<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic RE: Wireless Roaming Issue in ExtremeWireless (WiNG)</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wireless-roaming-issue/m-p/53487#M3235</link>
    <description>It can take a significant amount of time to roam when performing the whole .1X hand shaking.  With a PSK roam times should be sub 40ms.  Test with a PSK and see if the problem persists.  The reason I say this is to take variables(.1X auth) out of the equation. If roam times improve with a PSK then you may need PMK caching or fast roaming enabled.  If it does not improve the client and WLAN design may a better starting point.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2014 22:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jon_Linton</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-03-31T22:10:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Wireless Roaming Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wireless-roaming-issue/m-p/53485#M3233</link>
      <description>Using an Extreme Networks WM3700 Controller with 4610APs. I run a ping test when roaming around floors and get dropped for 1-2 pings often. Happens on all 5 floors. Is there something in the WM3700 Controller configuration that needs to be set for seamless roaming or is this behavior common.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2014 23:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wireless-roaming-issue/m-p/53485#M3233</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ralph_Allen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-03-29T23:59:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Wireless Roaming Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wireless-roaming-issue/m-p/53486#M3234</link>
      <description>Have you enabled the fast roaming on WM controller?&lt;BR /&gt;
The bridging mode should be tunnel for the wireless lan.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If above setting are correct then try configure the wireless  clients NIC card setting, &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The following is copied from &lt;A href="http://www.intel.com/support/wireless/wlan/sb/cs-025393.htm" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener"&gt;Intel  wireless client online help page&lt;/A&gt;:    &lt;B&gt;Roaming Aggressiveness&lt;BR /&gt;
  &lt;/B&gt;This setting allows you to define how  aggressively your Wi-Fi client roams to improve connection to an access point.  Click &lt;B&gt;Use default value&lt;/B&gt; to balance between not roaming and performance.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
    ·          &lt;B&gt;Lowest:&lt;/B&gt; Your wireless client will not roam. Only significant  link quality degradation causes it to roam to another access point. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
    ·          &lt;B&gt;Medium-Low/Medium-High&lt;/B&gt;: Allow Roaming. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
    ·          &lt;B&gt;Medium:&lt;/B&gt; Balanced setting between not roaming and performance.  &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
    ·          &lt;B&gt;Highest:&lt;/B&gt; Your Wi-Fi client continuously tracks the link  quality. If any degradation occurs, it tries to find and roam to a better  access point.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2014 06:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wireless-roaming-issue/m-p/53486#M3234</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sumit_Tokle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-03-30T06:28:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Wireless Roaming Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wireless-roaming-issue/m-p/53487#M3235</link>
      <description>It can take a significant amount of time to roam when performing the whole .1X hand shaking.  With a PSK roam times should be sub 40ms.  Test with a PSK and see if the problem persists.  The reason I say this is to take variables(.1X auth) out of the equation. If roam times improve with a PSK then you may need PMK caching or fast roaming enabled.  If it does not improve the client and WLAN design may a better starting point.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2014 22:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wireless-roaming-issue/m-p/53487#M3235</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jon_Linton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-03-31T22:10:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Wireless Roaming Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wireless-roaming-issue/m-p/53488#M3236</link>
      <description>Sorry but it's hard to give good feedback with the limited information in your post.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The most important thing for WLAN troubleshooting is to know the behavior of your test equipment.&lt;BR /&gt;
If your WLAN adapter is "not very good" a ping loss could be normal for that adapter (unfortunately there are still a lot of very bad adapters on the market).&lt;BR /&gt;
Another type of WLAN adapter could roam without a ping loss in the same situation.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
My laptop for example... I know exactly how my adapter is configured (802.11n 5GHz only, aggressive roaming), sometimes one ping loss during roaming, +3dB better signal then most other WLAN adapter.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
So play around with your client on a open/none SSID to understand what "normal" is for your device and test again other adapter/devices to see a difference.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2014 21:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wireless-roaming-issue/m-p/53488#M3236</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ronald_Dvorak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-01T21:56:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

