<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic RE: NAC agent base vs agent less in General Discussion</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/general-discussion/nac-agent-base-vs-agent-less/m-p/7498#M39</link>
    <description>Thanks!!!&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2016 11:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Marlon</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-09-21T11:26:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NAC agent base vs agent less</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/general-discussion/nac-agent-base-vs-agent-less/m-p/7495#M36</link>
      <description>hello,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
what is the advantages of agent-based over agent-less in NAC? or vice versa.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
thanks!&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Marlon&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 15:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/general-discussion/nac-agent-base-vs-agent-less/m-p/7495#M36</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marlon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-07T15:42:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: NAC agent base vs agent less</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/general-discussion/nac-agent-base-vs-agent-less/m-p/7496#M37</link>
      <description>Hi Marlon.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
agent based can detect what processes are running, what is on harddrive, what is the setting in registry. Agent less can detect if the application is vulnerable or not.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
each approach does have benefits &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
if the client does have strict firewall then agent less scan will not tell you much, and still the client can be very old and full of unwanted software.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2016 02:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/general-discussion/nac-agent-base-vs-agent-less/m-p/7496#M37</guid>
      <dc:creator>Zdeněk_Pala</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-10T02:14:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: NAC agent base vs agent less</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/general-discussion/nac-agent-base-vs-agent-less/m-p/7497#M38</link>
      <description>Hi, Marlon&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
We are currently running the software based agent for detecting and internal computer applications as initial security level, it is the best option for validation of desktop computers in jobs.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
In sporadic time a scan is performed with Nessus to detect occasional vulnerability to a specific group of users.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Regards.&lt;BR /&gt;
Mario Pardo&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2016 03:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/general-discussion/nac-agent-base-vs-agent-less/m-p/7497#M38</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mario_Pardo1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-10T03:14:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: NAC agent base vs agent less</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/general-discussion/nac-agent-base-vs-agent-less/m-p/7498#M39</link>
      <description>Thanks!!!&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2016 11:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/general-discussion/nac-agent-base-vs-agent-less/m-p/7498#M39</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marlon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-21T11:26:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

