<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Switch leaving a Stack with ports Up in ExtremeSwitching (Other)</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/switch-leaving-a-stack-with-ports-up/m-p/12182#M3210</link>
    <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
We have two stacks, each is made with 2 X670V-48t and 1 X670V-48x.&lt;BR /&gt;
Stacking has been done using alternate ports 47 and 48.&lt;BR /&gt;
Therefore 10G ports 45 and 49 on X670V-48t cannot be used.&lt;BR /&gt;
No VIM.&lt;BR /&gt;
Ports 45 to 48 are put as x in figure below:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
We need to set-up a uplink 2x10G LAG between each stacked swith (SW stack1 and SW stack2) and a Juniper FW Cluster (FW1_1 and FW1_2).&lt;BR /&gt;
In figure below, FW1_1 is Active while FW1_2 is Standby.&lt;BR /&gt;
As no VIM module available on X670V-48t, the only way to do this is to establish this LAG between X670V-48x &lt;BR /&gt;
and FW:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
SW stack1                        SW stack2&lt;BR /&gt;
-------------------------------    -------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;
                                 x x                                      x x&lt;BR /&gt;
 X670V-48t            x x       X670V-48t              x x&lt;BR /&gt;
-------------------------------    -------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;
                                 x x  &lt;BR /&gt;
 X670V-48t            x x       X670V-48t              x x&lt;BR /&gt;
-------------------------------    -------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;
                                 x x                                      x x&lt;BR /&gt;
 X670V-48x           x x        X670V-48x             x x&lt;BR /&gt;
-------------------------------    -------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;
      3:10 3:11                              3:10 3:11&lt;BR /&gt;
         |        |                                      |       |&lt;BR /&gt;
        2x10G                                     2x10G&lt;BR /&gt;
        |       |                                    |      |&lt;BR /&gt;
       FW1_1                                 FW1_2&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Suppose 3rd switch X670V-48x in the SW stack 1 leaves the Stack, while having its port 3:10 and 3:11 always Up. &lt;BR /&gt;
FW1_1 will stay Active.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Is there a way to disable ports 3:10 and 3:11 is that condition, e.g. when switch 3 leaves Stack ? &lt;BR /&gt;
This will force FW1_2 to become active via the other Stack.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks, and kind regards,&lt;BR /&gt;
Estelle Sonnic&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2018 18:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Sonnic</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-07-06T18:54:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Switch leaving a Stack with ports Up</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/switch-leaving-a-stack-with-ports-up/m-p/12182#M3210</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
We have two stacks, each is made with 2 X670V-48t and 1 X670V-48x.&lt;BR /&gt;
Stacking has been done using alternate ports 47 and 48.&lt;BR /&gt;
Therefore 10G ports 45 and 49 on X670V-48t cannot be used.&lt;BR /&gt;
No VIM.&lt;BR /&gt;
Ports 45 to 48 are put as x in figure below:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
We need to set-up a uplink 2x10G LAG between each stacked swith (SW stack1 and SW stack2) and a Juniper FW Cluster (FW1_1 and FW1_2).&lt;BR /&gt;
In figure below, FW1_1 is Active while FW1_2 is Standby.&lt;BR /&gt;
As no VIM module available on X670V-48t, the only way to do this is to establish this LAG between X670V-48x &lt;BR /&gt;
and FW:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
SW stack1                        SW stack2&lt;BR /&gt;
-------------------------------    -------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;
                                 x x                                      x x&lt;BR /&gt;
 X670V-48t            x x       X670V-48t              x x&lt;BR /&gt;
-------------------------------    -------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;
                                 x x  &lt;BR /&gt;
 X670V-48t            x x       X670V-48t              x x&lt;BR /&gt;
-------------------------------    -------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;
                                 x x                                      x x&lt;BR /&gt;
 X670V-48x           x x        X670V-48x             x x&lt;BR /&gt;
-------------------------------    -------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;
      3:10 3:11                              3:10 3:11&lt;BR /&gt;
         |        |                                      |       |&lt;BR /&gt;
        2x10G                                     2x10G&lt;BR /&gt;
        |       |                                    |      |&lt;BR /&gt;
       FW1_1                                 FW1_2&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Suppose 3rd switch X670V-48x in the SW stack 1 leaves the Stack, while having its port 3:10 and 3:11 always Up. &lt;BR /&gt;
FW1_1 will stay Active.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Is there a way to disable ports 3:10 and 3:11 is that condition, e.g. when switch 3 leaves Stack ? &lt;BR /&gt;
This will force FW1_2 to become active via the other Stack.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks, and kind regards,&lt;BR /&gt;
Estelle Sonnic&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2018 18:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/switch-leaving-a-stack-with-ports-up/m-p/12182#M3210</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sonnic</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-06T18:54:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

