<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic RE: Module on Matrix X 16 CPU load 100% in ExtremeSwitching (Other)</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/module-on-matrix-x-16-cpu-load-100/m-p/9765#M793</link>
    <description>I would recommend you to open a TAC case for this and if exists please attache the core dump file(s).&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 17:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rainer_Adam</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-05-26T17:19:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Module on Matrix X 16 CPU load 100%</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/module-on-matrix-x-16-cpu-load-100/m-p/9760#M788</link>
      <description>Hello guys,&lt;BR /&gt;
We have a Matrix X 16-slot. On one of the modules we received the following messages:&lt;BR /&gt;
WARNING: CPU utilization (100.0%) has exceeded the monitored threshold limit (80.0%)&lt;BR /&gt;
After that all the ports on the module stopped working. &lt;BR /&gt;
The module is 8 Port XFP GBIC 10 Gigabit Ethernet. After the module was reseated the problem was gone. &lt;BR /&gt;
These were the processes on the module&lt;BR /&gt;
Name              ProcID   15 Sec    1 min     5 min&lt;BR /&gt;
     domainlink       7     0.26     0.28      0.25&lt;BR /&gt;
                 dlm      10   131.80   131.71    132.85&lt;BR /&gt;
                 ess      13    41.60    35.60     20.61&lt;BR /&gt;
         fabmIom      14     6.20     6.38      6.18&lt;BR /&gt;
                 fem      15    14.13    16.08     17.56&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I could not find any information about these processes. Has anyone seen this problem or should i open GTAC case&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 16:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/module-on-matrix-x-16-cpu-load-100/m-p/9760#M788</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tsenislav_Nakov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-26T16:22:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Module on Matrix X 16 CPU load 100%</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/module-on-matrix-x-16-cpu-load-100/m-p/9761#M789</link>
      <description>Do you use CA-Spectrum maybe for polling the devices? In a number of cases the last 15 years of my business Spectrum makes such an issue or was the major reason for it (reboot's of E1 switches for example).&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 16:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/module-on-matrix-x-16-cpu-load-100/m-p/9761#M789</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rainer_Adam</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-26T16:25:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Module on Matrix X 16 CPU load 100%</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/module-on-matrix-x-16-cpu-load-100/m-p/9762#M790</link>
      <description>Hello Adam,&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks for the quick reply. CA-Spectrum is used. Is it possible that only one module got 100% CPU utilization in this case&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 17:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/module-on-matrix-x-16-cpu-load-100/m-p/9762#M790</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tsenislav_Nakov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-26T17:08:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Module on Matrix X 16 CPU load 100%</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/module-on-matrix-x-16-cpu-load-100/m-p/9763#M791</link>
      <description>What version do you use on your X-Series? There exists also a 497 days issue with release 2.0.2.0 or 2.0.2.1 with a known spanningtree issue.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 17:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/module-on-matrix-x-16-cpu-load-100/m-p/9763#M791</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rainer_Adam</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-26T17:12:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Module on Matrix X 16 CPU load 100%</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/module-on-matrix-x-16-cpu-load-100/m-p/9764#M792</link>
      <description>The version is 2.0.3.0&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 17:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/module-on-matrix-x-16-cpu-load-100/m-p/9764#M792</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tsenislav_Nakov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-26T17:13:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Module on Matrix X 16 CPU load 100%</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/module-on-matrix-x-16-cpu-load-100/m-p/9765#M793</link>
      <description>I would recommend you to open a TAC case for this and if exists please attache the core dump file(s).&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 17:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-other/module-on-matrix-x-16-cpu-load-100/m-p/9765#M793</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rainer_Adam</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-26T17:19:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

