<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Matrix X f/w 2.x IOMs crashing at 497 days of uptime in FAQs</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/faqs/matrix-x-f-w-2-x-ioms-crashing-at-497-days-of-uptime/m-p/41837#M74</link>
    <description>Article ID: 14527 &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;B&gt;Products&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Matrix X-Series, firmware 2.0.0.0 through 2.0.1.0 &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;B&gt;Symptoms&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
IOMs are becoming unstable at 497 days of uptime. The 'ess' process is also crashing at this level of uptime, causing the IOM to restart. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;B&gt;Cause&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
In release 2.0.0.0, the linux kernel on the Matrix X was upgraded to version 2.6. Part of this upgrade was to resolve a previous 497 day bug that would destabilize the system. Unfortunately there is a bug remaining at the 497 day mark for the 'ess' process. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;B&gt;Solution/Workaround&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Upgrade to firmware 2.0.2.1 or higher.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="https://extranet.enterasys.com/downloads/pages/X.aspx" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener"&gt;Release notes&lt;/A&gt; state, in the 'Issues Resolved in release 2.0.2.1' section:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
After a system has been up for 497 days the ESS processes on each IOM and the&lt;BR /&gt;
CM are very likely to terminate abnormally producing syslog messages similar&lt;BR /&gt;
to the following:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
essDistServer@iom2: &lt;ALERT&gt; [hh??ss] x_lock.3 semTake(12000) failed 3997700&lt;BR /&gt;
syslog@iom2: &lt;CRITICAL&gt; [mm??ss] !! CID 58 [status = 0x803a1000]: x_lock.3&lt;BR /&gt;
semTake(12000) failed 3997700 !! &lt;BR /&gt;
kernel@iom2: &lt;WARNING&gt; Enterasys Crashlog: Fault detected, calling handler &lt;BR /&gt;
kernel@iom2: &lt;ALERT&gt; --Enterasys System Error Logger: Crash detected-- &lt;BR /&gt;
kernel@iom2: &lt;ALERT&gt; Name = /ens/bin/ess &lt;BR /&gt;
kernel@iom2: &lt;ALERT&gt; PID = &lt;BR /&gt;
kernel@iom2: &lt;ALERT&gt; TGID = &lt;BR /&gt;
kernel@iom2: &lt;ALERT&gt; Error code = 6&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
This is often immediately preceded by messages indicating an unexpected&lt;BR /&gt;
spanning tree topology change. This can cause general network instability&lt;BR /&gt;
while the modules are rebooting.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
In lieu of installing this release that contains the fix for this issue the&lt;BR /&gt;
problem can be worked around by scheduling a controlled system reset before&lt;BR /&gt;
the system has been up for 497 days.&lt;/ALERT&gt;&lt;/ALERT&gt;&lt;/ALERT&gt;&lt;/ALERT&gt;&lt;/ALERT&gt;&lt;/WARNING&gt;&lt;/CRITICAL&gt;&lt;/ALERT&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 06:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>FAQ_User</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-09-05T06:01:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Matrix X f/w 2.x IOMs crashing at 497 days of uptime</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/faqs/matrix-x-f-w-2-x-ioms-crashing-at-497-days-of-uptime/m-p/41837#M74</link>
      <description>Article ID: 14527 &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;B&gt;Products&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Matrix X-Series, firmware 2.0.0.0 through 2.0.1.0 &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;B&gt;Symptoms&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
IOMs are becoming unstable at 497 days of uptime. The 'ess' process is also crashing at this level of uptime, causing the IOM to restart. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;B&gt;Cause&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
In release 2.0.0.0, the linux kernel on the Matrix X was upgraded to version 2.6. Part of this upgrade was to resolve a previous 497 day bug that would destabilize the system. Unfortunately there is a bug remaining at the 497 day mark for the 'ess' process. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;B&gt;Solution/Workaround&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Upgrade to firmware 2.0.2.1 or higher.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="https://extranet.enterasys.com/downloads/pages/X.aspx" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener"&gt;Release notes&lt;/A&gt; state, in the 'Issues Resolved in release 2.0.2.1' section:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
After a system has been up for 497 days the ESS processes on each IOM and the&lt;BR /&gt;
CM are very likely to terminate abnormally producing syslog messages similar&lt;BR /&gt;
to the following:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
essDistServer@iom2: &lt;ALERT&gt; [hh??ss] x_lock.3 semTake(12000) failed 3997700&lt;BR /&gt;
syslog@iom2: &lt;CRITICAL&gt; [mm??ss] !! CID 58 [status = 0x803a1000]: x_lock.3&lt;BR /&gt;
semTake(12000) failed 3997700 !! &lt;BR /&gt;
kernel@iom2: &lt;WARNING&gt; Enterasys Crashlog: Fault detected, calling handler &lt;BR /&gt;
kernel@iom2: &lt;ALERT&gt; --Enterasys System Error Logger: Crash detected-- &lt;BR /&gt;
kernel@iom2: &lt;ALERT&gt; Name = /ens/bin/ess &lt;BR /&gt;
kernel@iom2: &lt;ALERT&gt; PID = &lt;BR /&gt;
kernel@iom2: &lt;ALERT&gt; TGID = &lt;BR /&gt;
kernel@iom2: &lt;ALERT&gt; Error code = 6&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
This is often immediately preceded by messages indicating an unexpected&lt;BR /&gt;
spanning tree topology change. This can cause general network instability&lt;BR /&gt;
while the modules are rebooting.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
In lieu of installing this release that contains the fix for this issue the&lt;BR /&gt;
problem can be worked around by scheduling a controlled system reset before&lt;BR /&gt;
the system has been up for 497 days.&lt;/ALERT&gt;&lt;/ALERT&gt;&lt;/ALERT&gt;&lt;/ALERT&gt;&lt;/ALERT&gt;&lt;/WARNING&gt;&lt;/CRITICAL&gt;&lt;/ALERT&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 06:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/faqs/matrix-x-f-w-2-x-ioms-crashing-at-497-days-of-uptime/m-p/41837#M74</guid>
      <dc:creator>FAQ_User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-05T06:01:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

