<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic SecureStack C2 Support Guidelines for the MGBIC-02 in FAQs</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/faqs/securestack-c2-support-guidelines-for-the-mgbic-02/m-p/41724#M68</link>
    <description>Article ID: 5460 &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;B&gt;Products&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
SecureStack C2&lt;BR /&gt;
Matrix C2&lt;BR /&gt;
MGBIC-02&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;B&gt;Cause&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
SecureStack C2 &lt;A href="https://extranet.enterasys.com/downloads/pages/C2.aspx" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener"&gt;Release Notes and Installation Guides&lt;/A&gt; incorrectly imply that the MGBIC-02 (1000Mb twisted pair) has blanket support on all the SecureStack C2 products.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The MGBIC-02 &lt;U&gt;is not supported&lt;/U&gt; for the C2G124-24, C2G124-48, or C2G124-48P. Their native gigabit 10/100/1000 RJ45 ports and four MGBIC ports are shared in an "either/or" arrangement (&lt;A href="http://bit.ly/1f3jzeT" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener"&gt;5489&lt;/A&gt;), so there is no point to using a MGBIC-02 to replace a native port, for the same connectivity.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The MGBIC-02 &lt;U&gt;is conditionally supported&lt;/U&gt; for the C2G134-24P. Its native 10/100/1000 RJ21 ports and four MGBIC ports are shared in an "either/or" arrangement (&lt;A href="http://bit.ly/1f3jzeT" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener"&gt;5489&lt;/A&gt;) but are not of the same physical type, so the use of a MGBIC-02 could serve to provide RJ45 port connectivity. Here is the conditional element: Official MGBIC-02 support for the C2G134-24P is present with firmware 3.01.90 and higher. With older firmware, MGBIC-02 operation in a C2G134-24P is possible but not guaranteed.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The MGBIC-02 &lt;U&gt;is supported&lt;/U&gt; for the C2G170-24. Its 24 MGBIC ports could benefit from the copper media capability of the MGBIC-02.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The MGBIC-02 &lt;U&gt;is supported&lt;/U&gt; for the C2H124-48 and C2H124-48P. Their native 10/100 RJ45 ports and four MGBIC ports can be used simultaneously, so the use of a MGBIC-02 could serve to increase the useable copper port density.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;B&gt;Solution&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Functions as Designed (FAD).</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2014 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>FAQ_User</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-03-05T04:00:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SecureStack C2 Support Guidelines for the MGBIC-02</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/faqs/securestack-c2-support-guidelines-for-the-mgbic-02/m-p/41724#M68</link>
      <description>Article ID: 5460 &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;B&gt;Products&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
SecureStack C2&lt;BR /&gt;
Matrix C2&lt;BR /&gt;
MGBIC-02&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;B&gt;Cause&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
SecureStack C2 &lt;A href="https://extranet.enterasys.com/downloads/pages/C2.aspx" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener"&gt;Release Notes and Installation Guides&lt;/A&gt; incorrectly imply that the MGBIC-02 (1000Mb twisted pair) has blanket support on all the SecureStack C2 products.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The MGBIC-02 &lt;U&gt;is not supported&lt;/U&gt; for the C2G124-24, C2G124-48, or C2G124-48P. Their native gigabit 10/100/1000 RJ45 ports and four MGBIC ports are shared in an "either/or" arrangement (&lt;A href="http://bit.ly/1f3jzeT" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener"&gt;5489&lt;/A&gt;), so there is no point to using a MGBIC-02 to replace a native port, for the same connectivity.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The MGBIC-02 &lt;U&gt;is conditionally supported&lt;/U&gt; for the C2G134-24P. Its native 10/100/1000 RJ21 ports and four MGBIC ports are shared in an "either/or" arrangement (&lt;A href="http://bit.ly/1f3jzeT" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener"&gt;5489&lt;/A&gt;) but are not of the same physical type, so the use of a MGBIC-02 could serve to provide RJ45 port connectivity. Here is the conditional element: Official MGBIC-02 support for the C2G134-24P is present with firmware 3.01.90 and higher. With older firmware, MGBIC-02 operation in a C2G134-24P is possible but not guaranteed.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The MGBIC-02 &lt;U&gt;is supported&lt;/U&gt; for the C2G170-24. Its 24 MGBIC ports could benefit from the copper media capability of the MGBIC-02.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The MGBIC-02 &lt;U&gt;is supported&lt;/U&gt; for the C2H124-48 and C2H124-48P. Their native 10/100 RJ45 ports and four MGBIC ports can be used simultaneously, so the use of a MGBIC-02 could serve to increase the useable copper port density.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;B&gt;Solution&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Functions as Designed (FAD).</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2014 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/faqs/securestack-c2-support-guidelines-for-the-mgbic-02/m-p/41724#M68</guid>
      <dc:creator>FAQ_User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-03-05T04:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

