<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic RE: EXOS SNMP filter in ExtremeSwitching (EXOS/Switch Engine)</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/exos-snmp-filter/m-p/22117#M1768</link>
    <description>I tried librenms but it's the same poller mechanism as observium uses it.</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2016 19:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-01-12T19:15:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>EXOS SNMP filter</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/exos-snmp-filter/m-p/22111#M1762</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;
is it possible to filter snmp message from EXOS?&lt;BR /&gt;
I want to do a snmpbulkwalk to a switch with more than 800 VLAN's. The snmpbulkwalk need more than 5 minutes. This is fatal for my rrd graphs. &lt;BR /&gt;
Can I dismiss all VLANs (IF-MIB::ifDescr.1000001 ... &amp;gt;1000000) so that the bulkwalk doesn't get this informations?</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2016 18:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/exos-snmp-filter/m-p/22111#M1762</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-12T18:13:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: EXOS SNMP filter</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/exos-snmp-filter/m-p/22112#M1763</link>
      <description>I'm not sure if you can teach EXOS to limit SNMP replies, but have you considered playing with "-Cn" and "-Cr" in snmpbulkwalk /snmpbulkget ? (See &lt;A href="http://www.uow.edu.au/~blane/netapp/ontap/nag/networking/concept/c_oc_netw_snmp_command_examples.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener"&gt;http://www.uow.edu.au/~blane/netapp/ontap/nag/networking/concept/c_oc_netw_snmp_command_examples.htm...&lt;/A&gt; in addition to the man-page)&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Also, if you're using Cacti for your graphs, I presume you've already switched to "spine" as your poller?&lt;BR /&gt;
And here's a "limit OIDs / tune cacti" page that I should probably implement to some extent as well: &lt;A href="http://realworldnumbers.com/cacti-tuning-how-to-set-maximum-oids-per-get-request/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener"&gt;http://realworldnumbers.com/cacti-tuning-how-to-set-maximum-oids-per-get-request/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
HTH,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
     Frank&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2016 18:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/exos-snmp-filter/m-p/22112#M1763</guid>
      <dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-12T18:40:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: EXOS SNMP filter</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/exos-snmp-filter/m-p/22113#M1764</link>
      <description>Thanks for your fast feedback. I want to use observium and still tried the -Cr option. But the snmp request dies after some seconds with following message:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Error in packet.Reason: (tooBig) Response message would have been too large.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2016 19:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/exos-snmp-filter/m-p/22113#M1764</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-12T19:15:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: EXOS SNMP filter</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/exos-snmp-filter/m-p/22114#M1765</link>
      <description>Ah, Observium  I've played with that as well - and yes, it seems to  want to query *EVERYTHING* on the devices, and I have noticed it takes a  while on its queries. I may have to revisit that, but that might take  me a bit, as I'm not using it actively in production.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2016 19:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/exos-snmp-filter/m-p/22114#M1765</guid>
      <dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-12T19:15:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: EXOS SNMP filter</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/exos-snmp-filter/m-p/22116#M1767</link>
      <description>&lt;B&gt;@Frank&lt;/B&gt; - observium is very helpful but it is only usable if the snmp poller need less than 5 minutes &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":confused_face:"&gt;😕&lt;/span&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
@ James - thank you very much for this notice. I will try this tool asap.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2016 19:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/exos-snmp-filter/m-p/22116#M1767</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-12T19:15:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: EXOS SNMP filter</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/exos-snmp-filter/m-p/22117#M1768</link>
      <description>I tried librenms but it's the same poller mechanism as observium uses it.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2016 19:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/exos-snmp-filter/m-p/22117#M1768</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-12T19:15:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: EXOS SNMP filter</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/exos-snmp-filter/m-p/22119#M1770</link>
      <description>Chris,&lt;BR /&gt;
Check the output of &lt;DIV class="threadCode"&gt;&lt;B&gt;code:&lt;/B&gt;&lt;PRE spellcheck="false"&gt;show management&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;.  You're looking for these lines near the bottom:&lt;BR /&gt;
SNMP Compatibility Options       :&lt;BR /&gt;
    GETBULK Reply Too Big Action : Too Big Error&lt;BR /&gt;
    IP Fragmentation             : DisallowThe "GETBULK Reply Action" is configurable with this option:&lt;BR /&gt;
X460-24t.2 # configure snmp compatibility get-bulk reply-too-big-action&lt;BR /&gt;
  standard        Generate a response as per the standard&lt;BR /&gt;
  too-big-error   Generate a 'too big error' response (Default)Note that these large responses can potentially bog down the switch while being generated and transmitted... you may want to first test in a lab or other controlled environment.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
-Drew</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2016 00:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/exos-snmp-filter/m-p/22119#M1770</guid>
      <dc:creator>Drew_C</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-13T00:33:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: EXOS SNMP filter</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/exos-snmp-filter/m-p/22120#M1771</link>
      <description>Hi Drew, thanks for your answer.&lt;BR /&gt;
This would be helpful. </description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2016 00:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/exos-snmp-filter/m-p/22120#M1771</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-13T00:33:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

