<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic RE: wing 5.8.5 reports AP's as down but they are not in ExtremeWireless (WiNG)</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wing-5-8-5-reports-ap-s-as-down-but-they-are-not/m-p/18868#M936</link>
    <description>Hi Andrew&lt;BR /&gt;
    I think I will take the RFS units offline and remove the startup-confing from them then fire tha last known config back in, this was taken on the 26/5/17, As I know this config was working it should rule out the RFS and the AP's. The plan is to do this tomorrow morning.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I have setup a new vlan on the nortel switches vlan800 - now this is where i struggle a bit&lt;BR /&gt;
if I setup vlan 800 do i set the cluster vlan to 800 on the RFS units  and then on the AP's set the controller valn to 800 ?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
then on the AP under networks ge1 set the native vlan to 800 ? and then allow the other two vlans 1,10&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2017 15:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Phil_storey</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-07-07T15:30:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>wing 5.8.5 reports AP's as down but they are not</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wing-5-8-5-reports-ap-s-as-down-but-they-are-not/m-p/18842#M910</link>
      <description>Hi All&lt;BR /&gt;
   We had a power outage last week, some parts of the network stayed up on the UPS and others the UPS's failed after 20 mins. since then the RFS shows that some of the AP's are down, but they have clients connected, I can get onto the AP's being shown as down via the AP's ip address, I have reset the units, but the RFS ( wing 5.8.5 ) still shows as down ?&lt;BR /&gt;
I have also restarted the RFS units as well.&lt;BR /&gt;
now Im confused ( Oh no I'm always confused , thats normal )&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2017 16:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wing-5-8-5-reports-ap-s-as-down-but-they-are-not/m-p/18842#M910</guid>
      <dc:creator>Phil_storey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-29T16:28:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: wing 5.8.5 reports AP's as down but they are not</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wing-5-8-5-reports-ap-s-as-down-but-they-are-not/m-p/18843#M911</link>
      <description>Hi Phil the RFS showing some APs are down, is pointing to an adoption issue. If you log into the controllers CLI, ans do a "show adoption offline", do the 'DOWN APs show up?. You can also log directly into the AP and enter "show adoption st". It will tell you the AP is not adopted.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The AP will be able to handle users if all the VLANS are locally bridged. In this configuration, the WLAN does not require any of the CONTROLLER's resource.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The Adoption issue will require some investigation. If the AP is on a VLAN different from the Controller, it will nee an "controller host" entry to point back to the Controller&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2017 17:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wing-5-8-5-reports-ap-s-as-down-but-they-are-not/m-p/18843#M911</guid>
      <dc:creator>aholden</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-29T17:24:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: wing 5.8.5 reports AP's as down but they are not</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wing-5-8-5-reports-ap-s-as-down-but-they-are-not/m-p/18844#M912</link>
      <description>Phil once you're in via putty ( CLI) in the AP's/RFS also share the output of command 'show version' for both.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2017 17:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wing-5-8-5-reports-ap-s-as-down-but-they-are-not/m-p/18844#M912</guid>
      <dc:creator>RobertZ</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-29T17:31:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: wing 5.8.5 reports AP's as down but they are not</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wing-5-8-5-reports-ap-s-as-down-but-they-are-not/m-p/18845#M913</link>
      <description>Hi Phil,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
As Andy expressed and Rob alluded to. Please verify the AP adoption status and that they show adopted and configured.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2017 22:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wing-5-8-5-reports-ap-s-as-down-but-they-are-not/m-p/18845#M913</guid>
      <dc:creator>Daniel_Mejia</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-29T22:09:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: wing 5.8.5 reports AP's as down but they are not</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wing-5-8-5-reports-ap-s-as-down-but-they-are-not/m-p/18846#M914</link>
      <description>Additional you can check if you see MINT neighbors.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
show mint neighbors&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
MINT is used for communicating between all WiNG devices. Are all devisees using the same VLAN?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2017 00:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wing-5-8-5-reports-ap-s-as-down-but-they-are-not/m-p/18846#M914</guid>
      <dc:creator>Timo1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-30T00:35:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: wing 5.8.5 reports AP's as down but they are not</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wing-5-8-5-reports-ap-s-as-down-but-they-are-not/m-p/18847#M915</link>
      <description>Since you had a power outage, I would start with ensuring uplinks/VLANs/trunking is all still properly configured from the switches back to the RFS.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2017 01:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wing-5-8-5-reports-ap-s-as-down-but-they-are-not/m-p/18847#M915</guid>
      <dc:creator>Justin_Cox</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-30T01:08:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: wing 5.8.5 reports AP's as down but they are not</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wing-5-8-5-reports-ap-s-as-down-but-they-are-not/m-p/18848#M916</link>
      <description>Good point Justin, it's also possible that there were uncommitted changes made to the configuration that were lost with the power outage.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Phil, hopefully you have a backup of the configuration and can verify the settings are the same. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2017 01:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wing-5-8-5-reports-ap-s-as-down-but-they-are-not/m-p/18848#M916</guid>
      <dc:creator>Daniel_Mejia</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-30T01:17:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: wing 5.8.5 reports AP's as down but they are not</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wing-5-8-5-reports-ap-s-as-down-but-they-are-not/m-p/18849#M917</link>
      <description>Hi&lt;BR /&gt;
   This is very strange, So we have a mixture of AP7532's and 7131, split accross two server rooms,&lt;BR /&gt;
the AP7532's have all come back, but none of the AP7131's &lt;BR /&gt;
The AP's connect to a Nortel 5520 in either server room and the switches are part of a stack. the AP's sit on VLAN 1 ( flat network )The two RFS units show up in the gui, &lt;BR /&gt;
I have restarted teh AP7131 and the notel 5520's&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The show mint neighbours &lt;BR /&gt;
rfs7000-Backup(config)*#sh mint neighbors&lt;BR /&gt;
5 mint neighbors of 70.38.0A.F9:&lt;BR /&gt;
4D.80.C3.AC (ap7532-MO-Nr-HR) at level 1, best adjacency vlan-1&lt;BR /&gt;
4D.80.C5.F4 (AP7532-ICT-B4a) at level 1, best adjacency vlan-1&lt;BR /&gt;
4D.80.C6.24 (ap7532-B4-Stores) at level 1, best adjacency vlan-1&lt;BR /&gt;
4D.82.BD.80 (ap7532-B4-CommsRoom) at level 1, best adjacency vlan-1&lt;BR /&gt;
70.81.BE.8E (rfs7000-Primary) at level 1&lt;BR /&gt;
Even the Primary RFS is no showing as down in the gui from the backup unit&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The AP732's seem fine its Just the AP7131 units, although 1 unit is showing and Both RFS units are working</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2017 10:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wing-5-8-5-reports-ap-s-as-down-but-they-are-not/m-p/18849#M917</guid>
      <dc:creator>Phil_storey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-30T10:33:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: wing 5.8.5 reports AP's as down but they are not</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wing-5-8-5-reports-ap-s-as-down-but-they-are-not/m-p/18850#M918</link>
      <description>Sounds like your cluster could be at issue.  Make sure both members of the cluster are present and it is working as expected.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
From the cli:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
show cluster members&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2017 17:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wing-5-8-5-reports-ap-s-as-down-but-they-are-not/m-p/18850#M918</guid>
      <dc:creator>Andrew_Webster</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-30T17:52:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: wing 5.8.5 reports AP's as down but they are not</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wing-5-8-5-reports-ap-s-as-down-but-they-are-not/m-p/18851#M919</link>
      <description>Hi Andrew&lt;BR /&gt;
     the cluster is their&lt;BR /&gt;
 rfs7000-Backup*   70.38.0A.F9   00-15-70-38-0A-F9   False   standby           00:01:30 ago&lt;BR /&gt;
 rfs7000-Primary   70.81.BE.8E   00-15-70-81-BE-8E   True    active            self&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
But I might have a bigger problem, I set the syslog running and this is is what is comming in&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Jun 30 16:02:46 172.17.146.105 2017-06-30T16:02:46.139223+01:00 rfs7000-Primary %DATAPLANE-4-DOSATTACK: IPSPOOF ATTACK:  Source IP is Spoofed : Src IP : 10.0.0.138, Dst IP: 224.0.0.22, Src Mac: 58-98-35-9D-7A-44, Dst Mac: 01-00-5E-00-00-16, Proto = 2. &lt;BR /&gt;
Jun 30 16:02:52 172.17.146.105 2017-06-30T16:02:52.698984+01:00 rfs7000-Primary %DEVICE-4-OFFLINE: Device 00-15-70-EB-7D-00(ap7131-2) is offline, last seen:10 minutes ago on switchport - &lt;BR /&gt;
Jun 30 16:02:52 172.17.146.105 2017-06-30T16:02:52.704019+01:00 rfs7000-Primary %DEVICE-4-OFFLINE: Device 00-24-38-F3-72-00(ap7131-5) is offline, last seen:10 minutes ago on switchport - &lt;BR /&gt;
Jun 30 16:02:52 172.17.146.105 2017-06-30T16:02:52.710750+01:00 rfs7000-Primary %DEVICE-4-OFFLINE: Device 00-15-70-EB-96-CC(ap7131-4-PC02) is offline, last seen:10 minutes ago on switchport - &lt;BR /&gt;
Jun 30 16:03:02 172.17.146.105 2017-06-30T16:03:02.784410+01:00 rfs7000-Primary %DATAPLANE-4-ARPPOISON: ARP CACHE POISONING:  Conflicting ethernet header and inner arp header :Ethernet Src Mac: 00-11-25-8E-2E-5E, Ethernet Dst Mac: FF-FF-FF-FF-FF-FF, ARP Src Mac: 00-03-FF-09-64-DE, ARP Dst Mac: 00-00-00-00-00-00, ARP Src IP: 172.17.152.4, ARP Target IP: 172.17.144.81 . &lt;BR /&gt;
Jun 30 16:03:05 172.17.146.105 2017-06-30T16:03:05.921494+01:00 rfs7000-Primary %DATAPLANE-4-ARPPOISON: ARP CACHE POISONING:  Conflicting ethernet header and inner arp header :Ethernet Src Mac: 00-11-25-8E-2E-5E, Ethernet Dst Mac: FF-FF-FF-FF-FF-FF, ARP Src Mac: 00-03-FF-9A-2E-5E, ARP Dst Mac: 00-00-00-00-00-00, ARP Src IP: 172.17.148.19, ARP Target IP: 172.17.144.71 . &lt;BR /&gt;
Jun 30 16:03:07 172.17.146.105 2017-06-30T16:03:07.760199+01:00 rfs7000-Primary %DATAPLANE-4-ARPPOISON: ARP CACHE POISONING:  Conflicting ethernet header and inner arp header :Ethernet Src Mac: 00-14-5E-A4-7D-04, Ethernet Dst Mac: FF-FF-FF-FF-FF-FF, ARP Src Mac: 00-03-FF-9D-4A-76, ARP Dst Mac: 00-00-00-00-00-00, ARP Src IP: 172.17.151.26, ARP Target IP: 172.17.144.71 . &lt;BR /&gt;
Jun 30 16:03:24 172.17.146.105 2017-06-30T16:03:24.183555+01:00 rfs7000-Primary %DATAPLANE-4-ARPPOISON: ARP CACHE POISONING:  Conflicting ethernet header and inner arp header :Ethernet Src Mac: 00-11-25-8E-2E-5E, Ethernet Dst Mac: FF-FF-FF-FF-FF-FF, ARP Src Mac: 00-03-FF-09-64-DE, ARP Dst Mac: 00-00-00-00-00-00, ARP Src IP: 172.17.152.4, ARP Target IP: 172.17.144.59 . &lt;BR /&gt;
Jun 30 16:03:26 172.17.146.105 2017-06-30T16:03:26.885160+01:00 rfs7000-Primary %DATAPLANE-4-ARPPOISON: ARP CACHE POISONING:  Conflicting ethernet header and inner arp header :Ethernet Src Mac: 00-11-25-8E-2E-5E, Ethernet Dst Mac: FF-FF-FF-FF-FF-FF, ARP Src Mac: Jun 30 16:02:46 172.17.146.105 2017-06-30T16:02:46.139223+01:00 rfs7000-Primary %DATAPLANE-4-DOSATTACK: IPSPOOF ATTACK:  Source IP is Spoofed : Src IP : 10.0.0.138, Dst IP: 224.0.0.22, Src Mac: 58-98-35-9D-7A-44, Dst Mac: 01-00-5E-00-00-16, Proto = 2. &lt;BR /&gt;
Jun 30 16:02:52 172.17.146.105 2017-06-30T16:02:52.698984+01:00 rfs7000-Primary %DEVICE-4-OFFLINE: Device 00-15-70-EB-7D-00(ap7131-2) is offline, last seen:10 minutes ago on switchport - &lt;BR /&gt;
Jun 30 16:02:52 172.17.146.105 2017-06-30T16:02:52.704019+01:00 rfs7000-Primary %DEVICE-4-OFFLINE: Device 00-24-38-F3-72-00(ap7131-5) is offline, last seen:10 minutes ago on switchport - &lt;BR /&gt;
Jun 30 16:02:52 172.17.146.105 2017-06-30T16:02:52.710750+01:00 rfs7000-Primary %DEVICE-4-OFFLINE: Device 00-15-70-EB-96-CC(ap7131-4-PC02) is offline, last seen:10 minutes ago on switchport - &lt;BR /&gt;
Jun 30 16:03:02 172.17.146.105 2017-06-30T16:03:02.784410+01:00 rfs7000-Primary %DATAPLANE-4-ARPPOISON: ARP CACHE POISONING:  Conflicting ethernet header and inner arp header :Ethernet Src Mac: 00-11-25-8E-2E-5E, Ethernet Dst Mac: FF-FF-FF-FF-FF-FF, ARP Src Mac: 00-03-FF-09-64-DE, ARP Dst Mac: 00-00-00-00-00-00, ARP Src IP: 172.17.152.4, ARP Target IP: 172.17.144.81 . &lt;BR /&gt;
Jun 30 16:03:05 172.17.146.105 2017-06-30T16:03:05.921494+01:00 rfs7000-Primary %DATAPLANE-4-ARPPOISON: ARP CACHE POISONING:  Conflicting ethernet header and inner arp header :Ethernet Src Mac: 00-11-25-8E-2E-5E, Ethernet Dst Mac: FF-FF-FF-FF-FF-FF, ARP Src Mac: 00-03-FF-9A-2E-5E, ARP Dst Mac: 00-00-00-00-00-00, ARP Src IP: 172.17.148.19, ARP Target IP: 172.17.144.71 . &lt;BR /&gt;
Jun 30 16:03:07 172.17.146.105 2017-06-30T16:03:07.760199+01:00 rfs7000-Primary %DATAPLANE-4-ARPPOISON: ARP CACHE POISONING:  Conflicting ethernet header and inner arp header :Ethernet Src Mac: 00-14-5E-A4-7D-04, Ethernet Dst Mac: FF-FF-FF-FF-FF-FF, ARP Src Mac: 00-03-FF-9D-4A-76, ARP Dst Mac: 00-00-00-00-00-00, ARP Src IP: 172.17.151.26, ARP Target IP: 172.17.144.71 . &lt;BR /&gt;
Jun 30 16:03:24 172.17.146.105 2017-06-30T16:03:24.183555+01:00 rfs7000-Primary %DATAPLANE-4-ARPPOISON: ARP CACHE POISONING:  Conflicting ethernet header and inner arp header :Ethernet Src Mac: 00-11-25-8E-2E-5E, Ethernet Dst Mac: FF-FF-FF-FF-FF-FF, ARP Src Mac: 00-03-FF-09-64-DE, ARP Dst Mac: 00-00-00-00-00-00, ARP Src IP: 172.17.152.4, ARP Target IP: 172.17.144.59 . &lt;BR /&gt;
Jun 30 16:03:26 172.17.146.105 2017-06-30T16:03:26.885160+01:00 rfs7000-Primary %DATAPLANE-4-ARPPOISON: ARP CACHE POISONING:  Conflicting ethernet header and inner arp header :Ethernet Src Mac: 00-11-25-8E-2E-5E, Ethernet Dst Mac: FF-FF-FF-FF-FF-FF, ARP Src Mac: 00-03-FF-9A-2E-5E, ARP Dst Mac: 00-00-00-00-00-00, ARP Src IP: 172.17.148.19, ARP Target IP: 172.17.144.71 . &lt;BR /&gt;
Jun 30 16:03:28 172.17.146.105 2017-06-30T16:03:28.723856+01:00 rfs7000-Primary %DATAPLANE-4-ARPPOISON: ARP CACHE POISONING:  Conflicting ethernet header and inner arp header :Ethernet Src Mac: 00-14-5E-A4-7D-04, Ethernet Dst Mac: FF-FF-FF-FF-FF-FF, ARP Src Mac: 00-03-FF-9D-4A-76, ARP Dst Mac: 00-00-00-00-00-00, ARP Src IP: 172.17.151.26, ARP Target IP: 172.17.144.71 . &lt;BR /&gt;
, ARP Dst Mac: 00-00-00-00-00-00, ARP Src IP: 172.17.148.19, ARP Target IP: 172.17.144.71 . &lt;BR /&gt;
Jun 30 16:03:28 172.17.146.105 2017-06-30T16:03:28.723856+01:00 rfs7000-Primary %DATAPLANE-4-ARPPOISON: ARP CACHE POISONING:  Conflicting ethernet header and inner arp header :Ethernet Src Mac: 00-14-5E-A4-7D-04, Ethernet Dst Mac: FF-FF-FF-FF-FF-FF, ARP Src Mac: 00-03-FF-9D-4A-76, ARP Dst Mac: 00-00-00-00-00-00, ARP Src IP: 172.17.151.26, ARP Target IP: 172.17.144.71 . &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I have enabled Arp trust on ge1&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
 no stateful-packet-inspection-l2&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
no sure if this is correct, &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
This is where I'm clueless or should it be more clueless than usual &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":disappointed_face:"&gt;😞&lt;/span&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2017 21:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wing-5-8-5-reports-ap-s-as-down-but-they-are-not/m-p/18851#M919</guid>
      <dc:creator>Phil_storey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-30T21:04:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: wing 5.8.5 reports AP's as down but they are not</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wing-5-8-5-reports-ap-s-as-down-but-they-are-not/m-p/18852#M920</link>
      <description>looking on the RFS events  The AP's seem to be avaiable and then drop off &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P class="fancybox-image"&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="4348200c6c8942f181db1f156b813344_RackMultipart20170630-54520-1jo8d1x-event_inline.jpg"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/5810iCEAC4D63BD3ADB27/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="4348200c6c8942f181db1f156b813344_RackMultipart20170630-54520-1jo8d1x-event_inline.jpg" alt="4348200c6c8942f181db1f156b813344_RackMultipart20170630-54520-1jo8d1x-event_inline.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2017 21:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wing-5-8-5-reports-ap-s-as-down-but-they-are-not/m-p/18852#M920</guid>
      <dc:creator>Phil_storey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-30T21:32:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: wing 5.8.5 reports AP's as down but they are not</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wing-5-8-5-reports-ap-s-as-down-but-they-are-not/m-p/18853#M921</link>
      <description>Phil,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Are there any other RFS devices connected anywhere on the network besides the two RFS7000s ?  &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
As you said, the 7131 seem to be dropping off the network, so you'd need to track down why this is happening. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I find that the show mint mlcp history command is the most useful for troubleshooting adoption issues, but it takes some time to figure out what all the messages indicate.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
 You can try the following from the CLI of the Primary RFS:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
show mint mlcp history The command will give you an output of all the mint level handshake going on between devices.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Here's what it looks like on the RFS when an AP is adopted (time goes backwards):&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;2017-06-14 09:37:10:Adopted 5C-0E-8B-34-E3-28 (0B.34.E3.28), cfgd notified&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-06-14 09:37:10:Sending MLCP Offer to 0B.34.E3.28 (link_level=1, preferred=0, capacity=144)&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-06-14 09:37:10:Sending MLCP Offer to 0B.34.E3.28 (link_level=1, preferred=0, capacity=144)&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-06-14 09:37:10:Sending MLCP Offer to 0B.34.E3.28 (link_level=1, preferred=0, capacity=144)&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-06-14 09:37:10:Sending MLCP Reply to (00.00.00.00,34,1,227.40.0.0:23566/5C-0E-8B-34-E3-28)&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-06-14 09:37:10:Sending MLCP Offer to 0B.34.E3.28 (link_level=1, preferred=0, capacity=144)&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;To get the view from the 7131, you will also need to issue the same command on one of the 7131s that is not adopting.  You should be able to SSH to it.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
And this is what it looks like from the AP's perspective:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;2017-06-14 09:37:10:Received OK from cfgd, adoption complete to 0B.1B.2A.E2&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-06-14 09:37:10:Waiting for cfgd OK, adopter should be 0B.1B.2A.E2&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-06-14 09:37:10:Adoption state change: 'Connecting to adopter' to 'Waiting for Adoption OK'&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-06-14 09:37:10:Adoption state change: 'No adopters found' to 'Connecting to adopter'&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-06-14 09:37:10:Try to adopt to 0B.1B.2A.E2 (cluster master 0B.1B.2A.E2 in adopters)&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2017 22:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wing-5-8-5-reports-ap-s-as-down-but-they-are-not/m-p/18853#M921</guid>
      <dc:creator>Andrew_Webster</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-30T22:33:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: wing 5.8.5 reports AP's as down but they are not</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wing-5-8-5-reports-ap-s-as-down-but-they-are-not/m-p/18854#M922</link>
      <description>On this note... at one time another provider installed a controller that started adopting our APs because we had a part of their network accessible. That's a good angle to search on.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2017 22:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wing-5-8-5-reports-ap-s-as-down-but-they-are-not/m-p/18854#M922</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kendal_Ingraham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-30T22:33:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: wing 5.8.5 reports AP's as down but they are not</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wing-5-8-5-reports-ap-s-as-down-but-they-are-not/m-p/18855#M923</link>
      <description>Hi, This is the output from one of the AP7131's, Its very strange that the AP7532's seem unaffected. if any ap's were set to controller capable would that affect anything ?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I will drop the output of the RFS later, as they too have now dropped off the network &lt;BR /&gt;
it goes from bad to worse  &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
ap7131-7-PC01(config)#show mint mlcp history&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 20:39:37:Adoption state change: 'Waiting to retry' to 'No adopters found'&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 20:39:26:cfgd notified dpd2 of unadoption, restart adoption after 11 seconds&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 20:39:26:Adoption state change: 'Adopted' to 'Waiting to retry'&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 20:39:26:Adopter 70.38.0A.F9 is no longer reachable, cfgd notified&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 20:39:26:All adopters lost, restarting MLCP&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 20:39:26:MLCP link vlan-1 offerer 70.38.0A.F9 lost, restarting discovery&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:52:15:Received OK from cfgd, adoption complete to 70.38.0A.F9&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:52:15:Waiting for cfgd OK, adopter should be 70.38.0A.F9&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:52:15:Adoption state change: 'Connecting to adopter' to 'Waiting for Adoption OK'&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:52:13:Adoption state change: 'No adopters found' to 'Connecting to adopter'&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:52:13:Try to adopt to 70.38.0A.F9 (cluster master 70.38.0A.F9 in adopters)&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:51:14:Adoption state change: 'Waiting to retry' to 'No adopters found'&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:51:05:cfgd notified dpd2 of unadoption, restart adoption after 9 seconds&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:51:05:Adoption state change: 'Adopted' to 'Waiting to retry'&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:51:05:Adopter 70.38.0A.F9 is no longer reachable, cfgd notified&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:51:05:MLCP created VLAN link on VLAN 1, offer from 00-15-70-38-0A-F9&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:51:05:MLCP VLAN link already exists&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:51:05:Sending MLCP Request to 00-15-70-38-0A-F9 vlan 1&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:51:05:All adopters lost, restarting MLCP&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:42:42:Received OK from cfgd, adoption complete to 70.38.0A.F9&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:42:42:Waiting for cfgd OK, adopter should be 70.38.0A.F9&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:42:42:Adoption state change: 'Connecting to adopter' to 'Waiting for Adoption OK'&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:42:42:Adoption state change: 'Adoption failed' to 'Connecting to adopter'&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:42:42:Try to adopt to 70.38.0A.F9 (cluster master 00.00.00.00 in adopters)&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:42:12:Adoption state change: 'Connecting to adopter' to 'Adoption failed': Connection error 145&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:41:47:Adoption state change: 'Waiting to retry' to 'Connecting to adopter'&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:41:47:Try to adopt to 70.38.0A.F9 (cluster master 70.38.0A.F9 in adopters)&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:41:40:MLCP created VLAN link on VLAN 1, offer from 00-15-70-38-0A-F9&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:41:40:MLCP VLAN link already exists&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:41:40:Sending MLCP Request to 00-15-70-38-0A-F9 vlan 1&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:41:40:All adopters lost, restarting MLCP&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:41:38:MLCP created VLAN link on VLAN 1, offer from 00-15-70-38-0A-F9&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:41:38:Sending MLCP Request to 00-15-70-38-0A-F9 vlan 1&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:41:38:MLCP link vlan-1 offerer 70.38.0A.F9 lost, restarting discovery&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:41:38:cfgd notified dpd2 of unadoption, restart adoption after 9 seconds&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:41:38:Adoption state change: 'Adopted' to 'Waiting to retry'&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:40:50:Received OK from cfgd, adoption complete to 70.38.0A.F9&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:40:50:Waiting for cfgd OK, adopter should be 70.38.0A.F9&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:40:50:Adoption state change: 'Connecting to adopter' to 'Waiting for Adoption OK'&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:40:50:Adoption state change: 'Waiting to retry' to 'Connecting to adopter'&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:40:50:Try to adopt to 70.38.0A.F9 (cluster master 70.38.0A.F9 in adopters)&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:40:38:MLCP created VLAN link on VLAN 1, offer from 00-15-70-38-0A-F9&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:40:38:MLCP VLAN link already exists&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:40:38:Sending MLCP Request to 00-15-70-38-0A-F9 vlan 1&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:40:38:All adopters lost, restarting MLCP&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:40:38:MLCP created VLAN link on VLAN 1, offer from 00-15-70-38-0A-F9&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:40:38:Sending MLCP Request to 00-15-70-38-0A-F9 vlan 1&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:40:38:MLCP link vlan-1 offerer 70.38.0A.F9 lost, restarting discovery&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:40:38:cfgd notified dpd2 of unadoption, restart adoption after 12 seconds&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:40:38:Adoption state change: 'Adopted' to 'Waiting to retry'&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:39:43:Received OK from cfgd, adoption complete to 70.38.0A.F9&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:39:42:Waiting for cfgd OK, adopter should be 70.38.0A.F9&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:39:42:Adoption state change: 'Connecting to adopter' to 'Waiting for Adoption OK'&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:39:39:Adoption state change: 'No adopters found' to 'Connecting to adopter'&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:39:39:Try to adopt to 70.38.0A.F9 (cluster master 70.38.0A.F9 in adopters)&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:39:34:Adoption state change: 'Waiting to retry' to 'No adopters found'&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:39:29:cfgd notified dpd2 of unadoption, restart adoption after 5 seconds&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:39:29:Adoption state change: 'Adopted' to 'Waiting to retry'&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:39:29:Adopter 70.38.0A.F9 is no longer reachable, cfgd notified&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:39:29:MLCP created VLAN link on VLAN 1, offer from 00-15-70-38-0A-F9&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:39:29:MLCP VLAN link already exists&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:39:29:Sending MLCP Request to 00-15-70-38-0A-F9 vlan 1&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:39:29:All adopters lost, restarting MLCP&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:38:48:Received OK from cfgd, adoption complete to 70.38.0A.F9&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:38:48:Waiting for cfgd OK, adopter should be 70.38.0A.F9&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:38:48:Adoption state change: 'Connecting to adopter' to 'Waiting for Adoption OK'&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:38:48:Adoption state change: 'Waiting to retry' to 'Connecting to adopter'&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:38:48:Try to adopt to 70.38.0A.F9 (cluster master 70.38.0A.F9 in adopters)&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:38:38:MLCP created VLAN link on VLAN 1, offer from 00-15-70-38-0A-F9&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:38:38:Sending MLCP Request to 00-15-70-38-0A-F9 vlan 1&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:38:38:MLCP link vlan-1 offerer 70.38.0A.F9 lost, restarting discovery&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:38:38:cfgd notified dpd2 of unadoption, restart adoption after 10 seconds&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:38:38:Adoption state change: 'Adopted' to 'Waiting to retry'&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:38:23:Received OK from cfgd, adoption complete to 70.38.0A.F9&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:38:23:Waiting for cfgd OK, adopter should be 70.38.0A.F9&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:38:23:Adoption state change: 'Connecting to adopter' to 'Waiting for Adoption OK'&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:38:23:Adoption state change: 'Adoption failed' to 'Connecting to adopter'&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:38:23:Try to adopt to 70.38.0A.F9 (cluster master 00.00.00.00 in adopters)&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:37:53:Adoption state change: 'Connecting to adopter' to 'Adoption failed': Connection error 145&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:37:27:Adoption state change: 'Adoption failed' to 'Connecting to adopter'&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:37:27:Try to adopt to 70.38.0A.F9 (cluster master 00.00.00.00 in adopters)&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:37:24:Adoption state change: 'Waiting for Adoption OK' to 'Adoption failed': Cluster master is unknown&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:37:24:Adoption state change: 'Connecting to adopter' to 'Waiting for Adoption OK'&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:37:24:Adoption state change: 'Adoption failed' to 'Connecting to adopter'&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:37:24:Try to adopt to 70.38.0A.F9 (cluster master 00.00.00.00 in adopters)&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:37:21:Adoption state change: 'Waiting for Adoption OK' to 'Adoption failed': Cluster master is unknown&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:37:21:Adoption state change: 'Connecting to adopter' to 'Waiting for Adoption OK'&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:37:21:Adoption state change: 'Adoption failed' to 'Connecting to adopter'&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:37:21:Try to adopt to 70.38.0A.F9 (cluster master 00.00.00.00 in adopters)&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:37:18:Adoption state change: 'Waiting for Adoption OK' to 'Adoption failed': Cluster master is unknown&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:37:18:Adoption state change: 'Connecting to adopter' to 'Waiting for Adoption OK'&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:37:18:Adoption state change: 'Adoption failed' to 'Connecting to adopter'&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:37:18:Try to adopt to 70.38.0A.F9 (cluster master 00.00.00.00 in adopters)&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:37:15:Adoption state change: 'Waiting for Adoption OK' to 'Adoption failed': Cluster master is unknown&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:37:15:Adoption state change: 'Connecting to adopter' to 'Waiting for Adoption OK'&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:37:12:Adoption state change: 'No adopters found' to 'Connecting to adopter'&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:37:12:Try to adopt to 70.38.0A.F9 (cluster master 70.38.0A.F9 in adopters)&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:37:11:Adoption state change: 'Adoption failed' to 'No adopters found'&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:37:00:MLCP created VLAN link on VLAN 1, offer from 00-15-70-38-0A-F9&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:37:00:MLCP VLAN link already exists&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:37:00:Sending MLCP Request to 00-15-70-38-0A-F9 vlan 1&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:37:00:All adopters lost, restarting MLCP&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:36:41:Adoption state change: 'Connecting to adopter' to 'Adoption failed': Connection error 145&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:36:16:Adoption state change: 'Waiting to retry' to 'Connecting to adopter'&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:36:16:Try to adopt to 70.38.0A.F9 (cluster master 70.38.0A.F9 in adopters)&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:36:10:MLCP created VLAN link on VLAN 1, offer from 00-15-70-38-0A-F9&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:36:10:Sending MLCP Request to 00-15-70-38-0A-F9 vlan 1&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:36:10:MLCP link vlan-1 offerer 70.38.0A.F9 lost, restarting discovery&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:36:10:cfgd notified dpd2 of unadoption, restart adoption after 6 seconds&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:36:10:Adoption state change: 'Adopted' to 'Waiting to retry'&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:34:11:Received OK from cfgd, adoption complete to 70.38.0A.F9&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:34:10:Waiting for cfgd OK, adopter should be 70.38.0A.F9&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:34:10:Adoption state change: 'Connecting to adopter' to 'Waiting for Adoption OK'&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:34:10:Adoption state change: 'Adoption failed' to 'Connecting to adopter'&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:34:10:Try to adopt to 70.38.0A.F9 (cluster master 00.00.00.00 in adopters)&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:33:40:Adoption state change: 'Connecting to adopter' to 'Adoption failed': Connection error 145&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:33:15:Adoption state change: 'Waiting to retry' to 'Connecting to adopter'&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:33:15:Try to adopt to 70.38.0A.F9 (cluster master 70.38.0A.F9 in adopters)&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:33:08:MLCP created VLAN link on VLAN 1, offer from 00-15-70-38-0A-F9&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:33:08:Sending MLCP Request to 00-15-70-38-0A-F9 vlan 1&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:33:08:MLCP link vlan-1 offerer 70.38.0A.F9 lost, restarting discovery&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:33:08:cfgd notified dpd2 of unadoption, restart adoption after 7 seconds&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:33:08:Adoption state change: 'Adopted' to 'Waiting to retry'&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:29:51:Received OK from cfgd, adoption complete to 70.38.0A.F9&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:29:51:Waiting for cfgd OK, adopter should be 70.38.0A.F9&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:29:51:Adoption state change: 'Connecting to adopter' to 'Waiting for Adoption OK'&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:29:51:Adoption state change: 'Adoption failed' to 'Connecting to adopter'&lt;BR /&gt;
2017-07-02 19:29:51:Try to adopt to 70.38.0A.F9 (cluster master 00.00.00.00 in adopters)&lt;BR /&gt;
ap7131-7-PC01(config)#&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2017 01:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wing-5-8-5-reports-ap-s-as-down-but-they-are-not/m-p/18855#M923</guid>
      <dc:creator>Phil_storey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-03T01:17:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: wing 5.8.5 reports AP's as down but they are not</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wing-5-8-5-reports-ap-s-as-down-but-they-are-not/m-p/18856#M924</link>
      <description>Phil,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Looking at your dump, it appears as if the config being pushed out the APs once they are adopted is "breaking" the connectivity with the RFS.  I can clearly see the AP is actually adopting, but then going into Waiting to retry state because it lost contact with the RFS.    &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The Backup RFS is also doing the adoption, which seems to differ from your show cluster members output of the other day.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Have a close look at the configuration going into the APs with the following command from the RFS:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
show run device &lt;I&gt;device_name&lt;/I&gt;&lt;I&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
This will show you the final, complete, config that is going to be sent to the device when it adopts, and the profiles are folded down, so you can actually see what the AP is going to get.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Pay close attention to the last block of configuration which will be the device itself, and particularly interface ge1 and vlan 1 configuration, then compare it with the configuration going out to the 7532s using the same command.  I suspect that something may have been modified in the 7131's profile hence the breakage you're experiencing.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2017 03:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wing-5-8-5-reports-ap-s-as-down-but-they-are-not/m-p/18856#M924</guid>
      <dc:creator>Andrew_Webster</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-03T03:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: wing 5.8.5 reports AP's as down but they are not</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wing-5-8-5-reports-ap-s-as-down-but-they-are-not/m-p/18857#M925</link>
      <description>Hi, this is the output from the rfs ( show run deveice ) the last block&lt;BR /&gt;
I'm not sure what bit I should be looking at.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
 interface ge1&lt;BR /&gt;
  speed 1000&lt;BR /&gt;
  switchport mode trunk&lt;BR /&gt;
  switchport trunk native vlan 1&lt;BR /&gt;
  no switchport trunk native tagged&lt;BR /&gt;
  switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-10&lt;BR /&gt;
  no cdp receive&lt;BR /&gt;
  no cdp transmit&lt;BR /&gt;
  no lldp receive&lt;BR /&gt;
  no lldp transmit&lt;BR /&gt;
 interface ge2&lt;BR /&gt;
  shutdown&lt;BR /&gt;
 interface vlan1&lt;BR /&gt;
  ip address dhcp&lt;BR /&gt;
  ip address zeroconf secondary&lt;BR /&gt;
  ip dhcp client request options all&lt;BR /&gt;
 interface wwan1&lt;BR /&gt;
 interface pppoe1&lt;BR /&gt;
 use event-system-policy AP-Down&lt;BR /&gt;
 use firewall-policy default&lt;BR /&gt;
 ntp server 172.17.144.150 prefer version 3&lt;BR /&gt;
 ntp server 172.17.144.151 version 3&lt;BR /&gt;
 use role-policy RBFW&lt;BR /&gt;
 email-notification host &lt;BR /&gt;
 email-notification recipient &lt;BR /&gt;
 logging on&lt;BR /&gt;
 controller hello-interval 60 adjacency-hold-time 180&lt;BR /&gt;
 service pm sys-restart&lt;BR /&gt;
 no upgrade opcode auto&lt;BR /&gt;
 no upgrade opcode path&lt;BR /&gt;
 no upgrade opcode reload&lt;BR /&gt;
 traffic-shape enable&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
It looks OK &lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2017 13:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wing-5-8-5-reports-ap-s-as-down-but-they-are-not/m-p/18857#M925</guid>
      <dc:creator>Phil_storey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-03T13:33:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: wing 5.8.5 reports AP's as down but they are not</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wing-5-8-5-reports-ap-s-as-down-but-they-are-not/m-p/18858#M926</link>
      <description>Looking at the syslog I also see this&lt;BR /&gt;
%DATAPLANE-4-RAGUARD: RA-GUARD:  router advertisement/redirect from/to untrusted port/wlan 0, vlan 1 : Src IP : fe80:0:0:0:217:c5ff:fe99:67a0, Dst IP: ff02:0:0:0:0:0:0:1, Src Mac: 00-17-C5-99-67-A0, Dst Mac: 33-33-00-00-00-01, ICMP type = 134, ICMP code = 0, Proto = 58.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Here its saying untrusted port/wlan 0 - there is no wlan 0 or port 0 i believe &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
It looks like IP6 which we do not use, is it worth turning the IP6 stuff off ?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2017 18:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wing-5-8-5-reports-ap-s-as-down-but-they-are-not/m-p/18858#M926</guid>
      <dc:creator>Phil_storey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-03T18:22:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: wing 5.8.5 reports AP's as down but they are not</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wing-5-8-5-reports-ap-s-as-down-but-they-are-not/m-p/18859#M927</link>
      <description>Phil,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Don't worry about IPv6.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The config looks ok, except the port speed setting.  As a general rule, gigabit networks should not use forced speed/duplex settings, in fact the standard mandates auto negotiation.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Your original post mentioned that all this started after a power failure, so I'm guessing some unsaved config changes got lost.  &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Check AP 7131 vs AP 7532 config differences, as well as the switch-port config of the respective switches they are connected to.  The mint MLCP output clearly shows APs getting adopted then dropping immediately afterward, indicating something about the config is breaking the connectivity.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Beyond this, I think some one-on-one troubleshooting and/or opening a case with GTAC is in order.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2017 19:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wing-5-8-5-reports-ap-s-as-down-but-they-are-not/m-p/18859#M927</guid>
      <dc:creator>Andrew_Webster</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-03T19:50:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: wing 5.8.5 reports AP's as down but they are not</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wing-5-8-5-reports-ap-s-as-down-but-they-are-not/m-p/18860#M928</link>
      <description>Can you login to one of the APs and  provide output of CLI command 'sh addoption history'</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2017 08:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wing-5-8-5-reports-ap-s-as-down-but-they-are-not/m-p/18860#M928</guid>
      <dc:creator>RobertZ</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-04T08:45:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: wing 5.8.5 reports AP's as down but they are not</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wing-5-8-5-reports-ap-s-as-down-but-they-are-not/m-p/18861#M929</link>
      <description>Hi, this is the output from the the sh adoption history.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
the RFS units are up and can see each other, they have ge1 set as a trunk port with Vlan 1 as the native vlan  ( currently not tagged ) and allowed vlans are 1 &amp;amp; 10&lt;BR /&gt;
the network switches have only 2 vlans 1 &amp;amp; 10 and the ports are allowed ( tagall )&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The AP/s have the Ge1 set as a trunk port with allowed vlans 1 &amp;amp; 10  ( native vlan untagged ) then there is wlan to vlan map in the wireless for the two wifi networks&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The network switches are Nortel currenly ( hoping to move to extreme in the very near future )&lt;BR /&gt;
but for now its nortel. This has all become a mistry as to what has gone wrong, Myself I think its the network switches, but its proving it. I suppose the other thing I could do is get a spare switch default&lt;BR /&gt;
then connect the rfs and some AP's in and see what happens ?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                        --------------------&lt;BR /&gt;
                MAC       TYPE             EVENT            TIME-STAMP                                                                                                              REASON&lt;BR /&gt;
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                        --------------------&lt;BR /&gt;
  00-15-70-81-BE-8E    RFS7000        un-adopted   2017-07-04 06:25:17   Adopter                                                                                         70.81.BE.8E is no longer reachable&lt;BR /&gt;
  00-15-70-81-BE-8E    RFS7000           adopted   2017-07-04 06:24:53                                                                                                                N.A.&lt;BR /&gt;
  00-15-70-81-BE-8E    RFS7000        un-adopted   2017-07-04 06:24:42   Adopter                                                                                         70.81.BE.8E is no longer reachable&lt;BR /&gt;
  00-15-70-81-BE-8E    RFS7000           adopted   2017-07-04 06:23:50                                                                                                                N.A.&lt;BR /&gt;
  00-15-70-81-BE-8E    RFS7000        un-adopted   2017-07-04 06:17:36   Adopter                                                                                         70.81.BE.8E is no longer reachable&lt;BR /&gt;
  00-15-70-81-BE-8E    RFS7000           adopted   2017-07-04 06:17:15                                                                                                                N.A.&lt;BR /&gt;
  00-15-70-81-BE-8E    RFS7000        un-adopted   2017-07-04 06:17:10   Receive                                                                                        d reset from switch 70.81.BE.8E,  {'reason': 'controller cfgd is not your adopte                                                                                        r due to misadoption'}&lt;BR /&gt;
  00-15-70-81-BE-8E    RFS7000           adopted   2017-07-04 06:15:58                                                                                                                N.A.&lt;BR /&gt;
  00-15-70-81-BE-8E    RFS7000        un-adopted   2017-07-04 06:09:36   Adopter                                                                                         70.81.BE.8E is no longer reachable&lt;BR /&gt;
  00-15-70-81-BE-8E    RFS7000           adopted   2017-07-04 06:09:20                                                                                                                N.A.&lt;BR /&gt;
  00-15-70-81-BE-8E    RFS7000        un-adopted   2017-07-04 06:09:07   Adopter                                                                                         70.81.BE.8E is no longer reachable&lt;BR /&gt;
  00-15-70-81-BE-8E    RFS7000           adopted   2017-07-04 06:08:15                                                                                                                N.A.&lt;BR /&gt;
  00-15-70-81-BE-8E    RFS7000        un-adopted   2017-07-04 06:01:58   Adopter                                                                                         70.81.BE.8E is no longer reachable&lt;BR /&gt;
  00-15-70-81-BE-8E    RFS7000           adopted   2017-07-04 06:01:36                                                                                                                N.A.&lt;BR /&gt;
  00-15-70-81-BE-8E    RFS7000        un-adopted   2017-07-04 06:01:24   Adopter                                                                                         70.81.BE.8E is no longer reachable&lt;BR /&gt;
  00-15-70-81-BE-8E    RFS7000           adopted   2017-07-04 06:00:33                                                                                                                N.A.&lt;BR /&gt;
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------   &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2017 10:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/extremewireless-wing/wing-5-8-5-reports-ap-s-as-down-but-they-are-not/m-p/18861#M929</guid>
      <dc:creator>Phil_storey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-04T10:39:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

