<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic RE: The best way for redundancy in a stack in ExtremeSwitching (Other)</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/the-best-way-for-redundancy-in-a-stack/m-p/11544#M2572</link>
    <description>Hi!&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I think that is better - LAG:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;UL&gt; 
&lt;LI&gt;redundancy 
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;traffic sharing between 2 ports (wider link) 
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;less latency 
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;less problems with microburst 
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;
Thank you!</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2019 18:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Alexandr_P</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-01-28T18:13:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>The best way for redundancy in a stack</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/the-best-way-for-redundancy-in-a-stack/m-p/11543#M2571</link>
      <description>Hi folks,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I'm wondering what's the best/right way of achieveing redunancy using stacked switches.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Let's assume I've got 1 server connected with 2 links to stacked switch - one link goes to Unit1 and second to Unit 2.&lt;BR /&gt;
Is it better to create a LAG group for these 2 ports  or configure port redundancy with &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;B&gt;configure ports  redundant  on&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
and what are pros/cons of each?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2019 18:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/the-best-way-for-redundancy-in-a-stack/m-p/11543#M2571</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mateusz_Haba</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-28T18:07:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: The best way for redundancy in a stack</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/the-best-way-for-redundancy-in-a-stack/m-p/11544#M2572</link>
      <description>Hi!&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I think that is better - LAG:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;UL&gt; 
&lt;LI&gt;redundancy 
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;traffic sharing between 2 ports (wider link) 
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;less latency 
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;less problems with microburst 
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;
Thank you!</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2019 18:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/the-best-way-for-redundancy-in-a-stack/m-p/11544#M2572</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alexandr_P</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-28T18:13:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: The best way for redundancy in a stack</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/the-best-way-for-redundancy-in-a-stack/m-p/11545#M2573</link>
      <description>&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
So in what case we want to use the second solution?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2019 18:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/the-best-way-for-redundancy-in-a-stack/m-p/11545#M2573</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mateusz_Haba</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-28T18:17:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: The best way for redundancy in a stack</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/the-best-way-for-redundancy-in-a-stack/m-p/11546#M2574</link>
      <description>For example, if you have 2 servers - one primary, second - backup.&lt;BR /&gt;
Or 2 switches, or 2 links to 2 different ISP.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thank you!</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2019 18:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/the-best-way-for-redundancy-in-a-stack/m-p/11546#M2574</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alexandr_P</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-28T18:48:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: The best way for redundancy in a stack</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/the-best-way-for-redundancy-in-a-stack/m-p/11547#M2575</link>
      <description>That makes more sense for me now. Thanks!</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2019 18:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/the-best-way-for-redundancy-in-a-stack/m-p/11547#M2575</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mateusz_Haba</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-28T18:51:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

