<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic RE: EAPS in ExtremeSwitching (EXOS/Switch Engine)</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/eaps/m-p/34424#M6741</link>
    <description>Create Date: Sep  7 2013  3:08AM&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
From the CLI Reference Guide...&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;I&gt;Each node on the ring connects through two ring ports. One port must be configured as the primary&lt;BR /&gt;
port; the other must be configured as the secondary port.&lt;BR /&gt;
The primary and secondary ports have significance only on a master node. The health-check messages&lt;BR /&gt;
are sent out the primary port of the master node, and the master node blocks the protected VLANs on&lt;BR /&gt;
the secondary port.&lt;BR /&gt;
The master node’s secondary EAPS port cannot be configured on ports that are already configured as&lt;BR /&gt;
follows:&lt;BR /&gt;
• Shared-port&lt;BR /&gt;
• MLAG ISC port&lt;BR /&gt;
There is no distinction between the primary and secondary ports on a transit node.&lt;/I&gt;  (from Daniel_Flouret)</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 06:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>EtherNation_Use</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-01-08T06:04:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>EAPS</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/eaps/m-p/34423#M6740</link>
      <description>Create Date: Jul 12 2013  8:48AM&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Hi&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Have a very quick query about EAPS.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Can two nodes in an EAPS ring have joining secondary or primary ports? It doesn't mention anything in the EAPS tech note so I assume this is ok?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks&lt;BR /&gt;
Ian  (from Ian_Broadway)</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 06:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/eaps/m-p/34423#M6740</guid>
      <dc:creator>EtherNation_Use</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-01-08T06:04:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: EAPS</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/eaps/m-p/34424#M6741</link>
      <description>Create Date: Sep  7 2013  3:08AM&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
From the CLI Reference Guide...&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;I&gt;Each node on the ring connects through two ring ports. One port must be configured as the primary&lt;BR /&gt;
port; the other must be configured as the secondary port.&lt;BR /&gt;
The primary and secondary ports have significance only on a master node. The health-check messages&lt;BR /&gt;
are sent out the primary port of the master node, and the master node blocks the protected VLANs on&lt;BR /&gt;
the secondary port.&lt;BR /&gt;
The master node’s secondary EAPS port cannot be configured on ports that are already configured as&lt;BR /&gt;
follows:&lt;BR /&gt;
• Shared-port&lt;BR /&gt;
• MLAG ISC port&lt;BR /&gt;
There is no distinction between the primary and secondary ports on a transit node.&lt;/I&gt;  (from Daniel_Flouret)</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 06:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/eaps/m-p/34424#M6741</guid>
      <dc:creator>EtherNation_Use</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-01-08T06:04:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

