<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic RE: Compatibility between EAPS and G.8032 ERPS in ExtremeSwitching (EXOS/Switch Engine)</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/compatibility-between-eaps-and-g-8032-erps/m-p/38440#M8280</link>
    <description>Hello Ken&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
the two can interoperate if one is a sub-ring of the other.  They will send will send flush notifications.  You cannot create one ring with some nodes using EAPS and others using ERPS/G.8032.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Does that help?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
P&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 21:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Paul_Russo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-10-22T21:03:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Compatibility between EAPS and G.8032 ERPS</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/compatibility-between-eaps-and-g-8032-erps/m-p/38439#M8279</link>
      <description>hi Experts,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Can EAPS interoperable with G.8032 ERPS?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://www.google.com.hk/url?sa=t&amp;amp;#38;rct=j&amp;amp;#38;q=&amp;amp;#38;esrc=s&amp;amp;#38;source=web&amp;amp;#38;cd=1&amp;amp;#38;cad=rja&amp;amp;#38;uact=8&amp;amp;#38;ved=0CB0QFjAA&amp;amp;#38;url=http%3A%2F%2Fextrcdn.extremenetworks.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F04%2FLayer_2_Protocols.pdf&amp;amp;#38;ei=P8xHVPnIK9iRuAS1jYKYDw&amp;amp;#38;usg=AFQjCNFKzOxyqmHPl-71-MklWiFdZoEkLA&amp;amp;#38;sig2=xoHkFQWLAJZc6ytBJg8UXg" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener"&gt;http://extrcdn.extremenetworks.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Layer_2_Protocols.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
From P.68, it mentions:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
• Basic interoperability with EAPS with G.8032 acting as an access ring. Flush notifications will be sent Link monitoring using CFM or native local link monitoring methods.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
it shows that it is interoperable, just wanna know more detail on that.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
if a network running EAPS and there is some old device with G.8032, just wanna know if that old gear can interoperable with the EAPS. thx.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Ken&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 20:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/compatibility-between-eaps-and-g-8032-erps/m-p/38439#M8279</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ken_Johnathan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-22T20:29:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Compatibility between EAPS and G.8032 ERPS</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/compatibility-between-eaps-and-g-8032-erps/m-p/38440#M8280</link>
      <description>Hello Ken&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
the two can interoperate if one is a sub-ring of the other.  They will send will send flush notifications.  You cannot create one ring with some nodes using EAPS and others using ERPS/G.8032.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Does that help?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
P&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 21:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/compatibility-between-eaps-and-g-8032-erps/m-p/38440#M8280</guid>
      <dc:creator>Paul_Russo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-22T21:03:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Compatibility between EAPS and G.8032 ERPS</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/compatibility-between-eaps-and-g-8032-erps/m-p/38441#M8281</link>
      <description>Hi P,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks for the prompt reply.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
as i just planning for a migration from EAPS to ERPS as below, the new core supports ERPS only.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
step 1: connect the new core as ERPs to the existing EAPS core:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P class="fancybox-image"&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="e36d41d395b04549beaa72d00bccde96_RackMultipart20141022-12514-thcf7s-Step1_inline.png"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/2147i174F16CD8B230D99/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="e36d41d395b04549beaa72d00bccde96_RackMultipart20141022-12514-thcf7s-Step1_inline.png" alt="e36d41d395b04549beaa72d00bccde96_RackMultipart20141022-12514-thcf7s-Step1_inline.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Step 2: migrate TOR with 1 uplink to new core  (erps) and 1 uplink still connecting to existing core. (eaps)&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
is it possible? Or i need to configure the ERPS on the existing TOR and Core too? thx.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P class="fancybox-image"&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="e36d41d395b04549beaa72d00bccde96_RackMultipart20141022-23632-n4rq4q-Step2_inline.png"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/976iE697CD3CFECE2491/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="e36d41d395b04549beaa72d00bccde96_RackMultipart20141022-23632-n4rq4q-Step2_inline.png" alt="e36d41d395b04549beaa72d00bccde96_RackMultipart20141022-23632-n4rq4q-Step2_inline.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Actually, i just wanna achieve a migration without down time. thx.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Ken&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 21:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/compatibility-between-eaps-and-g-8032-erps/m-p/38441#M8281</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ken_Johnathan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-22T21:15:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Compatibility between EAPS and G.8032 ERPS</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/compatibility-between-eaps-and-g-8032-erps/m-p/38442#M8282</link>
      <description>hi P,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
i think it is feasible if ERPs can be a sub-ring of EAPs as below:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
    Step 1: Remove 1 uplink from TOR&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
    Step 2: Disable EAPs on TOR (as  no longer a loop at that moment&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
    &lt;P class="fancybox-image"&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="4df67c9f16854c04af95ce3fdec52963_RackMultipart20141022-11394-1r8wnk1-Step3_inline.png"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/868i80DED16CF7E3AB07/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="4df67c9f16854c04af95ce3fdec52963_RackMultipart20141022-11394-1r8wnk1-Step3_inline.png" alt="4df67c9f16854c04af95ce3fdec52963_RackMultipart20141022-11394-1r8wnk1-Step3_inline.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Step 3:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P class="fancybox-image"&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="4df67c9f16854c04af95ce3fdec52963_RackMultipart20141022-15400-8kcdl7-Step4_inline.png"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/1129iA57AA468625E6D87/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="4df67c9f16854c04af95ce3fdec52963_RackMultipart20141022-15400-8kcdl7-Step4_inline.png" alt="4df67c9f16854c04af95ce3fdec52963_RackMultipart20141022-15400-8kcdl7-Step4_inline.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I think it is doable. Pls comment. thx.&lt;BR /&gt;
The new core is X8 but we wanna replace EAPs with ERPs through this exercise. thx.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Br,&lt;BR /&gt;
Ken&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 21:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/compatibility-between-eaps-and-g-8032-erps/m-p/38442#M8282</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ken_Johnathan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-22T21:45:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Compatibility between EAPS and G.8032 ERPS</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/compatibility-between-eaps-and-g-8032-erps/m-p/38443#M8283</link>
      <description>Hi Paul,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
do u have comment on that? thx.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Br,&lt;BR /&gt;
Ken&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2014 08:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/compatibility-between-eaps-and-g-8032-erps/m-p/38443#M8283</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ken_Johnathan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-24T08:26:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Compatibility between EAPS and G.8032 ERPS</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/compatibility-between-eaps-and-g-8032-erps/m-p/38444#M8284</link>
      <description>If its a datacenter that too with  BDx8.&lt;BR /&gt;
why cant we migrate to  MLAG.&lt;BR /&gt;
Reliable for datacenter.&lt;BR /&gt;
15.3.1.4 --Latest patch is the most stable for MLag.&lt;BR /&gt;
We can have active/active for VRRP .&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I am not saying EAPS or ERPS is bad but MLAG in datacenter is really the best</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2014 14:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/compatibility-between-eaps-and-g-8032-erps/m-p/38444#M8284</guid>
      <dc:creator>PARTHIBAN_CHINN</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-24T14:55:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Compatibility between EAPS and G.8032 ERPS</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/compatibility-between-eaps-and-g-8032-erps/m-p/38445#M8285</link>
      <description>Hello Ken. Apologize for the delay I have been traveling.   I believe your design will work.  I also think that MA as mentioned by Parthiban would be a bettwe design.  It provides redundancy like EAPS without the blocking    P</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2014 17:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/compatibility-between-eaps-and-g-8032-erps/m-p/38445#M8285</guid>
      <dc:creator>Paul_Russo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-24T17:28:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

