<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic RE: edge-safeguard enabled by default in ExtremeSwitching (EXOS/Switch Engine)</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/edge-safeguard-enabled-by-default/m-p/23576#M2345</link>
    <description>Wow Extreme knows how to make life easy for network admins ! ahah&lt;BR /&gt;
So each time you change a VLAN on a port, you also need to change the STP config ? What is auto-bind made for in that case?</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 13:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>julienb</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-03-01T13:45:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>edge-safeguard enabled by default</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/edge-safeguard-enabled-by-default/m-p/23572#M2341</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Is there a way to enable by default for every ports the STP mode edge-safeguard with bpdu-restrict ? Like the "spanning-tree portfast default" and "spanning-tree portfast bpduguard default" on Cisco switches.&lt;BR /&gt;
I'd like to enable the edge-safeguard mode for every port, and add an exception on trunk/dot1q ports.&lt;BR /&gt;
Is that possible ?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I've tried to enable it for every ports in each instance like that :&lt;BR /&gt;
configure stpd s0 ports edge-safeguard enable 1-24 bpdu-restrict recovery-timeout 300&lt;BR /&gt;
configure stpd s900 ports edge-safeguard enable 1-24 bpdu-restrict recovery-timeout 300&lt;BR /&gt;
configure stpd s903 ports edge-safeguard enable 1-24 bpdu-restrict recovery-timeout 300&lt;BR /&gt;
configure stpd s914 ports edge-safeguard enable 1-24 bpdu-restrict recovery-timeout 300&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
But since the ports are not in the instance yet (auto-bind enabled), it throws an error for all ports :&lt;BR /&gt;
Error: Port 1 is not a member of STP domain s900&lt;BR /&gt;
Error: Port 2 is not a member of STP domain s900&lt;BR /&gt;
etc...&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Here is the whole STP config (the goal is to be compatible with rapid-pvst+ on Cisco):&lt;BR /&gt;
configure stpd s0 mode dot1w&lt;BR /&gt;
configure stpd s0 default-encapsulation pvst-plus&lt;BR /&gt;
create stpd s823&lt;BR /&gt;
configure stpd s823 default-encapsulation pvst-plus&lt;BR /&gt;
create stpd s900&lt;BR /&gt;
configure stpd s900 default-encapsulation pvst-plus&lt;BR /&gt;
create stpd s903&lt;BR /&gt;
configure stpd s903 default-encapsulation pvst-plus&lt;BR /&gt;
create stpd s914&lt;BR /&gt;
configure stpd s914 default-encapsulation pvst-plus&lt;BR /&gt;
create stpd s921&lt;BR /&gt;
configure stpd s921 default-encapsulation pvst-plus&lt;BR /&gt;
create stpd s923&lt;BR /&gt;
configure stpd s923 default-encapsulation pvst-plus&lt;BR /&gt;
enable stpd s823 auto-bind vlan 823&lt;BR /&gt;
enable stpd s923 auto-bind vlan 923&lt;BR /&gt;
enable stpd s903 auto-bind vlan 903&lt;BR /&gt;
enable stpd s900 auto-bind vlan 900&lt;BR /&gt;
enable stpd s921 auto-bind vlan 921&lt;BR /&gt;
enable stpd s914 auto-bind vlan 914&lt;BR /&gt;
enable stpd s0&lt;BR /&gt;
configure stpd s823 tag 823&lt;BR /&gt;
enable stpd s823&lt;BR /&gt;
configure stpd s900 tag 900&lt;BR /&gt;
enable stpd s900&lt;BR /&gt;
configure stpd s903 tag 903&lt;BR /&gt;
enable stpd s903&lt;BR /&gt;
configure stpd s914 tag 914&lt;BR /&gt;
enable stpd s914&lt;BR /&gt;
configure stpd s921 tag 921&lt;BR /&gt;
enable stpd s921&lt;BR /&gt;
configure stpd s923 tag 923&lt;BR /&gt;
enable stpd s923&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks for your help</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 01:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/edge-safeguard-enabled-by-default/m-p/23572#M2341</guid>
      <dc:creator>julienb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-28T01:32:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: edge-safeguard enabled by default</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/edge-safeguard-enabled-by-default/m-p/23573#M2342</link>
      <description>This is a nice script I have used to get you going.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="https://github.com/extremenetworks/EXOS_Apps/tree/master/EZ_SpanningTree" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener"&gt;https://github.com/extremenetworks/EXOS_Apps/tree/master/EZ_SpanningTree&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 02:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/edge-safeguard-enabled-by-default/m-p/23573#M2342</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jeremy_Gibbs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-28T02:53:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: edge-safeguard enabled by default</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/edge-safeguard-enabled-by-default/m-p/23574#M2343</link>
      <description>I don't get it. It says the script associates all vlans to instance s0 and configure it for MSTP. But in MSTP, you need one instance per VLAN right ? By the way, I need Rapid-PVST+, not MSTP.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 02:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/edge-safeguard-enabled-by-default/m-p/23574#M2343</guid>
      <dc:creator>julienb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-28T02:53:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: edge-safeguard enabled by default</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/edge-safeguard-enabled-by-default/m-p/23575#M2344</link>
      <description>Hello Julienb.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
You can't make setting link type edge and enabling edge-safeguard by default.&lt;BR /&gt;
Anyway, even with the auto bind options on STPDs, it will not automatically be bound to the STPD if you add a port to a vlan as untagged since default-encapsulations are PVST+ on every STPD.&lt;BR /&gt;
So below two example lines are needed when you add a port to a vlan as untagged with edge-safeguard.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
conf "v823" add ports 5 untagged "s823" dot1d&lt;BR /&gt;
conf "s823" ports link-type edge 5 edge-safeguard enable bpdu-restrict recovery-timeout 300</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 13:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/edge-safeguard-enabled-by-default/m-p/23575#M2344</guid>
      <dc:creator>Roy_Noh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-01T13:45:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: edge-safeguard enabled by default</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/edge-safeguard-enabled-by-default/m-p/23576#M2345</link>
      <description>Wow Extreme knows how to make life easy for network admins ! ahah&lt;BR /&gt;
So each time you change a VLAN on a port, you also need to change the STP config ? What is auto-bind made for in that case?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 13:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/edge-safeguard-enabled-by-default/m-p/23576#M2345</guid>
      <dc:creator>julienb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-01T13:45:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: edge-safeguard enabled by default</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/edge-safeguard-enabled-by-default/m-p/23577#M2346</link>
      <description>I totally agree here, this is ridiculous. New to EXOS and I have to use PVST+ for interoperability.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 13:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/edge-safeguard-enabled-by-default/m-p/23577#M2346</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vincent_Boucher</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-01T13:45:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: edge-safeguard enabled by default</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/edge-safeguard-enabled-by-default/m-p/23578#M2347</link>
      <description>LOL .. getting my popcorn ready... who runs spanning tree now days... with so many other ways to build rings and redundancy and prevent broadcast loops    2000 plus switches and there has been no spanning tree in over at least ten years &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2018 20:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/edge-safeguard-enabled-by-default/m-p/23578#M2347</guid>
      <dc:creator>EtherMAN</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-17T20:32:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: edge-safeguard enabled by default</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/edge-safeguard-enabled-by-default/m-p/23579#M2348</link>
      <description>Anyway, I need PVST+. To add a port to a STPd, you need the carrier vlan to be tagged on the port, even for an edge port or it won't join the STP domain. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If I use the tagged vlan on my edge port, I can add the port to the stpd. But now the traffic is tagged. This means I would have to create a separate vlan for each PVST+ domain. This is counter productive and probably the worst implementation of PVST+.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Using Cisco switches, you need 3 lines of configuration for this. With EXOS, I'm up to 104 lines of configuration and it only works for tagged traffic on trunk ports, it won't work for untagged ports. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
What do you recommend instead of STP?&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2018 20:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/edge-safeguard-enabled-by-default/m-p/23579#M2348</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vincent_Boucher</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-17T20:32:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: edge-safeguard enabled by default</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/edge-safeguard-enabled-by-default/m-p/23580#M2349</link>
      <description>&lt;A href="https://gtacknowledge.extremenetworks.com/articles/Q_A/Can-you-configure-an-STP-domain-using-PVST-encapsulation-and-have-untaggged-ports-in-the-domain" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener"&gt;https://gtacknowledge.extremenetworks.com/articles/Q_A/Can-you-configure-an-STP-domain-using-PVST-en...&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2018 20:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/edge-safeguard-enabled-by-default/m-p/23580#M2349</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vincent_Boucher</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-17T20:32:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: edge-safeguard enabled by default</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/edge-safeguard-enabled-by-default/m-p/23581#M2350</link>
      <description>Sorry but I could not resist.. We have a lot of legacy Cisco customers we transport across our network.  Best thing for us is using a vman on our side ... protecting our rings with EAPS or ERPS,  Untagging vman at the edges on the UNI ports.  Dont have to know anything about the Cisco vlans that are being used and any of the PVST that they may want to extend across the network.  They can even run CDP across if you configure the port to tunnel the L2PT traffic.  I do understand your pain when you try to turn an Extreme switch into a Cisco switch.  EAPS and ERPS rock and will outperform any STP or PVST+ on failover times.  If you dont have an option to tunnel the Cisco stuff across and must actively participate and be part of their spanning tree domains then I am afraid your options are limited .... &lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2018 21:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/edge-safeguard-enabled-by-default/m-p/23581#M2350</guid>
      <dc:creator>EtherMAN</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-17T21:30:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

