<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic c25 controller .pfe extension and assume that this software will perform the same on a 5210 controller with an .rue extension in ExtremeWireless (Identifi)</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/c25-controller-pfe-extension-and-assume-that-this-software-will/m-p/36288#M1771</link>
    <description>Wireless controller : &lt;BR /&gt;
Is it a valid test to load software on a c25 controller .pfe extension and assume that this software will perform the same on a 5210 controller with an .rue extension&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
We have a customer that now wants to run all new software releases on a test network, before moving to a live enviroment . Currently they have a 2 x 5210 controllers Live, they are wanting to purchase a smaller controller possible c25 ( maybe 2 as the main units are HA ) load software and we also have a specific .php file .&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
My immediate reaction to this would be that this is not a valid test , though to be honest I have only upgraded two of these units ( 5210 in the past )&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I look forward to your comments &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I have also raised this as a TAC case.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 18:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rod_Robertson2</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-01-04T18:33:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>c25 controller .pfe extension and assume that this software will perform the same on a 5210 controller with an .rue extension</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/c25-controller-pfe-extension-and-assume-that-this-software-will/m-p/36288#M1771</link>
      <description>Wireless controller : &lt;BR /&gt;
Is it a valid test to load software on a c25 controller .pfe extension and assume that this software will perform the same on a 5210 controller with an .rue extension&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
We have a customer that now wants to run all new software releases on a test network, before moving to a live enviroment . Currently they have a 2 x 5210 controllers Live, they are wanting to purchase a smaller controller possible c25 ( maybe 2 as the main units are HA ) load software and we also have a specific .php file .&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
My immediate reaction to this would be that this is not a valid test , though to be honest I have only upgraded two of these units ( 5210 in the past )&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I look forward to your comments &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I have also raised this as a TAC case.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 18:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/c25-controller-pfe-extension-and-assume-that-this-software-will/m-p/36288#M1771</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rod_Robertson2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-04T18:33:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: c25 controller .pfe extension and assume that this software will perform the same on a 5210 controller with an .rue extension</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/c25-controller-pfe-extension-and-assume-that-this-software-will/m-p/36289#M1772</link>
      <description>Rod, &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
A C25 image will never work for a C5210 and vice versa.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 19:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/c25-controller-pfe-extension-and-assume-that-this-software-will/m-p/36289#M1772</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jacob__Praveen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-04T19:44:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: c25 controller .pfe extension and assume that this software will perform the same on a 5210 controller with an .rue extension</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/c25-controller-pfe-extension-and-assume-that-this-software-will/m-p/36290#M1773</link>
      <description>Jacob , thanks for the reply .&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I understand that , what I am after is if I load a version of code on the c25 ( .pfe extension ) and it all performs as expect .. ( test enviroment ) can I then load the correct verion of code on a c5210 HA with a .rue extension  ( live network ) and expect it to operate as the test unit .. or to make sure there are no issues or bugs between the 2 versions  do I need a c5210 in the test enviroment , to replicate .&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
So the question is , is the basic software and bugs the same for the c25 and the c5210 other than AP capacity .. oh ! and HA..</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 19:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/c25-controller-pfe-extension-and-assume-that-this-software-will/m-p/36290#M1773</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rod_Robertson2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-04T19:44:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: c25 controller .pfe extension and assume that this software will perform the same on a 5210 controller with an .rue extension</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/c25-controller-pfe-extension-and-assume-that-this-software-will/m-p/36291#M1774</link>
      <description>Rod&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The firmware itself is the same although the actual image varies between hardware platforms.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The tests will have to take into account the difference in hardware capabilities, number of supported AP's/users etc.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
-Gareth&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 19:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/c25-controller-pfe-extension-and-assume-that-this-software-will/m-p/36291#M1774</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gareth_Mitchell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-04T19:50:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: c25 controller .pfe extension and assume that this software will perform the same on a 5210 controller with an .rue extension</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/c25-controller-pfe-extension-and-assume-that-this-software-will/m-p/36292#M1775</link>
      <description>Yes, you'd do that to test the features.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
But I'd advice to either buy a C35 (same price as C25) or if the customer has the infrastructure to deploy V2110s.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
-Ron</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 19:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/c25-controller-pfe-extension-and-assume-that-this-software-will/m-p/36292#M1775</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ronald_Dvorak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-04T19:50:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: c25 controller .pfe extension and assume that this software will perform the same on a 5210 controller with an .rue extension</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/c25-controller-pfe-extension-and-assume-that-this-software-will/m-p/36293#M1776</link>
      <description>Ron&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I will probably go for a C35 as suggested , the customer would not see a virtual machine as a like for like test ..&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 19:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/c25-controller-pfe-extension-and-assume-that-this-software-will/m-p/36293#M1776</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rod_Robertson2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-04T19:50:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

