eaps-design/m-p/57749#M17136</link>
      <description>Hi Pawel,&lt;BR /&gt;
Here is one interesting discussing about EAPS design.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="https://community.extremenetworks.com/extreme/topics/need-some-help-witch-eaps-rings-design" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener"&gt;https://community.extremenetworks.com/extreme/topics/need-some-help-witch-eaps-rings-design&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Best regards,&lt;BR /&gt;
Bin&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 16:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/eaps-design/m-p/57749#M17136</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-04T16:36:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

