<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic RE: WDS Link Expected TX/RX rate in ExtremeWireless (Identifi)</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/wds-link-expected-tx-rx-rate/m-p/54004#M6075</link>
    <description>OK, I understand. &lt;BR /&gt;
You mean the rate the radios negotiate during establishing a connection.&lt;BR /&gt;
This static parameter does not describe the real bandwidth on the connection.&lt;BR /&gt;
The internal antennas on 3965i are 360 degrees and prepared for site coverage. If you need 2/4 streams in one direction, you need a directed antenna for that. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Example:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://www.mars-antennas.com/ma-wa57-qp4mimo19" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener"&gt;http://www.mars-antennas.com/ma-wa57-qp4mimo19&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
(19°, 4 Streams 45° MIMO)&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
So check the real bandwidth wir iperf. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
br&lt;BR /&gt;
Volker</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2017 12:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Volker_Kull</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-08-16T12:46:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>WDS Link Expected TX/RX rate</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/wds-link-expected-tx-rx-rate/m-p/53995#M6066</link>
      <description>Hello, &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I have a WDS Wireless Link with 2 AP 3965i-ROW between to building with a distance of 30 Meters.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Setup: Last Firmware V10.31.04.0009&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
           Using 802.3at PoE&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
           Agregation Lan1 and Lan2 &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
           Channel 104 : (5500 , [5520], 5540, 5560)&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Output:   Rx Rss    -58&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
What is the Expected TX/RX rate in this case ? &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="https://cloud.kapostcontent.net/pub/7dc1aa5b-da46-4460-a96b-f52e3a7dd0a0/ap-3965-data-sheet.pdf?kui=HJxlaS40Ky2JwKmzdnEXZg" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener"&gt;https://cloud.kapostcontent.net/pub/7dc1aa5b-da46-4460-a96b-f52e3a7dd0a0/ap-3965-data-sheet.pdf?kui=...&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 13:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/wds-link-expected-tx-rx-rate/m-p/53995#M6066</guid>
      <dc:creator>Valter_Veiga</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-11T13:27:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: WDS Link Expected TX/RX rate</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/wds-link-expected-tx-rx-rate/m-p/53996#M6067</link>
      <description>On the field without refections and without dedicated antennas (YAGI or sector) you will get not more than 80-100 MBit/s because of using only one stream. I have connections with sector antenna 60° horizontal/vertical 2 streams with 150-200MBit/s on 50m distance.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
br&lt;BR /&gt;
Volker</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 13:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/wds-link-expected-tx-rx-rate/m-p/53996#M6067</guid>
      <dc:creator>Volker_Kull</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-11T13:34:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: WDS Link Expected TX/RX rate</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/wds-link-expected-tx-rx-rate/m-p/53997#M6068</link>
      <description>Could you please post the screenshot from the GUI &amp;gt; Reports &amp;gt; AP &amp;gt; Mesh Statistics.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
And what is the problem ?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 13:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/wds-link-expected-tx-rx-rate/m-p/53997#M6068</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ronald_Dvorak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-11T13:41:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: WDS Link Expected TX/RX rate</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/wds-link-expected-tx-rx-rate/m-p/53998#M6069</link>
      <description>Hello, &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
This is a 3965i, the antenas are integrated  4x4:4, I think is using 4 Stream .....&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Volker, the real TX/RX is higher.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P class="fancybox-image"&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="fc28dfa0b14d4d0887e910f24b9abf28_RackMultipart20170811-47306-ulc8y-Mesh_Statistics_inline.png"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/4392i6AECF1C780B8D970/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="fc28dfa0b14d4d0887e910f24b9abf28_RackMultipart20170811-47306-ulc8y-Mesh_Statistics_inline.png" alt="fc28dfa0b14d4d0887e910f24b9abf28_RackMultipart20170811-47306-ulc8y-Mesh_Statistics_inline.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 14:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/wds-link-expected-tx-rx-rate/m-p/53998#M6069</guid>
      <dc:creator>Valter_Veiga</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-11T14:11:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: WDS Link Expected TX/RX rate</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/wds-link-expected-tx-rx-rate/m-p/53999#M6070</link>
      <description>what's the value in rx/tx rate ?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 14:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/wds-link-expected-tx-rx-rate/m-p/53999#M6070</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ronald_Dvorak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-11T14:11:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: WDS Link Expected TX/RX rate</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/wds-link-expected-tx-rx-rate/m-p/54000#M6071</link>
      <description>780/780</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 14:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/wds-link-expected-tx-rx-rate/m-p/54000#M6071</guid>
      <dc:creator>Valter_Veiga</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-11T14:11:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: WDS Link Expected TX/RX rate</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/wds-link-expected-tx-rx-rate/m-p/54001#M6072</link>
      <description>So what is the real bandwidth you have ? What do you expect ? do you have a problem ? More info is required ! &lt;BR /&gt;
If you use a 4x4 AP with integrated antennas without reflections or dedicated antennas you will not have 4 streams p2p active.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
br&lt;BR /&gt;
Volker</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 14:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/wds-link-expected-tx-rx-rate/m-p/54001#M6072</guid>
      <dc:creator>Volker_Kull</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-11T14:15:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: WDS Link Expected TX/RX rate</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/wds-link-expected-tx-rx-rate/m-p/54002#M6073</link>
      <description>Why Not 4 streams in WDS Link?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
In the datasheet you have, Data Rates MCS0 to MSC9 with Data Streams 1 to 4 and Channel HT20, HT40, HT80.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
In the Data Sheet, Maximum Throughput 5GHz Radio 1.732 Gbps and Number of spatial streams 4.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Then you have the Receiver Sensibility. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The picture I send, you have the Rx Rss of -58.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
What should be the teorical value of RX/TX ?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
In the controller, were can I see the MCS negociated?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
      &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
      &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
VVeiga&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2017 20:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/wds-link-expected-tx-rx-rate/m-p/54002#M6073</guid>
      <dc:creator>Valter_Veiga</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-15T20:03:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: WDS Link Expected TX/RX rate</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/wds-link-expected-tx-rx-rate/m-p/54003#M6074</link>
      <description>I have run a Lab with this with 2 AP 3965i-ROW , with 5 meters distance.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The  RX TX 1560/780 see new upload file.&lt;BR /&gt;
1560 Means that I has using the PoE 802.3at with 4 Data Streams, and the 780 I was using the PoE 802.3af with 2 Data Streams. Look at Page DataSheet page 7, in normal GI.  The Rx Rss was -28&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P class="fancybox-image"&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="f2bf38c9da15498fafb36f8223523bb3_RackMultipart20170815-59948-xmga2n-Mesh_Statistics_Lab___inline.png"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/5454i66D8EB1A9D9BE352/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="f2bf38c9da15498fafb36f8223523bb3_RackMultipart20170815-59948-xmga2n-Mesh_Statistics_Lab___inline.png" alt="f2bf38c9da15498fafb36f8223523bb3_RackMultipart20170815-59948-xmga2n-Mesh_Statistics_Lab___inline.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/wds-link-expected-tx-rx-rate/m-p/54003#M6074</guid>
      <dc:creator>Valter_Veiga</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-16T00:02:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: WDS Link Expected TX/RX rate</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/wds-link-expected-tx-rx-rate/m-p/54004#M6075</link>
      <description>OK, I understand. &lt;BR /&gt;
You mean the rate the radios negotiate during establishing a connection.&lt;BR /&gt;
This static parameter does not describe the real bandwidth on the connection.&lt;BR /&gt;
The internal antennas on 3965i are 360 degrees and prepared for site coverage. If you need 2/4 streams in one direction, you need a directed antenna for that. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Example:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://www.mars-antennas.com/ma-wa57-qp4mimo19" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener"&gt;http://www.mars-antennas.com/ma-wa57-qp4mimo19&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
(19°, 4 Streams 45° MIMO)&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
So check the real bandwidth wir iperf. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
br&lt;BR /&gt;
Volker</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2017 12:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/wds-link-expected-tx-rx-rate/m-p/54004#M6075</guid>
      <dc:creator>Volker_Kull</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-16T12:46:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: WDS Link Expected TX/RX rate</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/wds-link-expected-tx-rx-rate/m-p/54005#M6076</link>
      <description>Valter&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The rx/tx rate is a moving average of packets rx/tx over the link.  MCS is constantly changing depending on what is calculated by a rate selection algorithm, it must choose the best rate based upon the medium quality which, due to the nature of wifi, is not a fixed entity.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
As Volker suggested, using iperf over a clean link (without other user traffic) will allow you to get a better baseline.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
-Gareth&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2017 13:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/wds-link-expected-tx-rx-rate/m-p/54005#M6076</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gareth_Mitchell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-16T13:21:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: WDS Link Expected TX/RX rate</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/wds-link-expected-tx-rx-rate/m-p/54006#M6077</link>
      <description>I understand, &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I'm not looking for real values, I mean the rate the radios negotiate during establishing a connection. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Volker, in your opinion, the AP3965i can work as I see with 4 streams in close distance 5 Meters, but when setup for 30 Meters , only 2 or 3 of the 4 streams can be received by the remote AP ? This is because the internal antena designe location ?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The system mesh report with: &lt;BR /&gt;
    Rx Rss -28 with Rx/Tx 1560 / 780 power 12 dB 5 Meters&lt;BR /&gt;
    Rx Rss -48 with Rx/Tx 877 / 780   power 19 dB 30 Meters&lt;BR /&gt;
    Rx Rss -58 with Rx/Tx 780 / 780    power 12 dB 30 Meters&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I was changing the power, from 12 to 19 and the Rx Rss has move from -58 to -48 but the Rx/Tx was not significant.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
What is the impact of Rx Rss in the calculated by a rate selection algorithm ?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
VVeiga&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2017 20:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-identifi/wds-link-expected-tx-rx-rate/m-p/54006#M6077</guid>
      <dc:creator>Valter_Veiga</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-16T20:28:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

