<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic RE: MAC to IP resolution between Wireless Controller and NAC in ExtremeWireless (Identifi)</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/mac-to-ip-resolution-between-wireless-controller-and-nac/m-p/30395#M455</link>
    <description>&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
That really helped me recently, thanks!&lt;BR /&gt;
I believe those station events could be directly mentioned in that GTAC article with XML type events.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Kind regards,&lt;BR /&gt;
Tomasz</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2019 23:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Tomasz</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-05-08T23:21:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MAC to IP resolution between Wireless Controller and NAC</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/mac-to-ip-resolution-between-wireless-controller-and-nac/m-p/30381#M441</link>
      <description>We are having trouble with guests completing the captive portal registration on the NAC.  This is apparently a MAC-to-IP resolution issue between the EWC and the NAC.  The subnet for the captive portal is 10.200.x.x and the DHCP is handled by the EWC's onboard DHCP for the topology.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I doing something wrong because the NAC is not resolving these addresses therfor they connot complete registration.  The information from the switches resolves perfectly but not from this "guest" subnet.  I am sure there is a check box somewhere I am missing, any help?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 18:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/mac-to-ip-resolution-between-wireless-controller-and-nac/m-p/30381#M441</guid>
      <dc:creator>Joshua_Beddingf</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-28T18:21:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: MAC to IP resolution between Wireless Controller and NAC</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/mac-to-ip-resolution-between-wireless-controller-and-nac/m-p/30382#M442</link>
      <description>Is that a bridge@controller topology = the clients get a IP in the same subnet as the NAC portal ?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The unregistered role should look something like this....&lt;BR /&gt;
allow DHCP, DNS, http and https to the portal, ARP, return dircetion and deny the rest.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P class="fancybox-image"&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="68c302bc8fca4c7da04b437ed482caea_RackMultipart20170828-4395-1pmq6l1-EWC_guest_role_inline.png"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/2934i897CF7DF283F1F23/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="68c302bc8fca4c7da04b437ed482caea_RackMultipart20170828-4395-1pmq6l1-EWC_guest_role_inline.png" alt="68c302bc8fca4c7da04b437ed482caea_RackMultipart20170828-4395-1pmq6l1-EWC_guest_role_inline.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Also check that...&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="https://gtacknowledge.extremenetworks.com/articles/Q_A/Why-the-redirection-to-portal-page-failed-for-ExtremeWireless-v10-11-and-later-release" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener"&gt;https://gtacknowledge.extremenetworks.com/articles/Q_A/Why-the-redirection-to-portal-page-failed-for...&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Is MAC auth also enabled ?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P class="fancybox-image"&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="68c302bc8fca4c7da04b437ed482caea_RackMultipart20170828-110689-15sce1k-EWC_ECP_wlan_service_inline.png"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/2956iD1418F489E85A0D6/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="68c302bc8fca4c7da04b437ed482caea_RackMultipart20170828-110689-15sce1k-EWC_ECP_wlan_service_inline.png" alt="68c302bc8fca4c7da04b437ed482caea_RackMultipart20170828-110689-15sce1k-EWC_ECP_wlan_service_inline.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Cheers,&lt;BR /&gt;
Ron</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 19:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/mac-to-ip-resolution-between-wireless-controller-and-nac/m-p/30382#M442</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ronald_Dvorak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-28T19:02:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: MAC to IP resolution between Wireless Controller and NAC</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/mac-to-ip-resolution-between-wireless-controller-and-nac/m-p/30383#M443</link>
      <description>The NAC portal is not in the same subnet - because there are two controllers each with a B@EWC topology - therefor two guest topology subnets.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I made two changes and am currently testing.  I checked "Enable RADIUS Accounting" and added the NACs into the field.  I also unchecked "Collect Accounting Information of Wireless Controller".  The other screenshots showed no changes needed.  This last screenshot did have some differences.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I am not seeing an increase in success for MAC-to-IP but the first device I tested for captive portal registration succeeded.  I am doing more testing now.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 19:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/mac-to-ip-resolution-between-wireless-controller-and-nac/m-p/30383#M443</guid>
      <dc:creator>Joshua_Beddingf</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-28T19:31:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: MAC to IP resolution between Wireless Controller and NAC</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/mac-to-ip-resolution-between-wireless-controller-and-nac/m-p/30384#M444</link>
      <description>You'd set the NAC IP in the controller so DHCP information is provided to the NAC.&lt;BR /&gt;
GUI &amp;gt; VNS &amp;gt; global &amp;gt; NAC integration&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 20:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/mac-to-ip-resolution-between-wireless-controller-and-nac/m-p/30384#M444</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ronald_Dvorak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-28T20:17:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: MAC to IP resolution between Wireless Controller and NAC</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/mac-to-ip-resolution-between-wireless-controller-and-nac/m-p/30385#M445</link>
      <description>The NAC Integration was already configured.  Thanks.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 21:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/mac-to-ip-resolution-between-wireless-controller-and-nac/m-p/30385#M445</guid>
      <dc:creator>Joshua_Beddingf</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-28T21:07:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: MAC to IP resolution between Wireless Controller and NAC</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/mac-to-ip-resolution-between-wireless-controller-and-nac/m-p/30386#M446</link>
      <description>If I unterstand that correctly you can't ping the guest client from the NAC - correct ?&lt;BR /&gt;
If that is that case - have you configured a IP route on the NAC to reach the guest subnet.&lt;BR /&gt;
Do you use the main interface on the NAC for the guest auth or did you enabled the 2nd NIC for it.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 21:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/mac-to-ip-resolution-between-wireless-controller-and-nac/m-p/30386#M446</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ronald_Dvorak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-28T21:24:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: MAC to IP resolution between Wireless Controller and NAC</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/mac-to-ip-resolution-between-wireless-controller-and-nac/m-p/30387#M447</link>
      <description>"If I unterstand that correctly you can't ping the guest client from the NAC - correct ?"&lt;BR /&gt;
Not sure what I said that led you to think this.  I can ping clients from the NAC.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
"Do you use the main interface on the NAC for the guest auth"&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Yes.  We use the main interface.  Would using a secondary interface improve performance?&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 21:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/mac-to-ip-resolution-between-wireless-controller-and-nac/m-p/30387#M447</guid>
      <dc:creator>Joshua_Beddingf</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-28T21:38:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: MAC to IP resolution between Wireless Controller and NAC</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/mac-to-ip-resolution-between-wireless-controller-and-nac/m-p/30388#M448</link>
      <description>Are you bridging at controller? It would help if you put a ip-helper or bootprelay to a NAC gateway on the router to your guest VLAN. Also, did you configure SNMPv3 between Netsight and the EWC?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 22:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/mac-to-ip-resolution-between-wireless-controller-and-nac/m-p/30388#M448</guid>
      <dc:creator>Matthew_Hum</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-28T22:22:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: MAC to IP resolution between Wireless Controller and NAC</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/mac-to-ip-resolution-between-wireless-controller-and-nac/m-p/30389#M449</link>
      <description>&lt;P class="fancybox-image"&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="4f4f484bd632440eaca2490725952e5b_RackMultipart20170828-86930-y0g6ox-Capture_inline.png"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/1342iFA88ADA73F5AA696/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="4f4f484bd632440eaca2490725952e5b_RackMultipart20170828-86930-y0g6ox-Capture_inline.png" alt="4f4f484bd632440eaca2490725952e5b_RackMultipart20170828-86930-y0g6ox-Capture_inline.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The local DHCP server in the EWC is providing IP Adresses.  Would the ip-helper still be useful?  I assume the NAC would be "sniffing" dhcp traffic.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 22:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/mac-to-ip-resolution-between-wireless-controller-and-nac/m-p/30389#M449</guid>
      <dc:creator>Joshua_Beddingf</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-28T22:22:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: MAC to IP resolution between Wireless Controller and NAC</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/mac-to-ip-resolution-between-wireless-controller-and-nac/m-p/30390#M450</link>
      <description>The EWC should be sending it over, but an additional ip-helper wouldn't hurt.&lt;BR /&gt;
Please verify SNMPv3.&lt;BR /&gt;
you can further check the logs on NAC to identify why IP-to-MAC resolution is failing.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 22:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/mac-to-ip-resolution-between-wireless-controller-and-nac/m-p/30390#M450</guid>
      <dc:creator>Matthew_Hum</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-28T22:22:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: MAC to IP resolution between Wireless Controller and NAC</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/mac-to-ip-resolution-between-wireless-controller-and-nac/m-p/30391#M451</link>
      <description>SNMPv3 is configured and working.  I will check the logs</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 22:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/mac-to-ip-resolution-between-wireless-controller-and-nac/m-p/30391#M451</guid>
      <dc:creator>Joshua_Beddingf</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-28T22:22:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: MAC to IP resolution between Wireless Controller and NAC</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/mac-to-ip-resolution-between-wireless-controller-and-nac/m-p/30392#M452</link>
      <description>As you mentioned that NAC portal is not in same subnet, I think the ip-helper or bootp relay configuration would be need in core switch so that the NAC could get the DHCP packets for MAC-to-IP resolution.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 22:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/mac-to-ip-resolution-between-wireless-controller-and-nac/m-p/30392#M452</guid>
      <dc:creator>David_Choi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-28T22:22:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: MAC to IP resolution between Wireless Controller and NAC</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/mac-to-ip-resolution-between-wireless-controller-and-nac/m-p/30394#M454</link>
      <description>My Mac-to-IP seems to be much better.  I have changed a few check boxes and added the helper-ip addresses.  NAC registration is still spotty.  GTAC said this was due to MAC-to-IP but having improved MAC-to-IP I am not seeing any better performance.  Before a client would log in "Extended State" "Resolving IP Address".  Now it logs "IdentiFi State Change" but the client end-user sees the same thing - A registration screen that just spins and then times out.  If you let it sit long enough you get the AUP screen and can finalize registration (which is just a check box to submit the AUP).</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 19:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/mac-to-ip-resolution-between-wireless-controller-and-nac/m-p/30394#M454</guid>
      <dc:creator>Joshua_Beddingf</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-30T19:28:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: MAC to IP resolution between Wireless Controller and NAC</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/mac-to-ip-resolution-between-wireless-controller-and-nac/m-p/30395#M455</link>
      <description>&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
That really helped me recently, thanks!&lt;BR /&gt;
I believe those station events could be directly mentioned in that GTAC article with XML type events.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Kind regards,&lt;BR /&gt;
Tomasz</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2019 23:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/mac-to-ip-resolution-between-wireless-controller-and-nac/m-p/30395#M455</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tomasz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-08T23:21:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

