<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Port-Specific VLAN Tag alternative on X620 in ExtremeSwitching (EXOS/Switch Engine)</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/port-specific-vlan-tag-alternative-on-x620/m-p/71784#M18916</link>
    <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I am currently migrating from X670 (G1) series to X620 switches only there is one problem.&lt;BR /&gt;
 Currently port specific port specific tags are being used which aren’t available on X620.&lt;BR /&gt;
 The situation is that on a few ports (2) there are multiple vlan tags present, these vlans in the&lt;BR /&gt;
 current situation are being “merged” into one vlan with port specific tags.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I’ve tried to solve this problem by using super/subvlans but is looks like this is doing some&lt;BR /&gt;
 sort of proxy-arp thing and is quite dependent on the layer 3 (routes/VR/IP-addresses) configuration of the switches. Is it possible to do something like port specific tag on de X620 to solve my problem?</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2019 21:33:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>malusb</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-06-17T21:33:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Port-Specific VLAN Tag alternative on X620</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/port-specific-vlan-tag-alternative-on-x620/m-p/71784#M18916</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I am currently migrating from X670 (G1) series to X620 switches only there is one problem.&lt;BR /&gt;
 Currently port specific port specific tags are being used which aren’t available on X620.&lt;BR /&gt;
 The situation is that on a few ports (2) there are multiple vlan tags present, these vlans in the&lt;BR /&gt;
 current situation are being “merged” into one vlan with port specific tags.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I’ve tried to solve this problem by using super/subvlans but is looks like this is doing some&lt;BR /&gt;
 sort of proxy-arp thing and is quite dependent on the layer 3 (routes/VR/IP-addresses) configuration of the switches. Is it possible to do something like port specific tag on de X620 to solve my problem?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2019 21:33:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/port-specific-vlan-tag-alternative-on-x620/m-p/71784#M18916</guid>
      <dc:creator>malusb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-17T21:33:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

