<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Jumbo frames configured though dell devices will not respond to a mtu size set for more than 8976 in ExtremeSwitching (EXOS/Switch Engine)</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/jumbo-frames-configured-though-dell-devices-will-not-respond-to/m-p/58027#M17193</link>
    <description>Jumbo fames enabled for L2 and L3.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If I ping between two extreme switches with an MTU of 9000 , I get an appropriate response, basically it works as expected.&lt;BR /&gt;
ping vr  "VR-Default" start-size 9000 10.2.7.1&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
    Ping(ICMP)  10.2.7.1: 4 packets, 9000 data bytes, interval 1 second(s).&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
    9008  bytes from 10.2.7.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=7.777 ms&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
    9008  bytes from 10.2.7.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=3.028 ms&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
    9008  bytes from 10.2.7.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=1.771 ms&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
    &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
9008  bytes from 10.2.7.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=2.984 ms&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If I ping from the switch to a dell server , the max mtu size I can achieve is :&lt;BR /&gt;
# ping  vr "VR-CS-SERVER" start-size 8976 10.2.6.5&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
    Ping(ICMP)  10.2.6.5: 4 packets, 8976 data bytes, interval 1 second(s).&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
    8984  bytes from 10.2.6.5: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.487 ms&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
    8984  bytes from 10.2.6.5: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.470 ms&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
    8984  bytes from 10.2.6.5: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=2.732 ms&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
    8984  bytes from 10.2.6.5: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=2.656 ms&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
     FAILS AT :&lt;BR /&gt;
ping vr "VR-CS-SERVER" start-size 8977 10.2.6.5&lt;BR /&gt;
Ping(ICMP) 10.2.6.5: 4 packets, 8977 data bytes, interval 1 second(s).&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
--- 10.2.6.5 ping statistics ---&lt;BR /&gt;
4 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% loss&lt;BR /&gt;
round-trip min/avg/max = 0/0/0 ms&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
IS this a limitation on Jumbo frames ?&lt;BR /&gt;
Am I missing some overhead that is added to teh ping ?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Any help would be appreciated &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rod_Robertson2</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-09-01T14:30:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Jumbo frames configured though dell devices will not respond to a mtu size set for more than 8976</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/jumbo-frames-configured-though-dell-devices-will-not-respond-to/m-p/58027#M17193</link>
      <description>Jumbo fames enabled for L2 and L3.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If I ping between two extreme switches with an MTU of 9000 , I get an appropriate response, basically it works as expected.&lt;BR /&gt;
ping vr  "VR-Default" start-size 9000 10.2.7.1&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
    Ping(ICMP)  10.2.7.1: 4 packets, 9000 data bytes, interval 1 second(s).&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
    9008  bytes from 10.2.7.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=7.777 ms&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
    9008  bytes from 10.2.7.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=3.028 ms&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
    9008  bytes from 10.2.7.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=1.771 ms&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
    &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
9008  bytes from 10.2.7.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=2.984 ms&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If I ping from the switch to a dell server , the max mtu size I can achieve is :&lt;BR /&gt;
# ping  vr "VR-CS-SERVER" start-size 8976 10.2.6.5&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
    Ping(ICMP)  10.2.6.5: 4 packets, 8976 data bytes, interval 1 second(s).&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
    8984  bytes from 10.2.6.5: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.487 ms&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
    8984  bytes from 10.2.6.5: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.470 ms&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
    8984  bytes from 10.2.6.5: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=2.732 ms&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
    8984  bytes from 10.2.6.5: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=2.656 ms&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
     FAILS AT :&lt;BR /&gt;
ping vr "VR-CS-SERVER" start-size 8977 10.2.6.5&lt;BR /&gt;
Ping(ICMP) 10.2.6.5: 4 packets, 8977 data bytes, interval 1 second(s).&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
--- 10.2.6.5 ping statistics ---&lt;BR /&gt;
4 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% loss&lt;BR /&gt;
round-trip min/avg/max = 0/0/0 ms&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
IS this a limitation on Jumbo frames ?&lt;BR /&gt;
Am I missing some overhead that is added to teh ping ?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Any help would be appreciated &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/jumbo-frames-configured-though-dell-devices-will-not-respond-to/m-p/58027#M17193</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rod_Robertson2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-01T14:30:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Jumbo frames configured though dell devices will not respond to a mtu size set for more than 8976</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/jumbo-frames-configured-though-dell-devices-will-not-respond-to/m-p/58028#M17194</link>
      <description>Hi Rod,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Have you checked the MTU size of the Dell server port?&lt;BR /&gt;
It looks like the Dell server can support up to 8976 MTU size or it is configured with 8976 MTU size, so it can't reply with 8977 packet size as it exceeds the maximum size.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 14:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/jumbo-frames-configured-though-dell-devices-will-not-respond-to/m-p/58028#M17194</guid>
      <dc:creator>David_Choi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-01T14:51:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Jumbo frames configured though dell devices will not respond to a mtu size set for more than 8976</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/jumbo-frames-configured-though-dell-devices-will-not-respond-to/m-p/58029#M17195</link>
      <description>&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
From the customer :&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I  have change the storage device (10.2.6.6) to 9000 and when we ping –s9000 from  the server (10.2.6.8) to the storage it does fail thus:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
     &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
    #  vmkping -d -I vmk1 -s 9000 10.2.6.6&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
    PING  10.2.6.6 (10.2.6.6): 9000 data bytes&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
    sendto()  failed (Message too long)&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
    sendto()  failed (Message too long)&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
    sendto()  failed (Message too long)&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
     &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
    However  there might be a simple explanation for this.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
     &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
    This  link &lt;A href="http://rickardnobel.se/troubleshoot-jumbo-frames-with-vmkping/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener"&gt;http://rickardnobel.se/troubleshoot-jumbo-frames-with-vmkping/&lt;/A&gt;  provides the answers. Basically when we do a ping test we should do a test with  –s 8972 to allow for the overheads in the  ping command itself.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
     &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
    So  this works a treat:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
    #  vmkping -d -I vmk1 -s 8972 10.2.6.6&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
    PING  10.2.6.6 (10.2.6.6): 8972 data bytes&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
    8980  bytes from 10.2.6.6: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.151 ms&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
    8980  bytes from 10.2.6.6: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.133 ms&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
    8980  bytes from 10.2.6.6: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.135 ms&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
This seems to have working in this scenario &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Something to lookout for in the future.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 16:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/jumbo-frames-configured-though-dell-devices-will-not-respond-to/m-p/58029#M17195</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rod_Robertson2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-01T16:40:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

