https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/acl-and-stp/m-p/42228#M9910 Create Date: Aug 8 2012 12:54AM<BR /> <BR /> when I apply a "permit all packets" rule, I get the warning:<BR /> Note: An unconditional PERMIT action on an EAPS or STP blocked port will result in a loop. Adding an explicit match criteria such as ethernet-type will avoid these rules matching EAPS and STP PDUs.<BR /> when I use the rule<BR /> entry R1 {<BR /> if {<BR /> ethernet-destination-address 01:80:c2:00:00:00;<BR /> } then {<BR /> permit;<BR /> }<BR /> }<BR /> the Extreme is happy. But, does STP really work as expected?<BR /> If not: How can I use STP with an ACL with the last rule "deny all packets"?<BR /> (from Hans-Werner_Paulsen ) Wed, 08 Jan 2014 05:54:00 GMT EtherNation_Use 2014-01-08T05:54:00Z https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/acl-and-stp/m-p/42228#M9910 Create Date: Aug 8 2012 12:54AM<BR /> <BR /> when I apply a "permit all packets" rule, I get the warning:<BR /> Note: An unconditional PERMIT action on an EAPS or STP blocked port will result in a loop. Adding an explicit match criteria such as ethernet-type will avoid these rules matching EAPS and STP PDUs.<BR /> when I use the rule<BR /> entry R1 {<BR /> if {<BR /> ethernet-destination-address 01:80:c2:00:00:00;<BR /> } then {<BR /> permit;<BR /> }<BR /> }<BR /> the Extreme is happy. But, does STP really work as expected?<BR /> If not: How can I use STP with an ACL with the last rule "deny all packets"?<BR /> (from Hans-Werner_Paulsen ) Wed, 08 Jan 2014 05:54:00 GMT https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-exos-switch/acl-and-stp/m-p/42228#M9910 EtherNation_Use 2014-01-08T05:54:00Z