<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic RE: Remote Site Dual Link using IP Route Sharing in ExtremeSwitching (Other)</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/remote-site-dual-link-using-ip-route-sharing/m-p/11615#M2643</link>
    <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
you have link up on core switch and some packet/flows will go via link one and some via link two (it depends on sharing criteria). &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The core site doesn't know that one of the link on branch is down.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
--&lt;BR /&gt;
Jarek</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2015 14:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jarek</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-01-12T14:13:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Remote Site Dual Link using IP Route Sharing</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/remote-site-dual-link-using-ip-route-sharing/m-p/11612#M2640</link>
      <description>we are planning to add another WAN Link connection to our remote site, can we use the ip route sharing over WAN Link?    WAN link is L2 connection provided by telco.    Link 1 - VLAN 100  Link 2 - VLAN 200    thanks</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2015 09:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/remote-site-dual-link-using-ip-route-sharing/m-p/11612#M2640</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marlon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-09T09:10:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Remote Site Dual Link using IP Route Sharing</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/remote-site-dual-link-using-ip-route-sharing/m-p/11613#M2641</link>
      <description>yes this should be fine.&lt;BR /&gt;
with two static routes with same cost.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2015 13:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/remote-site-dual-link-using-ip-route-sharing/m-p/11613#M2641</guid>
      <dc:creator>PARTHIBAN_CHINN</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-09T13:22:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Remote Site Dual Link using IP Route Sharing</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/remote-site-dual-link-using-ip-route-sharing/m-p/11614#M2642</link>
      <description>Hi Parthiban,    please see my network diagram and configuration below below.  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  Data Center Core Switch:     enable ipforwarding   configure iproute add 172.30.1.0/24 172.20.1.246   configure iproute add 172.30.1.0/24 172.21.1.246   enable iproute sharing vr vr-default   enable loopback-mode vlan vlanserver  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  Branch Core Switch:    enable ipforwarding  configure iproute add 172.25.1.0/24 172.20.1.1  configure iproute add 172.25.1.0/24 172.21.1.1  enable iproute sharing vr vr-default  enable loopback-mode vlan vlanlan  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------      i can ping the 172.25.1.1 from 172.30.1.1 if VLAN100 is up. However i cannot ping the 172.25.1.1  from  172.30.1.1 once i disconnect the VLAN100 connection in branch core switch.     also, we check the iproute sharing using "show ipconfig" to confirm if enable.    thanks,  Marlon       &lt;P class="fancybox-image"&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="46a3ab270abf4bb48b9206b2d7b6b805_RackMultipart20150109-4654-1uot4fo-DualLinkNetwork_inline.jpg"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/778i6BA0C87D4318CE2C/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="46a3ab270abf4bb48b9206b2d7b6b805_RackMultipart20150109-4654-1uot4fo-DualLinkNetwork_inline.jpg" alt="46a3ab270abf4bb48b9206b2d7b6b805_RackMultipart20150109-4654-1uot4fo-DualLinkNetwork_inline.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2015 04:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/remote-site-dual-link-using-ip-route-sharing/m-p/11614#M2642</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marlon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-10T04:25:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Remote Site Dual Link using IP Route Sharing</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/remote-site-dual-link-using-ip-route-sharing/m-p/11615#M2643</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
you have link up on core switch and some packet/flows will go via link one and some via link two (it depends on sharing criteria). &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The core site doesn't know that one of the link on branch is down.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
--&lt;BR /&gt;
Jarek</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2015 14:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/remote-site-dual-link-using-ip-route-sharing/m-p/11615#M2643</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jarek</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-12T14:13:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Remote Site Dual Link using IP Route Sharing</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/remote-site-dual-link-using-ip-route-sharing/m-p/11616#M2644</link>
      <description>You should use static route with BFD to solve this issue.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2015 14:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/remote-site-dual-link-using-ip-route-sharing/m-p/11616#M2644</guid>
      <dc:creator>PARTHIBAN_CHINN</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-12T14:37:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Remote Site Dual Link using IP Route Sharing</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/remote-site-dual-link-using-ip-route-sharing/m-p/11617#M2645</link>
      <description>Hi Parthiban,    i already used static route with BFD but still have the same problem,    Core Switch    enable iproute bfd 172.20.1.246 vr vr-default  enable iproute bfd 172.21.1.246 vr vr-default      Branch Switch    enable iproute bfd 172.20.1.1 vr vr-default  enable iproute bfd 172.21.1.1 vr vr-dedault    based on the command " show bfd session" all status are up.    Thanks    Marlon  &lt;P class="fancybox-image"&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="86d5503388b04e7d8da8f104186f3c84_RackMultipart20150112-32390-1czds95-bfdsession_inline.jpg"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/4822i798C11968A280BE3/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="86d5503388b04e7d8da8f104186f3c84_RackMultipart20150112-32390-1czds95-bfdsession_inline.jpg" alt="86d5503388b04e7d8da8f104186f3c84_RackMultipart20150112-32390-1czds95-bfdsession_inline.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 00:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/remote-site-dual-link-using-ip-route-sharing/m-p/11617#M2645</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marlon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-13T00:34:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Remote Site Dual Link using IP Route Sharing</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/remote-site-dual-link-using-ip-route-sharing/m-p/11618#M2646</link>
      <description>after executing the command below on both switches, the core now can see if one of the branch link is down and then utilized the other link.    enable iproute bfd &lt;GATEWAY&gt; vr vr-default      thanks! Great Help!&lt;/GATEWAY&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2015 21:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/remote-site-dual-link-using-ip-route-sharing/m-p/11618#M2646</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marlon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-27T21:50:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

