<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic EXOS access-list / policy question in ExtremeSwitching (EXOS/Switch Engine)</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/exos-access-list-policy-question/m-p/17931#M673</link>
    <description>For an customer project i use access-list / policy to block VRRP multicast traffic to achieve VRRP Active / Active Situation. i have a X670V with V16.1.2.14 patch 1-4.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
To block multicast traffic i have to apply the ACL to the ISC Link - in my setup this is a sharing of 1:49 and 2:49 (40GB Link).&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
My question is now - why should i have to bind the ACL in both sharing ports (it only works if i bind this in both ports) ?! I expect because this is a sharing link i have only bind this to the config master port ?!&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Secondly -  how can i check if a ACL have hits ?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
* Slot-1 XXXXXXX.29 # sh access-list counter ingress&lt;BR /&gt;
* Slot-1 XXXXXXX.29 #&lt;BR /&gt;
* Slot-1 XXXXXXX.31 # sh access-list counter ports 2:49 ingress&lt;BR /&gt;
* Slot-1 XXXXXXX.31 #&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
No Command (which i guess that seems to be correct) does generate any output!&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Bug or feature ?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Regards&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 20:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>M_Nees</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-03-01T20:00:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>EXOS access-list / policy question</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/exos-access-list-policy-question/m-p/17931#M673</link>
      <description>For an customer project i use access-list / policy to block VRRP multicast traffic to achieve VRRP Active / Active Situation. i have a X670V with V16.1.2.14 patch 1-4.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
To block multicast traffic i have to apply the ACL to the ISC Link - in my setup this is a sharing of 1:49 and 2:49 (40GB Link).&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
My question is now - why should i have to bind the ACL in both sharing ports (it only works if i bind this in both ports) ?! I expect because this is a sharing link i have only bind this to the config master port ?!&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Secondly -  how can i check if a ACL have hits ?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
* Slot-1 XXXXXXX.29 # sh access-list counter ingress&lt;BR /&gt;
* Slot-1 XXXXXXX.29 #&lt;BR /&gt;
* Slot-1 XXXXXXX.31 # sh access-list counter ports 2:49 ingress&lt;BR /&gt;
* Slot-1 XXXXXXX.31 #&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
No Command (which i guess that seems to be correct) does generate any output!&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Bug or feature ?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Regards&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 20:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/exos-access-list-policy-question/m-p/17931#M673</guid>
      <dc:creator>M_Nees</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-01T20:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: EXOS access-list / policy question</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/exos-access-list-policy-question/m-p/17932#M674</link>
      <description>Hi Matthias, since you are using LAG, the Mcast traffic might be using both links. Therefore, to accomplish the active/active VRRP scenario, the VRRP mcast address should be blocked on both ports (ISC link).&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
You can see any hit in the ACL by adding a counter into the ACL policy.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;U&gt;Example:&lt;/U&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;I&gt;entry vrrp-block-rule {&lt;/I&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;I&gt;           if {&lt;/I&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;I&gt;               destination-address 224.0.0.18/32 ;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;I&gt;                         } then {&lt;/I&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;I&gt;                                deny ;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;/I&gt;&lt;B&gt;                                counter matchvrrp;&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;I&gt;                                    }&lt;/I&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;I&gt;}&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;/I&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;U&gt;To check the counter:&lt;/U&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;I&gt;show access-list counter (if the ACL is applied on ingress direction)&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;/I&gt;&lt;I&gt;show access-list counter egress (if the ACL is applied on egress direction)&lt;/I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;/I&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 20:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/exos-access-list-policy-question/m-p/17932#M674</guid>
      <dc:creator>Henrique</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-01T20:51:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: EXOS access-list / policy question</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/exos-access-list-policy-question/m-p/17933#M675</link>
      <description>Thanks Henrique!&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Can you explain me why i have to bind the acl not only to the sharing master port ? it only work if i bind it to all ports that belongs to sharing group!&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Regards&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 22:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/exos-access-list-policy-question/m-p/17933#M675</guid>
      <dc:creator>M_Nees</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-01T22:27:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: EXOS access-list / policy question</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/exos-access-list-policy-question/m-p/17934#M676</link>
      <description>Hi, ACL are LAG agnostic, you need to apply them on each physical ports.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 22:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/exos-access-list-policy-question/m-p/17934#M676</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephane_Grosj1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-01T22:45:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

