<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic RE: problem with LACP in ExtremeSwitching (Other)</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/problem-with-lacp/m-p/10106#M1134</link>
    <description>Hi Diogo.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I have the same problem.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Anybody more?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2018 01:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Paulo_Silva</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-04-28T01:10:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>problem with LACP</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/problem-with-lacp/m-p/10105#M1133</link>
      <description>We have been problems with a stack of switches when only one power phase failed, part of the stack shutdown. However,  if stack changes management, one of each ports attached into the uplink(LAG) is recognized as a path physical and not as LAG. Multiple MAC addresses are associated in this path, causing failed connections on the entire network.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
We can see in the stack and core that this port is a LAG´s member. In the core, macs are not physically associated in the port, but the stack it does.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
We had disabled and enabled the port, but the problem persists yet. The problem is only solved by resetting the switch stack.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Stack B5G124-48P2 - Firmware 6.81.10.0001 &lt;BR /&gt;
Port: ge.8.48&lt;BR /&gt;
Lag.0.1&lt;BR /&gt;
Key 103&lt;BR /&gt;
LACP enable&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Core S8 Bonded - Firmware 8.31.03.0001&lt;BR /&gt;
port ge.16.15&lt;BR /&gt;
lag.0.103&lt;BR /&gt;
key 103&lt;BR /&gt;
LACP enable&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Stack B5.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P class="fancybox-image"&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="cc85b71f2e374c778aa9be58b16e35c0_RackMultipart20180427-26482-xd2nm3-Stack_inline.jpg"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/4991i4238DDDB8EFFCCF7/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="cc85b71f2e374c778aa9be58b16e35c0_RackMultipart20180427-26482-xd2nm3-Stack_inline.jpg" alt="cc85b71f2e374c778aa9be58b16e35c0_RackMultipart20180427-26482-xd2nm3-Stack_inline.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
S8 Bonded&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P class="fancybox-image"&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="cc85b71f2e374c778aa9be58b16e35c0_RackMultipart20180427-73374-jctbna-S8_inline.jpg"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/1806i6FB43F3E02CBD325/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="cc85b71f2e374c778aa9be58b16e35c0_RackMultipart20180427-73374-jctbna-S8_inline.jpg" alt="cc85b71f2e374c778aa9be58b16e35c0_RackMultipart20180427-73374-jctbna-S8_inline.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
 &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Any Help?!&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 17:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/problem-with-lacp/m-p/10105#M1133</guid>
      <dc:creator>Diogo_Rocha1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-27T17:44:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: problem with LACP</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/problem-with-lacp/m-p/10106#M1134</link>
      <description>Hi Diogo.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I have the same problem.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Anybody more?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2018 01:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/problem-with-lacp/m-p/10106#M1134</guid>
      <dc:creator>Paulo_Silva</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-28T01:10:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: problem with LACP</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/problem-with-lacp/m-p/10107#M1135</link>
      <description>hy, we have the exact same setup - C5 and bonded S8&lt;BR /&gt;
there is a difference between lacp and static lag!&lt;BR /&gt;
here is our config for real lacp between C5 and S8&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
C5!!!&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
#port&lt;BR /&gt;
set port lacp port ge.1.47 aadminkey 1&lt;BR /&gt;
set port lacp port ge.1.48 aadminkey 1&lt;BR /&gt;
set port lacp port ge.1.47 enable&lt;BR /&gt;
set port lacp port ge.1.48 enable&lt;BR /&gt;
#lacp&lt;BR /&gt;
set lacp aadminkey lag.0.1 1&lt;BR /&gt;
set lacp singleportlag enable&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
C5(su)-&amp;gt;show port status ge.1.47-48;lag.0.1&lt;BR /&gt;
          Alias        Oper    Admin   Speed&lt;BR /&gt;
Port      (truncated)  Status  Status  (bps)     Duplex  Type&lt;BR /&gt;
--------- ------------ ------- ------- --------- ------- ------------&lt;BR /&gt;
ge.1.47   Uplink-S8    dormant Up      1.0G      full    Combo RJ45/1000-sx/PoE&lt;BR /&gt;
ge.1.48   Uplink-S8    dormant Up      1.0G      full    Combo RJ45/1000-sx/PoE&lt;BR /&gt;
lag.0.1   Uplink-S8    Up      Up      2.0G      full    lag&lt;BR /&gt;
C5(su)-&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
S8!!!&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
S8(su)-&amp;gt;show port status |find -C5&lt;BR /&gt;
ge.6.107     C5 dormant  up        1.0G full    1000-sx      lc&lt;BR /&gt;
ge.13.107    C5       dormant  up        1.0G full    1000-sx      lc&lt;BR /&gt;
lag.0.112    C5 up       up        2.0G         lag&lt;BR /&gt;
S8(su)-&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
#port&lt;BR /&gt;
set port lacp port ge.5.112 aadminkey 125&lt;BR /&gt;
set port lacp port ge.14.112 aadminkey 125&lt;BR /&gt;
set port lacp port ge.5.112 enable&lt;BR /&gt;
set port lacp port ge.14.112 enable&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
#lacp&lt;BR /&gt;
set lacp aadminkey lag.0.125 125&lt;BR /&gt;
set lacp singleportlag enable&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
this setup is working on our infrastructure since years&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
BR&lt;BR /&gt;
Anton</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2018 15:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/problem-with-lacp/m-p/10107#M1135</guid>
      <dc:creator>AntonS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-30T15:32:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: problem with LACP</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/problem-with-lacp/m-p/10108#M1136</link>
      <description>I think the command:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
set lacp singleportlag enable&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
as shown in Anton's config will resolve the issue.  Without that command, if the LAG loses port(s) so that it is only a single port, it will revert to that port, and the LAG will show as down.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
check your configuration when you only have one active port in your LAG; ensure that the LAG shows as up, and the port shows as dormant.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Bill&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2018 17:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/problem-with-lacp/m-p/10108#M1136</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bill_Handler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-30T17:47:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: problem with LACP</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/problem-with-lacp/m-p/10109#M1137</link>
      <description>Tks for reply Srs. &lt;BR /&gt;
I have the same LACP conf. &lt;BR /&gt;
All my lags are controlled by LACP as I Said. &lt;BR /&gt;
I have singleportlag enable too. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
My problem is only when the MASTER of B5 stack becomes down.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
When occur a change of master, one of the three uplinks shows communication for many MAC ADDRESSES as a Physical path .&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
BY the comand "show port lacp port status ..." I can see the port attached on lag correctly. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;B&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Resuming, &lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
I Have 3 uplinks with the same conf. &lt;BR /&gt;
aadminkey, LAcp enable, Single port lag Enable and assigned with same KEY.&lt;BR /&gt;
I don´t have Static lag. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
We have 8 B5 on each stack.&lt;BR /&gt;
Uplinks on switch 1, 4 and 8. port 48.&lt;BR /&gt;
Lets Assume the manager is the second switch:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
IF the switches 1 2 and 3 becames down, i still have a LAG with 2 ports and the network still OK. But the manager have to change for a UP Switch. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
That transition occur, normally, on the same time that the first switch return in operation. &lt;BR /&gt;
When the first switch return, i can see MACS phisically on port ge.1.48, &lt;BR /&gt;
and the port ge.1.48 is member of the same lag that still operating.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;B&gt;The results:&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;B&gt;Show port Status&lt;/B&gt; - shows the port ge.1.48 is dormant and the lag is 3 GB (3 ports)&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;B&gt;Show port lacp port ge.1.48 status detail&lt;/B&gt; - shows the port ge.1.48 have LACP enable and listening the same partner for the other 2 paths. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;B&gt;Show mac port ge.4.48 and ge.8.48&lt;/B&gt; - dont show anything&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;B&gt;show mac port ge.1.48&lt;/B&gt; - show many macs&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;B&gt;show mac port lag.0.1&lt;/B&gt; - show many macs&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;B&gt;network becomes Instable. &lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
to resolve temporally the problem, i have to shutdown the port ge.1.48. when the port is enable again the problem returns.&lt;BR /&gt;
to resolve definitely the problem, i have to reset all switches of the stack on the same time. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
We dont have problem if the manager doesnt change. &lt;BR /&gt;
By the way, while manager is online, I can disable and enable the LAG ports on the same stack. &lt;BR /&gt;
These ports detach and attach normaly on LAG with no problem... &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2018 19:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/problem-with-lacp/m-p/10109#M1137</guid>
      <dc:creator>Diogo_Rocha1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-02T19:08:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: problem with LACP</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/problem-with-lacp/m-p/10110#M1138</link>
      <description>No one can help!?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2018 21:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/problem-with-lacp/m-p/10110#M1138</guid>
      <dc:creator>Diogo_Rocha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-09T21:15:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

