<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic RE: Switch stack uplinks to network in ExtremeSwitching (Other)</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/switch-stack-uplinks-to-network/m-p/12221#M3249</link>
    <description>That's what I thought, I just didn't know if it was beneficial to have them on the master and backup. Thank you for your help.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2017 21:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DH1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-11-08T21:53:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Switch stack uplinks to network</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/switch-stack-uplinks-to-network/m-p/12219#M3247</link>
      <description>I have a stack of 5 X440-48p G2 switches. I want to have a LAG uplink to the network and am wondering if the 2 ports should be on the master and backup? I configured port 1:48 &amp;amp; 5:48 in the LAG but node 5 is just a standby node. Should I fix the LAG so it is ports 1:48 (master) &amp;amp; 2:48 (backup) or does it not matter? &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2017 21:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/switch-stack-uplinks-to-network/m-p/12219#M3247</guid>
      <dc:creator>DH1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-08T21:07:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Switch stack uplinks to network</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/switch-stack-uplinks-to-network/m-p/12220#M3248</link>
      <description>Hi, That does not matter. Any port of any node can participate in a LAG&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2017 21:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/switch-stack-uplinks-to-network/m-p/12220#M3248</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ron_Huygens</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-08T21:38:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Switch stack uplinks to network</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/switch-stack-uplinks-to-network/m-p/12221#M3249</link>
      <description>That's what I thought, I just didn't know if it was beneficial to have them on the master and backup. Thank you for your help.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2017 21:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/switch-stack-uplinks-to-network/m-p/12221#M3249</guid>
      <dc:creator>DH1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-08T21:53:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Switch stack uplinks to network</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/switch-stack-uplinks-to-network/m-p/12222#M3250</link>
      <description>The master/backup roles protect the stack itself and as long as the primary/secondary ports of your LAG are in different switches in the stack, you'll be protected.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2017 22:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/switch-stack-uplinks-to-network/m-p/12222#M3250</guid>
      <dc:creator>Eric_Burke</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-08T22:53:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

