<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ERS SPBM Limitations in ExtremeSwitching (Other)</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/ers-spbm-limitations/m-p/84633#M3935</link>
    <description>An older matrix shows that the 4800 models can't be a BCB in an SPBM environment. Is that the case for the ERS4900? From what I can tell, it does work as a BCB.</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2022 23:08:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bfaltys</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-04-05T23:08:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ERS SPBM Limitations</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/ers-spbm-limitations/m-p/84633#M3935</link>
      <description>An older matrix shows that the 4800 models can't be a BCB in an SPBM environment. Is that the case for the ERS4900? From what I can tell, it does work as a BCB.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2022 23:08:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/ers-spbm-limitations/m-p/84633#M3935</guid>
      <dc:creator>bfaltys</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-04-05T23:08:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ERS SPBM Limitations</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/ers-spbm-limitations/m-p/84634#M3936</link>
      <description>ERS4900 and ERS5900 both have BCB support (NNI to NNI forwarding)</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2022 16:33:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/ers-spbm-limitations/m-p/84634#M3936</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ludovico_Steven</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-04-06T16:33:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ERS SPBM Limitations</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/ers-spbm-limitations/m-p/84635#M3937</link>
      <description>Thanks. Just for my own knowledge, does ERS4800 not have NNI-&amp;gt;NNI support?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2022 16:47:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/ers-spbm-limitations/m-p/84635#M3937</guid>
      <dc:creator>bfaltys</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-04-06T16:47:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ERS SPBM Limitations</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/ers-spbm-limitations/m-p/84636#M3938</link>
      <description>No, the ERS4800 never had NNI-NNI forwarding support. So it always activates ISIS Overload as well, which basically prevent the SPB node from even being considered as transit on paths to other destinations.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2022 18:52:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/ers-spbm-limitations/m-p/84636#M3938</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ludovico_Steven</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-04-06T18:52:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

