<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic RE: msm use one? or two? in FAQs</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/faqs/msm-use-one-or-two/m-p/43138#M155</link>
    <description>Yes. Dual MSMs is performed redundancy and process packets at the dual MSM. If one single MSM falls to half the packet throughput.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2014 13:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JaeChul_Jung</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-08-11T13:46:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>msm use one? or two?</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/faqs/msm-use-one-or-two/m-p/43137#M154</link>
      <description>I use the BD8810.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
What is the performance difference between when the MSM used only one  and dual MSM used  ?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2014 13:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/faqs/msm-use-one-or-two/m-p/43137#M154</guid>
      <dc:creator>UNC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-11T13:39:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: msm use one? or two?</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/faqs/msm-use-one-or-two/m-p/43138#M155</link>
      <description>Yes. Dual MSMs is performed redundancy and process packets at the dual MSM. If one single MSM falls to half the packet throughput.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2014 13:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/faqs/msm-use-one-or-two/m-p/43138#M155</guid>
      <dc:creator>JaeChul_Jung</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-11T13:46:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: msm use one? or two?</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/faqs/msm-use-one-or-two/m-p/43139#M156</link>
      <description>Indeed. Dual MSM's for redundancy.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
One MSM fails, the other one takes over right away.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 02:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/faqs/msm-use-one-or-two/m-p/43139#M156</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sergio_Diaz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-13T02:10:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: msm use one? or two?</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/faqs/msm-use-one-or-two/m-p/43140#M157</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;
As JaeChul said, this is not only for redundancy. MSM have both Management and Fabric role. 2 MSMs give a 1+1 redundancy for Management, but you need both MSM to achieve the highest throughput. They are both active for Fabric role.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 14:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/faqs/msm-use-one-or-two/m-p/43140#M157</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephane_Grosje</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-13T14:03:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

