<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic RE: RF-Domain in ExtremeWireless (WiNG)</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/rf-domain/m-p/54497#M3472</link>
    <description>Ondrej,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Is there any information as to &lt;B&gt;﻿WHY&lt;/B&gt;﻿ there must not be any AP in the RF-Domain where the cluster resides?  All the docs, training, etc. say not to do it, but the understanding of a concept is reinforced when the underlying cause/effects are explained.&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks!</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 16:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Andrew_Webster</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-02-23T16:32:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>RF-Domain</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/rf-domain/m-p/54495#M3470</link>
      <description>I'm about to deploy a new VX9000 cluster and have read in the best practices that in a centralized/NOC deployment mode it's best to create a separate RF-domain for the controllers. In our case we will have each instance (standby/active) in different subnets so would we add both to the same RF-Domain? I don't think it's an issue as they would build the cluster up on layer 3 mint links?&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 16:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/rf-domain/m-p/54495#M3470</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bruno_Amarante</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-23T16:26:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: RF-Domain</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/rf-domain/m-p/54496#M3471</link>
      <description>Hi Bruno,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
IP links in different subnets are not a problem, but both devices shall stay in same RF-Domain.&lt;BR /&gt;
Either keep both in "default" or move them to new one just for the cluster.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
To maintain hierarchical structure, there must &lt;B&gt;NOT&lt;/B&gt; be any AP in the RF-Domain where cluster resides.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;
Ondrej</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 16:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/rf-domain/m-p/54496#M3471</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ondrej_Lepa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-23T16:32:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: RF-Domain</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/rf-domain/m-p/54497#M3472</link>
      <description>Ondrej,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Is there any information as to &lt;B&gt;﻿WHY&lt;/B&gt;﻿ there must not be any AP in the RF-Domain where the cluster resides?  All the docs, training, etc. say not to do it, but the understanding of a concept is reinforced when the underlying cause/effects are explained.&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks!</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 16:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/rf-domain/m-p/54497#M3472</guid>
      <dc:creator>Andrew_Webster</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-23T16:32:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: RF-Domain</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/rf-domain/m-p/54498#M3473</link>
      <description>Thanks Ondrej</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 16:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/rf-domain/m-p/54498#M3473</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bruno_Amarante</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-23T16:37:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

