<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic link aggregation, two links, two streams, yet only single bandwidth in ExtremeSwitching (Other)</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/link-aggregation-two-links-two-streams-yet-only-single-bandwidth/m-p/9302#M330</link>
    <description>The setup is simple:&lt;BR /&gt;
There's a backup server using HP Teaming software to form a LAG of two gigabit copper ports with a 7100 using LACP.&lt;BR /&gt;
Establishment of the lag works fine and the aggregate bandwidth is shown correctly as 2Gbps.&lt;BR /&gt;
Now I know what a single stream only flows over one link, meaning link aggregation won't help to get more than 1Gbps with a single session.&lt;BR /&gt;
That's why I tried to backup two machines simultaneously.&lt;BR /&gt;
The outputalgorithm is set to dip-sip.&lt;BR /&gt;
Yet there is only one link used. The second link remains idle.&lt;BR /&gt;
(The clients are not connected to the same switch than the backupserver but they are all in the same VLAN.)&lt;BR /&gt;
Why is the backup load not shared between both links in this case?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
-&amp;gt;show port lacp port ge.2.3-4 status summ&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Global Link Aggregation state : enabled&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Port       Aggr           Actor System               Partner System&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
                         Pri:   System ID:  Key:    Pri:   System ID:  Key:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
ge.2.3         lag.0.1 [(32768,20b399cc6c46,  102),(    0,e4115ba8ebc2,  768)]&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
ge.2.4         lag.0.1 [(32768,20b399cc6c46,  102),(    0,e4115ba8ebc2,  768)]&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2014 18:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jeronimo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-09-27T18:56:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>link aggregation, two links, two streams, yet only single bandwidth</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/link-aggregation-two-links-two-streams-yet-only-single-bandwidth/m-p/9302#M330</link>
      <description>The setup is simple:&lt;BR /&gt;
There's a backup server using HP Teaming software to form a LAG of two gigabit copper ports with a 7100 using LACP.&lt;BR /&gt;
Establishment of the lag works fine and the aggregate bandwidth is shown correctly as 2Gbps.&lt;BR /&gt;
Now I know what a single stream only flows over one link, meaning link aggregation won't help to get more than 1Gbps with a single session.&lt;BR /&gt;
That's why I tried to backup two machines simultaneously.&lt;BR /&gt;
The outputalgorithm is set to dip-sip.&lt;BR /&gt;
Yet there is only one link used. The second link remains idle.&lt;BR /&gt;
(The clients are not connected to the same switch than the backupserver but they are all in the same VLAN.)&lt;BR /&gt;
Why is the backup load not shared between both links in this case?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
-&amp;gt;show port lacp port ge.2.3-4 status summ&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Global Link Aggregation state : enabled&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Port       Aggr           Actor System               Partner System&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
                         Pri:   System ID:  Key:    Pri:   System ID:  Key:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
ge.2.3         lag.0.1 [(32768,20b399cc6c46,  102),(    0,e4115ba8ebc2,  768)]&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
ge.2.4         lag.0.1 [(32768,20b399cc6c46,  102),(    0,e4115ba8ebc2,  768)]&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2014 18:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/link-aggregation-two-links-two-streams-yet-only-single-bandwidth/m-p/9302#M330</guid>
      <dc:creator>jeronimo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-09-27T18:56:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: link aggregation, two links, two streams, yet only single bandwidth</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/link-aggregation-two-links-two-streams-yet-only-single-bandwidth/m-p/9303#M331</link>
      <description>LACP selects the link for a flow based on a hashing algorithm. If the result for both flows is the same, the same link will be used. There is no such thing as intelligent load sharing with L2 aggregation.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2014 12:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/link-aggregation-two-links-two-streams-yet-only-single-bandwidth/m-p/9303#M331</guid>
      <dc:creator>rbrt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-09-29T12:52:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

