<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Unconfigured I-SID gets discovered by switch in ExtremeSwitching (VSP/Fabric Engine)</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-vsp-fabric/unconfigured-i-sid-gets-discovered-by-switch/m-p/111509#M2587</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi bar,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks for the quick response :). So does the switch simply discover every i-sid in an area?, because that is not the case. It discovers all its locally configured i-sids and some random i-sids that aren't confiugured.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2024 09:02:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>stefanhue</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-08-19T09:02:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Unconfigured I-SID gets discovered by switch</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-vsp-fabric/unconfigured-i-sid-gets-discovered-by-switch/m-p/111238#M2583</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;im a bit confused. I always thought that an isis member only discoveres members with the same i-sids that are configured on a switch. For e.g&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Switch A: 1066,4042,5000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Switch B: 1066&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Switch C: 5000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If i log in to switch B and do a "show isis spbm i-sid discover", I would think that I would only get "switch A" which also has i-sid 1066 configured, but for some reason the "discovery" returns 1066, 4024 and 5000 from "switch A" and i-sid 5000 from "switch C". This is really confusing. The i-sids i mentioned are just examples. "Switch B" also does not discover just every i-sid in our fabric and "switch B" is not the only one with this behavior. Also there are no FA devices connected to the switch. We are just doing basic c-vlans that are linked to i-sids in our fabric.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope i explained it in a way that is understandable ^^Thanks in advance !&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2024 19:45:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-vsp-fabric/unconfigured-i-sid-gets-discovered-by-switch/m-p/111238#M2583</guid>
      <dc:creator>stefanhue</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-17T19:45:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unconfigured I-SID gets discovered by switch</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-vsp-fabric/unconfigured-i-sid-gets-discovered-by-switch/m-p/111508#M2586</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi stefanhue,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;all your switches in your network in the same area need to discover and be aware of each other to learn a view of the network.&amp;nbsp; If you only want to see switches with the same i-sid configured try the command&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;show isis spbm i-sid disc id 1066&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2024 07:39:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-vsp-fabric/unconfigured-i-sid-gets-discovered-by-switch/m-p/111508#M2586</guid>
      <dc:creator>bar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-19T07:39:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unconfigured I-SID gets discovered by switch</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-vsp-fabric/unconfigured-i-sid-gets-discovered-by-switch/m-p/111509#M2587</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi bar,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks for the quick response :). So does the switch simply discover every i-sid in an area?, because that is not the case. It discovers all its locally configured i-sids and some random i-sids that aren't confiugured.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2024 09:02:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-vsp-fabric/unconfigured-i-sid-gets-discovered-by-switch/m-p/111509#M2587</guid>
      <dc:creator>stefanhue</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-19T09:02:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unconfigured I-SID gets discovered by switch</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-vsp-fabric/unconfigured-i-sid-gets-discovered-by-switch/m-p/111520#M2588</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sorry stefanhue,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;just re-read your question.&amp;nbsp; I think your understanding is correct.&amp;nbsp; I wouldn't expect switch B in your example to see switch C, nor i-sids 4042 or 5000 from switch A.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sorry though, I can't come up with a reason that it would&amp;nbsp;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":confused_face:"&gt;😕&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:31:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremeswitching-vsp-fabric/unconfigured-i-sid-gets-discovered-by-switch/m-p/111520#M2588</guid>
      <dc:creator>bar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-19T16:31:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

