<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic RE: issues with SD-Wan and Extreme X450e-48p Stack in ExtremeSwitching (EXOS/Switch Engine)</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/issues-with-sd-wan-and-extreme-x450e-48p-stack/m-p/33650#M6428</link>
    <description>Thank you - I'll take a look.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2018 22:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jasonlsch</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-12-12T22:49:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>issues with SD-Wan and Extreme X450e-48p Stack</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/issues-with-sd-wan-and-extreme-x450e-48p-stack/m-p/33646#M6424</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi -&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have a X450e-48p Stack (eight switches) running 15.3.5.2 patch1-19. Having issues with SD-Wan devices. SD-Wan engineers are seeing lots of ARP requests coming from Stack flooding the SD-Wan.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I found this article: &lt;A href="https://extremeportal.force.com/ExtrArticleDetail?an=000089782" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener"&gt;https://extremeportal.force.com/ExtrArticleDetail?an=000089782&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have tried adding ‘configure iparp vr VR-Default max_pending_entries 256’ twice. Saved twice. Doesn't take. Can I not add that to a stack? The only iparp configuration is: 'configure iparp vr VR-Default max_entries 4096'&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is there any reason not to do this: &lt;A href="https://extremeportal.force.com/ExtrArticleDetail?an=000082722" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener"&gt;https://extremeportal.force.com/ExtrArticleDetail?an=000082722&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;'disable flooding unicast ports all'&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What is the best way to slow down ARP requests coming from Stack?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks for any help.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2018 06:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/issues-with-sd-wan-and-extreme-x450e-48p-stack/m-p/33646#M6424</guid>
      <dc:creator>jasonlsch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-12T06:33:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: issues with SD-Wan and Extreme X450e-48p Stack</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/issues-with-sd-wan-and-extreme-x450e-48p-stack/m-p/33647#M6425</link>
      <description>Hi  &lt;A href="https://ext.connectedcommunity.org/profile?UserKey=e201962a-3050-4888-9dd1-d4b2f9526f87" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener"&gt; jasonlsch &lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
256 may be the default setting. If you run the command "show config detail | include max_pending_entries" does it have 256 as the setting in there?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks&lt;BR /&gt;
Brad</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2018 06:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/issues-with-sd-wan-and-extreme-x450e-48p-stack/m-p/33647#M6425</guid>
      <dc:creator>BradP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-12T06:52:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: issues with SD-Wan and Extreme X450e-48p Stack</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/issues-with-sd-wan-and-extreme-x450e-48p-stack/m-p/33648#M6426</link>
      <description>yes it is.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
so is:&lt;BR /&gt;
configure iparp vr VR-Mgmt max_pending_entries 256&lt;BR /&gt;
configure neighbor-discovery vr VR-Default max_pending_entries 1024&lt;BR /&gt;
configure neighbor-discovery vr VR-Mgmt max_pending_entries 1024&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2018 06:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/issues-with-sd-wan-and-extreme-x450e-48p-stack/m-p/33648#M6426</guid>
      <dc:creator>jasonlsch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-12T06:58:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: issues with SD-Wan and Extreme X450e-48p Stack</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/issues-with-sd-wan-and-extreme-x450e-48p-stack/m-p/33649#M6427</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;OK. The article states to reduce from the default 256 to somewhere in the range of 50-150. This is going to vary from network-to-network and we can't really make a recommendation for a proper value because we aren't familiar with your installation scenario.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regarding disabling unicast flooding, it may make more sense to rate-limit instead:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://extremeportal.force.com/ExtrArticleDetail?an=000082704" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener"&gt;https://extremeportal.force.com/ExtrArticleDetail?an=000082704&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm not sure how that will impact your goal.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Brad&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2018 07:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/issues-with-sd-wan-and-extreme-x450e-48p-stack/m-p/33649#M6427</guid>
      <dc:creator>BradP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-12T07:13:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: issues with SD-Wan and Extreme X450e-48p Stack</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/issues-with-sd-wan-and-extreme-x450e-48p-stack/m-p/33650#M6428</link>
      <description>Thank you - I'll take a look.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2018 22:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/issues-with-sd-wan-and-extreme-x450e-48p-stack/m-p/33650#M6428</guid>
      <dc:creator>jasonlsch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-12T22:49:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: issues with SD-Wan and Extreme X450e-48p Stack</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/issues-with-sd-wan-and-extreme-x450e-48p-stack/m-p/33651#M6429</link>
      <description>I am very curious and interested in your final outcome as we are in the beginning of deploying a SD-WAN offering on our Metro network.  Would love to know what SD-WAN vendor you are using.  We elected to go with a combination of 2 Velocloud and Telari.  We tested for 2 months the Velocloud solution connected between three sites and one had a Stack of 460 and 670's.  WE ran a 40 user remote office with sip phones and desktops through the SD-Wan as our test bed and did not have ant issues... Extreme switches have always been a bit heavy on the amount of arp requests that get sent out IMO&amp;gt;.. we did not have to tweak anything on the Extreme side to make things work... &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Really look forward on more intel as you work through this...</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2018 22:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/issues-with-sd-wan-and-extreme-x450e-48p-stack/m-p/33651#M6429</guid>
      <dc:creator>EtherMAN</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-12T22:56:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: issues with SD-Wan and Extreme X450e-48p Stack</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/issues-with-sd-wan-and-extreme-x450e-48p-stack/m-p/33652#M6430</link>
      <description>We have two CenturyLink managed Advantech FWA-2320's running Versa software. My X450e-48p Stack (eight switches) was installed in 2008. We put SD-Wan's into production last August. We have never been able to get VRRP working. Whenever we enable it on the SD-Wan it eventually takes down the network. The Secondary device tries to become the Primary while the Primary is up:&lt;BR /&gt;
 &lt;BR /&gt;
vrrp      vrrpV3NewMaster        2018-12-11T16:34:10-0 LM-844189: 10.106.0.113 became MASTER [interface vni-0/4.0, index 1054, group-id 1] Reason: masterNoResponse      &lt;BR /&gt;
 &lt;BR /&gt;
SD-Wan techs are blaming Extreme switches for excessive ARP requests. They think the Stack is causing a broadcast storm: https://gtacknowledge.extremenetworks.com/articles/Solution/VRRP-flap-due-to-high-number-of-broadcast-packet. I don't have VRRP enabled on Stack.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I haven't been able to do a tcpdump from Stack while VRRP is enabled on SD-Wan. But I did one before and was able to see that there are VRRP requests coming from Primary SD-Wan.&lt;BR /&gt;
1768 2018-12-04 20:41:57.858630 192.168.1.111 224.0.0.18 VRRP 60 Announcement (v3)&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Any help would be greatly appreciated.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2018 23:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/issues-with-sd-wan-and-extreme-x450e-48p-stack/m-p/33652#M6430</guid>
      <dc:creator>jasonlsch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-12T23:30:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: issues with SD-Wan and Extreme X450e-48p Stack</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/issues-with-sd-wan-and-extreme-x450e-48p-stack/m-p/33653#M6431</link>
      <description>EtherMAN -&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
We continue to have issues with VRRP. I'm curious about your setup. Do you have SD-Wan's plugged into one switch in Stack? or two switches in stack? Are ports tagged or untagged? I have both SD-Wan LAN ports on Primary and Secondary plugged into one physical switch in my Stack. They are untagged ports. When I enable VRRP, pings to 8.8.8.8 go from solid:  Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=121 to mulitiple 'Request timed out' followed by a few  Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=234ms TTL=121 followed by more 'Request timed out' etc. It looks like I'm looping the network.&lt;BR /&gt;
CPU also spikes:&lt;BR /&gt;
top&lt;BR /&gt;
Mem: 250184K used, 4452K free, 0K shrd, 20724K buff, 44432K cached&lt;BR /&gt;
 CPU: 10.9% usr 17.0% sys 0.0% nic 0.6% idle 0.0% io 18.5% irq 50.8% sirq&lt;BR /&gt;
 Load average: 11.46 9.16 7.69 14/173 2001&lt;BR /&gt;
 PID PPID USER STAT RSS %MEM CPU %CPU COMMAND&lt;BR /&gt;
 1275 2 root RW&amp;lt; 0 0.0 0 64.9 [tbcm_msm_tx1]&lt;BR /&gt;
1445 2 root S 4252 1.6 0 5.7 ./fdb&lt;BR /&gt;
1524 1 root R 21516 8.4 0 4.2 ./etmon&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2018 00:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/issues-with-sd-wan-and-extreme-x450e-48p-stack/m-p/33653#M6431</guid>
      <dc:creator>jasonlsch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-19T00:02:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

